Slashdot Mirror


Bill To Ban All Salt In Restaurant Cooking

lord_rotorooter writes "Felix Ortiz, D-Brooklyn, introduced a bill that would ruin restaurant food and baked goods as we know them. The measure (if passed) would ban the use of all forms of salt in the preparation and cooking of food for all restaurants or bakeries. While the use of too much salt can contribute to health problems, the complete banning of salt would have negative impacts on food chemistry. Not only does salt enhance flavor, it controls bacteria, slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten. Salt also inhibits the growth of microbes that spoil cheese."

4 of 794 comments (clear)

  1. Better food labeling would be a better law by presidenteloco · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    All food products sold in grocery stores should have a simple
    red, yellow, or green icon prominent on their packaging.

    - Red would be high simple carbs or high salt or has transfats.

    -Yellow would be "iffy foods" which have moderate simple-carb levels,
    fat levels, and low salt.

    -Green would basically be veggies or very high-fibre carbs or
    plant protein etc.

    Or the most complex you could go would be separate
    colors for heart health (lots of salt or fat = bad = red)
    and metabolic health (lots of simple carbs bad = red)

    So a red heart icon beside a yellow circle would indicate something
    really bad for your heart if you keep eating them, but so-so for
    developing diabetes or obesity.

    This would raise awareness, and if you shopped and bought lots
    of "Green" and some yellows, and maybe one "red" for the week,
    you'd be a healthy human, diet-wise at least.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  2. Re:This is just grandstanding. by wrfelts · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...there's no reason to get all worked up about it as it has 0 chance of ever passing.

    Not been keeping up with the current healthcare insurance bill, have we?

  3. Re:This just in! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There ought to be an Internet License.

    You wouldn't be able to pass the vision test.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  4. Re:This just in! by dbIII · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    he was arguably the least effective president in the last 100 years

    Your blind tribalism is showing. If you ignore which team you want to cheer for you'll see there were far worse on both teams. Ford and Bush Jnr probably tie for last place, a lot of people have fond memories for Reagan for some unknown reason but he's the guy that managed to restart the cold war when the USSR was already falling apart, made us fear the bomb again and nearly destroyed the economy doing it (plus his massive ransom paid to Iranian terrorists and the Lebanon "show the flag" debacle convinced all the potential terrorists in the world that the USA was weak). Nixon was even hated by his own party and considered an outsider so couldn't get much done. There is a long list of failures before you get to the guy that was voted out becuase he let the Shah go to a US hospital. Even LBJ should get a mention for committing a lot of US troops in a pointless move to help with French colonialism.