Slashdot Mirror


Popular Science Frees Its 137-Year Archives

DesScorp writes "Popular Science magazine has scanned every issue they've ever produced, and posted the archives at their website, at no charge. 'We've partnered with Google to offer our entire 137-year archive for free browsing. Each issue appears just as it did at its original time of publication, complete with period advertisements. It's an amazing resource that beautifully encapsulates our ongoing fascination with the future, and science and technology's incredible potential to improve our lives. We hope you enjoy it as much as we do.'" First search: the history of the flying car.

7 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Kudos to them by mangu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This makes me seriously consider getting a subscription to their dead tree version again.

  2. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by maxume · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is popular media, not organized science.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  3. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    It should be labeled "Sudden outbreak of common scans"...

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  4. The period ads by istartedi · · Score: 4, Informative

    I bet the period advertisements alone will be priceless.

    As much as we hate advertising on the web, there is definitely something to be said for ads as a window into history.

    With so much content being dynamicly generated, we won't have period ads like we did with print.

    Embedded advertising could solve this, and it wouldn't be a problem if it were done as still images and text analagous to a printed ad. Of course, online advertisers seem to have a habit of shooting themselves in the foot in this regard--the temptation to introduce obtrusive ads just ups the ante in the arms race.

    Reading ads from pop sci might tell you that Ford has been in business for over 100 years. Reading web pages archived from today will tell you nothing of the sort. The ad will either be fetched and dynamicly generated (and thus be non-period) or it will be edited out by the archiver.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  5. Re:A nice start by houghi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seems there is a way and much better interface to use http://books.google.com/books?id=qR8DAAAAMBAJ which will point to the first issue. Great using the full-screen ability of your browser and see two pages next to each other.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  6. Breakthroughs by MartinSchou · · Score: 5, Informative

    Relativity: June, 1914, page 434
    Quantum mechanics: February 1927, page 22
    Atomic bomb: October 1945, page 80
    Integrated circuits: September 1966, page 96

    1. Re:Breakthroughs by slashqwerty · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Atomic bomb: October 1945, page 80

      "On August 5th 1945, an atomic explosion occurred within an annihilation bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Popular Science Monthly has looked forward to such a scientific triumph for many years..."

      Anyone else appalled by the lack of humanity in this article?

      That is a sign of the times. We had just ended the war with Germany and Italy. The atomic bombings were meant to end the war with Japan--the nation that launched the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor and brought the United States into the war. An estimated 60 million people died because of World War II. Two-thirds of those 60 million were civilians. Japan was responsible for the Nanking Massacre which did not endear them any sympathy.

      Entire cities were firebombed during the war. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs were less destructive than many firebombings that had occurred in the preceding years. The effects of radiation were not yet well-known to the general public. More powerful nuclear weapons had not yet been developed and the ramifications of nuclear war had not yet set in.

      I also doubt it was the weapon they looked forward to, so much as the ability to use nuclear energy.