Slashdot Mirror


Edward Tufte Appointed To Help Track and Explain Stimulus Funds

President Obama recently announced several appointments to the Recovery Independent Advisory Panel, including data visualization expert Edward Tufte, author of The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. The purpose of the panel is to advise the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, whose aim is "To promote accountability by coordinating and conducting oversight of Recovery funds to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse and to foster transparency on Recovery spending by providing the public with accurate, user-friendly information." Tufte said on his website, "I'm doing this because I like accountability and transparency, and I believe in public service. And it is the complete opposite of everything else I do. Maybe I'll learn something. The practical consequence is that I will probably go to Washington several days each month, in addition to whatever homework and phone meetings are necessary."

17 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. Blech. by Pojut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I'll show you politics in America. Here it is, right here. 'I think the puppet on the right shares my beliefs.' 'I think the puppet on the left is more to my liking.' 'Hey, wait a minute, there's one guy holding out both puppets!'" -Bill Hicks

    1. Re:Blech. by anaesthetica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Now, there's one thing you might have noticed I don't complain about: politicians. Everybody complains about politicians. Everybody says they suck. Well, where do people think these politicians come from? They don't fall out of the sky. They don't pass through a membrane from another reality.

      "They come from American parents and American families, American homes, American schools, American churches, American businesses and American universities, and they are elected by American citizens.

      "This is the best we can do folks. This is what we have to offer. It's what our system produces: Garbage in, garbage out.

      "If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're going to get selfish, ignorant leaders. Term limits ain't going to do any good; you're just going to end up with a brand new bunch of selfish, ignorant Americans. So, maybe, maybe, maybe, it's not the politicians who suck. Maybe something else sucks around here... like, the public. Yeah, the public sucks. There's a nice campaign slogan for somebody: 'The Public Sucks. Fuck Hope.'" —George Carlin

      link

  2. Academics by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just another feel good appointment of an academic to a position where they can't really do anything. Meanwhile Obama staffs his cabinet with wall street insiders. If Obama really wants transparency and accountability, he should fire Geithner and replace him with Elizabeth Warren. But no, he won't do that.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Academics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's also inexcusable that billions upon billions of dollars were given out without anything in place to track where that money was ending up. It's only after the fact that they consider such accounting?

      A mere $10,000 student loan has greater financial controls in place than the stimulus funding.

    2. Re:Academics by ottothecow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right, because the best choice would be someone who seriously believes that replacing our arbitrarily valued currency with vaults full of arbitrarily valued metal will fix everything wrong with our economy.

      --
      Bottles.
    3. Re:Academics by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think he ever once said it would fix everything. It would seriously help though to have it based on something that the supply isn't as easily gained as hitting a print button.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Academics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're confusing TARP and the Stimulus.

    5. Re:Academics by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think someone in favor of more regulation and not less would be best for the job.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Academics by khallow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're confusing TARP and the Stimulus.

      Maybe he's confusing them with Cash for Clunkers. I can't remember which program was the one without accountability. They all look so much alike in that regard.

  3. Re:The whole world loves us now! by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not surprised.

    The Republican party lost it's spine a long time ago and have splintered into many factions. Effectively, the party was dead even before the 2000 elections and since then has been without leadership.

    The Democratic party however, has been very unified but has been rotting from the core since the days of JFK. Now, it too is crumbling apart with rampant thuggery and corruption.

    I think we all know how the November elections will turn out. However, there is no way in hell we can foresee who the next president will be. Our political system as we know it, is fucked. I reckon this is a good thing. Perhaps now we can get people more involved with how politics happen in DC and start voting based on someones voting record, and not based purely on party. At least, I hope so.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  4. Re:Tufte scandal by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Err... so? He could be the biggest asshole in the world for all I care, so long as he does a good job and injects some accountability and transparency into the process.

  5. Re:Background anyone? by Mab_Mass · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know about this guys books, but I fail to see why he is going to be helpful.

    Quite simply, he will be helpful because when he puts together a report, there will be one or two incredibly informative graphs that explain where the money went and how that money changed things.

    By having this information in such a concise, digestible form, it will help bring transparency and accountability to the government.

    One of the major issues we're having in the U.S. is that one side is saying one thing and claiming absolutely that they are right while the other side is making contradictory claims just a vocally. Getting some real, solid, hard numbers and easily understand representations of these numbers will make these kinds of useless back and forth arguments less possible.

    At least that's the theory. We'll see if he can make any difference in practice.

  6. Re:The whole world loves us now! by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have to be 35 to serve, so that leaves a rather narrow window.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  7. Re:The whole world loves us now! by Dishevel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's hard to be impartial with shivers running up your leg.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  8. Re:Tufte scandal by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An asshole also might try to cover things up. That's the problem with assholes... you just never know.

  9. Re:Background anyone? by CodeBuster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least that's the theory. We'll see if he can make any difference in practice.

    In practice, political operatives will maneuver behind the scenes to ensure that whatever information the commission receives is carefully selected, filtered and sanitized so that the "right" conclusions are reached. The stakes are so high in this case that it is incredibly naïve to think that there won't be skullduggery.

  10. You've got to be kidding me... by sean.peters · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately, the extremes of the parties are the ones in control...

    Unless by "extremes of the parties" you mean the rightmost extremes of both parties, I think you've gone round the bend. If the extreme left wing of the Democrats had been in control, Dennis Kucinich would have been the nominee. That guy really is far to the left. Obama? There are few Democrats more centrist. Just a quick example: health care. The current plan in play in Congress is almost exactly the same as the one Mitt freakin' Romney signed into law when he was governor of Massachusetts. Until recently, this would have been a Republican health care plan - the mainstream opinion among Democrats is that single-payer is the way to go.

    Regardless of your personal preferences on issues like health care, it's an absolute fact that the Democratic party is controlled by highly centrist types, and the Republican party is being run by, not to put too fine a point on it, whackjobs.