Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Ask the UK Pirate Party's Andrew Robinson About the Issues

Posted by kdawson on from the but-not-about-the-eyepatch dept.

VJ42 writes "With the 2010 UK general election fast approaching, the Pirate Party of the United Kingdom will be fielding elections for the first time. The Digital Economy bill and ACTA are hot topics for UK geeks, and the Pirate Party is looking to pick up some votes. Their leader, Andrew Robinson, has agreed to answer your questions. Normal Slashdot interview rules apply."

3 of 391 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Forcing authors to lose rights over work by FeepingCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No.

    :)

    Basically, I disagree with everything you said. No, you shouldn't be able to retain permanent control over an idea. No, saving the GPL is not worth perpetuating our current broken copyright. And no, a world with drastically reduced creator control over their "intellectual property" would be on the whole far less controlling, instead of more.

    Besides, how often does the GPL come up in non-commercial cases?

  2. Priorities for spending of funds by jez9999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why does your treasurer and campaigns officer, apparently under heavy pressure from the likes of Eric Priezkalns, feel that spending almost all of the party funds on the upcoming general election is the right way to go, given that, realistically, the PPUK will not make much of an impact in these elections? Don't you think that the better approach is a long-term one, and blowing all the money available to the party right now on the upcoming elections would be resources badly spent, when they could be better used to garner long-term widespread support/publicity, and apply long-term pressure?

    --
    == Jez ==
    Do you miss Firefox? Try Pale Moon.
  3. Re:Forcing authors to lose rights over work by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Should creators have rights over their work? Yes. For a limited time. The problem is that the time is no longer limited and it is not the creators who are asserting rights, but huge third parties who are small in number. Small numbers of players in a marketplace means the consumer is screwed.

    Mickey Mouse should have been free LONG LONG ago but is not. Much very old music such as "happy birthday" is still being used as a weapon against people everywhere instead of being released to the public as it should have been long ago.

    The problem isn't that authors are being forced to lose control of their work -- it's that they are not. Worse, the authors ARE being forced into losing control of their work in favor of large copyright publishers.

    Your idealism in in some of the right places, but to see the problems, you have to first see reality as it is practiced.