Slashdot Mirror


Jobs Says No Tethering iPad To iPhone

tugfoigel writes "Anyone who currently owns an iPhone and was hoping they would be able to use it as a mobile Web access point for a Wi-Fi iPad just got some bad news. Reportedly, Steve Jobs has said this will not happen. Swedish blog Slashat.se claims they e-mailed Jobs directly to ask him whether or not you'd be able to tether your iPad and iPhone and received a terse 'No' in reply. According to the report, the email headers made it plausible that the reply had come from Jobs's iPhone."

12 of 423 comments (clear)

  1. Re:You get what you pay for? by BearRanger · · Score: 2, Informative

    $15 a month in the US. The iPad is primarily a wi-fi device, or so it seems to me. Why would anyone pay for the unlimited data plan?

  2. Re:When they came for the iPhone users by Kitkoan · · Score: 3, Informative

    In what way is the DRM in Windows 7 harming me?

    Tthe glitch where it thinks it's been pirated and down grades you to changing to a black background and nags you to buy a real copy (even though you are using one)

    --
    Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
  3. Re:Forged Headers? by Mistlefoot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not to mention, to ask Steve Jobs a question via his direct email address and then get a reply means either:

    1) someone is hacking Steve Jobs incoming email and read the question and replied
    2) someone guessed that Steve Jobs was asked this questions and then coincidentally spoofed an answer to person they correctly guessed asked it
    3) Steve Jobs replied.

    number 1 is big news - Steve Jobs email is not secure!!!!
    number 2 is conspiracy theory material
    number 3 confirms what Steve Jobs said in a pcmag article 2 days ago and seems the logically obvious choice.

  4. There's an app for that... by spmkk · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.rockyourphone.com/index.php/mywi.html

    Handy little utility to turn your iPhone into a wi-fi hotspot so you can tether any wi-fi enabled device, including the iPad.

    (Disclaimer: I haven't used it personally, but it comes highly recommended.)

  5. Re:Isn't this anti-trust / tying / anti-competitiv by Homburg · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you happen to be running an open source OS on your phone, you get to pay 3x the amount you'd pay for THE EXACT SAME SERVICE if your phone ran Symbian.

    I don't think that's true. If you buy an Android phone, they force you to buy an unlimited text and data package; but this costs the same as adding unlimited text and data to any of their regular packages. And, if you bring your own Android phone, TMobile isn't going to know, or care, about it: they'll charge you the same for data access as they would charge anyone else.

  6. Re:You get what you pay for? by sopssa · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least with Linux you can code the feature in. Same with Windows (Mobile). Even with goddamn Symbian.

    $60 a month for 5GB limited 3G plan with some additional device? Jeez. I pay around $20 a month for 1 Mbit/s unlimited 3G and they happily send extra sim cards if you want to use the same contract with extra devices and no bullshit clauses about tethering etc.

  7. Re:You get what you pay for? by sopssa · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.macrumors.com/2010/01/27/ipad-sdk-3-2-details-external-display-file-sharing-system-no-multitasking/

    Apple has unleashed iPhone OS 3.2 SDK to developers today to prepare for the launch of the Apple iPad. The new iPhone OS 3.2 only runs on the iPad device and will not run on the iPhone or iPod Touch.

    - No Multitasking. Only one application runs at a time according to official documentation.

  8. Re:You get what you pay for? by Fjandr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since T-Mobile changed their rate plans, I managed to upgrade two lines to unlimited data/Blackberry email for only an additional $10/month (and no contract extension to boot). And yeah, they don't give a damn if it's tethered to something or not. I think this is the exception to "you get what you pay for," unless people really are intending to pay that much to be screwed.

  9. Re:Not any phone. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, my 3 year old Nokia (S40) can do it via Bluetooth, and so can any other S40 Nokia that I've seen.

  10. Re:You get what you pay for? by siloko · · Score: 2, Informative

    The biggest problem with Linux is it doesn't "just work". It in fact often "doesn't work" unless you go hunting for patches . . .

    he, he

    Roll up! Roll up! chuck that ole 2010 in the bin and welcome to version 1.1 of 1993!

  11. Re:You get what you pay for? by Rozine · · Score: 4, Informative

    I understand your frustration, but you're doing it wrong. If you use the official hardware drivers program in the administration menu, kernel upgrades will not cause this behavior. (This is actually the default behavior on a new install now - it pops up and asks you). And it is supported by Canonical.

  12. Re:You get what you pay for? by agrif · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're a click on "install" and a password away. Make sure she knows that when the computer asks for a password, it's asking to do something that could seriously screw things up, and should only be done with expert help.

    Besides, you do know that the official nVidia driver is available in Ubuntu through the "Restricted Drivers" window, right? These get updated with the kernel, so this shouldn't even be a problem.