Slashdot Mirror


Farewell To the South Pole Dome

Julie188 writes "After more than three decades of service to researchers and staff stationed at the bottom of the world, the dome at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station was deconstructed this austral summer. Designed and constructed by the Seabees — the construction battalions of the US Navy — in the early 1970s, the dome's geodesic design provided a unique solution to the challenges posed to engineers trying to build structures at the South Pole. The dome is being returned to southern California where it will be held in storage. It could possibly be trotted out as an exhibit in a new US Navy Seabees museum."

9 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. Pictures and more info by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 4, Informative

    For anyone interested here is the link on the NSF page showing the old site and the new facility. Pretty cool (pardon the pun).

    1. Re:Pictures and more info by atomic-penguin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here are deconstruction photos of the former dome station.

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  2. Re:Better? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Dismantled" would be a better choice.

    I think "Superior" would be a superior choice.

    It's not hard to suggest Synonyms and sound pompous.

  3. nopics with noscript by anagama · · Score: 4, Informative

    It would be awfully nice if submitters would include links to sites with pictures where you don't have enable 50 scripts just to see a jpeg. For example, linking to wikipedia is a no brainer that would save a million keystrokes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amundsen-Scott_South_Pole_Station

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    1. Re:nopics with noscript by mapkinase · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, some people like myself would be curious about inside of the dome.

      Picture of the inside from Polar Phitalely website

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  4. Re:Dang Air Force cutbacks. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey, this administration dismantled LORAN-C, the backup system in case of GPS satellite spoofing or jamming.....

    President Obama is influential, but he isn't capable of time travel. President Bush scheduled the dismantling, President Obama continued that recommendation. Both the Coast Guard and the DHS said they didn't need LORAN-C, so why maintain it? It smells like pork.

    This dismantling was already scheduled by the previous administration, according to the FA.


    The Department of Homeland Security last year started a painful upgrade to LORAN-C, adding modern electronics and solid-state transmitters, despite the fact that in 2008 President George W. Bush signed a law that scheduled the system's dissolution.

    http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/Loran/default.htm

    The DHS and Coast Guard both said they didn't need LORAN-C. From http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/Loran/default.htm :

    The Homeland Security Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010 allowed for termination of the LORAN-C signal on January 4, 2010, after certification from the Commandant of the Coast Guard that it was not needed for maritime navigation and from the Secretary of DHS that it is not needed as a backup for GPS.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  5. Re:Deconstructed? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 3, Informative

    They have a large, new building and don't need this one. It's too small and requires a lot of maintenance. The international treaty governing Antarctica requires that unused buildings be removed and the site returned to as close to the original state as possible. No danger of it turning into a penguin slum this far from the coast, but if the Shoggoths move in, it will really mess up the neighborhood.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  6. And Here is Why by Lifyre · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because TFS couldn't be bothered to give a hint as to why I will...

    "The dome could no longer accommodate the demands of research activities taking place there, however, and each year the structure sunk deeper into the ice it was built on. Blowing snow that collected on top of it had to be removed and hauled away, burning up precious fuel and crew time during the short austral summer. The international treaty that governs human activities in Antarctica requires that buildings and equipment no longer in use be removed and the site remediated whenever possible, necessitating the dome's deconstruction and removal."

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  7. Re:Deconstructed? Reason from TFA by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Informative

    Snow covering it is sinking into the snow. Same effect. Snow covers it each year but never melts. The next year, more snow covers it.

    Meanwhile, the entire glacier is slowly squirting out at all sides towards the sea. The net effect is a glacier that's not necessarily getting any thicker, but items sitting on top of it effectively "sink" in the additional snowfall as any given layer moves down and out to the sea.

    The new station can be jacked up on hydraulics up to two stories "higher" than its current position. As the layer its supports are buried in sinks, the building can be kept level.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.