Slashdot Mirror
How the Internet Didn't Fail As Predicted
Lord Byron Eee PC writes "Newsweek is carrying a navel-gazing piece on how wrong they were when in 1995 they published a story about how the Internet would fail. The original article states, 'Nicholas Negroponte, director of the MIT Media Lab, predicts that we'll soon buy books and newspapers straight over the Intenet. Uh, sure.' The article continues to say that online shopping will never happen, that airline tickets won't be purchased over the web, and that newspapers have nothing to fear. It's an interesting look back at a time when the Internet was still a novelty and not yet a necessity."
Here's a good past prediction: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/1816257
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
He's right you know. Those computers were the size of rooms. As demand went beyond 5, they started dividing those computers up into smaller ones. Ever wonder why computers are always getting smaller? They are running out of those 5 original computers, so they have to go smaller and smaller in order to stretch them further.
My webcomic
I swore I read about this 15 years ago. Slashdots getting worse.
In 1995 or 1996 Cliff was the keynote speaker at the Dayton Hamvention. He really got those old men fired up and hating on the Internet. He was promoting a book named "Silicon Snake Oil", IIRC. It was quite humorous for the next two or three years to watch the reaction of some of those guys asking about manuals for stuff I was selling in the Dayton boneyard. I would direct them to check in the Internet, and they would loose all manner of sensibility. Too funny.
--fatboy
Watching dudes whack their 3 inch dongs on Chat Roulette gives you all human contact you could ever want. :-)
Cock Up Your Beaver" does not mean what you think. That might be true, but googling that phrase will produce exactly the results you would expect.
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
On the other hand some of the predictions on slashdot have been bang on such as Linus Says 2004 is the Year for Desktop Linux
A big-wig at I.B.M. predicted the entire world market for computers would be restricted to about 5 units.
'But I predict that within one-hundred years, computers will be twice as powerful, 10,000 times larger and so expensive that only the five richest kings of Europe will be able to afford one....'
I care not for your karma and your mod points.
Is it me or did that sound like a sales pitch?
The solution to the looming computer shortage is to have more and more people share each of these remaining computers. I have developed an optimal technique for sharing (I call it Normalized Access Time, or NAT for short).
An alternate solution might be to just build more computers, but I'm not sure the infrastructure is in place for that yet.
Online Starcraft RPG? At
Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
...Even if you never use it yourself, it would still effect you.
For example, if the internet were down, you might not be able to look up the proper usage of certain words.
He moved up from janitor to... designated ink reloader? I was expecting a bit more "riches" in this rags to riches story.
My brother-in-law is an executive for a printing company. He moved up through the ranks. Started out cleaning bathrooms, and spent years reloading ink into massive printers. His company like many others got bought up, and he has seen the company that bought his be bought by a yet larger company. Most large scale printing has been consolidated into a few large companies.
See we learned something today. Its called reading everything. Have a good day kids.
It's an interesting look back at a time when the Internet was still a novelty and not yet a necessity.
I'd be interested to see something that is both a novelty and a necessity.
Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF