Slashdot Mirror


OpenSSH 5.4 Released

HipToday writes "As posted on the OpenBSD Journal, OpenSSH 5.4 has been released: 'Some highlights of this release are the disabling of protocol 1 by default, certificate authentication, a new "netcat mode," many changes on the sftp front (both client and server) and a collection of assorted bugfixes. The new release can already be found on a large number of mirrors and of course on www.openssh.com.'"

7 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. Cygwin's package was updated, too by klui · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The read-only feature of sftp makes it almost a replacement for anonymous ftp. Too bad it appears to be a global setting.

    1. Re:Cygwin's package was updated, too by Sancho · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Could you not do this with a combination of Match User and ForceCommand directives? Something like:

      Match User anonymous
              ForceCommand sftp-server -R
              ChrootDirectory /home/anonymous

    2. Re:Cygwin's package was updated, too by Sancho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Arguably, running one less service would be nice. Also, OpenSSH's chrooting is pretty painless for sftp (though arguably, proper chrooting mostly precludes the need for read-only service--having your server read-only does add another layer of security.)

  2. Please note: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A brief quote from the project's home page:
    Please take note of our Who uses it page, which list just some of the vendors who incorporate OpenSSH into their own products -- as a critically important security / access feature -- instead of writing their own SSH implementation or purchasing one from another vendor. This list specifically includes companies like Cisco, Juniper, Apple, Red Hat, and Novell; but probably includes almost all router, switch or unix-like operating system vendors. In the 10 years since the inception of the OpenSSH project, these companies have contributed not even a dime of thanks in support of the OpenSSH project (despite numerous requests).

    So go and DONATE, as i've just done.

  3. Re:SFTP improvements by Sancho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't that tab completion only work if your key is either not protected by a passphrase or cached by ssh-agent? Unfortunately, the policy where I work is that you cannot cache credentials like that, and they must be protected by a passphrase. The new features are actually good for me!

  4. Re:Thank you Open SSH devs by overlordofmu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In my case, they block YouTube with a bogus DNS resolution. Internal DNS gives a intranet IP address (which gives a default intranet page) and my home server DNS gives the correct IP address(es). I tested this again, just now, and YouTube only works for me with that setting ("network.proxy.socks_remote_dns" as true) and is blocked if it is changed to false (which I believe is the default).

    I am using Firefox version 3.5.8, 32-bit, for x86.

    It seems, within Firefox itself, that your DNS queries with SOCKS 5 proxies still use the system default DNS and not the proxy DNS, but I could not say for sure without testing your machine. In my case, I am certain that Firefox is using the system DNS unless I change this setting from its default in Firefox. (I am certain because I just tested it 5 minutes ago.) Also, YouTube works without a proxy if I use the OpenDNS.org DNS servers in my Windows TCP/IP settings. (But then no intranet DNS queries work because OpenDNS knows nothing of our 10.*.*.* intranet.)

    Again, I am only speculating, but please consider than your DNS queries are not being proxied and are evidence of where you surf even if your traffic is SSHed.

    A final note, when I am really feeling paranoid about my surfing there is the AES 256-bit loopback block device that hold a Linux install on the work laptop. That way, there is no browser history to be searched by corporate. Hell, there is no Linux to be found; it looks like a whole partition of garbage without the decryption keys. It won't boot without them. However, I am developing for Windows on Windows, so the Linux boots are a rarity these days.

  5. Re:New, Problematic Protocol Introduced by OttoM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The OpenSSH developers do not trust any X.509 code. The actual X.509 validation and trust decision mechanisms are pretty horiffic, and I'm glad they stayed away from that. You don't have to throw away your X.509 certs, you can keep using them for other purposes.