Slashdot Mirror


Texas Approves Conservative Curriculum

Macharius writes "Today, the Texas Board of Education approved 11-4 a social studies curriculum that will put a conservative stamp on history and economics textbooks, stressing the role of Christianity in American history and presenting Republican political philosophies in a more positive light. The article goes on to mention that Texas's textbook approvals carry less influence than they used to due to digital localization technology, but is that even measurable given how many millions of these textbooks will still be used across the country?"

6 of 999 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Can someone explain please by mdwh2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You could RTFA :) It contains several of the amendments that were passed.

    To comment on a few:

    Mr. Bradley ... won approval for an amendment stressing that Germans and Italians were interned in the United States as well as the Japanese during World War II, to counter the idea that the internment of Japanese was motivated by racism.

    Yes, obviously that means it can't have been an issue of race...

    In the field of sociology, another conservative member, Barbara Cargill, won passage of an amendment requiring the teaching of the importance of personal responsibility for life choices in a section on teen suicide, dating violence, sexuality, drug use and eating disorders.

    The topic of sociology tends to blame society for everything, Ms. Cargill said.

    Wow - are they going to stop blaming images, films, porn, rock music and computer games for these things too?

  2. Re:Can someone explain please by BitHive · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's an excerpt from: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/11/us/politics/11texas.html?src=me

    There have also been efforts among conservatives on the board to tweak the history of the civil rights movement. One amendment states that the movement created “unrealistic expectations of equal outcomes” among minorities. Another proposed change removes any reference to race, sex or religion in talking about how different groups have contributed to the national identity.

    The amendments are also intended to emphasize the unalloyed superiority of the “free-enterprise system” over others and the desirability of limited government.

    One says publishers should “describe the effects of increasing government regulation and taxation on economic development and business planning.”

    Throughout the standards, the conservatives have pushed to drop references to American “imperialism,” preferring to call it expansionism. “Country and western music” has been added to the list of cultural movements to be studied.

    References to Ralph Nader and Ross Perot are proposed to be removed, while Stonewall Jackson, the Confederate general, is to be listed as a role model for effective leadership, and the ideas in Jefferson Davis’s inaugural address are to be laid side by side with Abraham Lincoln’s speeches.

    Early in the hearing on Wednesday, Mr. McLeroy and other conservatives on the board made it clear they would offer still more planks to highlight what they see as the Christian roots of the Constitution and other founding documents.

    “To deny the Judeo-Christian values of our founding fathers is just a lie to our kids,” said Ken Mercer, a San Antonio Republican.

  3. Re:It's about time by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't bother replying to that guy. All his posts have always looked like that. Real short, idiotic, and hostile.

    80-90% of them quickly sink to -1 and all the rest get 5, which probably reflects a political polarization among moderators.

  4. Re:Damn intarweb! by eepok · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?id=6177 is good for general quotes from the Founding Fathers regarding religion. I like:

    "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion." - John Adams

    "...Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind." - John Adams

    "...an amendment was proposed by inserting the words, 'Jesus Christ...the holy author of our religion,' which was rejected 'By a great majority in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and the Mohammedan, the Hindoo and the Infidel of every denomination.'" - Thomas Jefferson

    "Our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, more than on our opinions in physics and geometry....The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson

    "Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise....During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in laity; in both, superstition, bigotry, and persecution." - James Madison

    "All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit." - Thomas Paine

  5. Re:What? by mdwh2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Like England is? Last I looked, they were a pretty secular, post-xian society

    I agree that the OP is an idiot (substituting one set of religious rulers for another set is hardly an improvement), but note that we still have issues such as the bishops who get given seats in our House of Lords, or the legal requirement for Christian worship in all UK schools (including state schools - the only exception is Faith schools where they can teach myths of a different kind instead). Hell, I even have to pay £100 for insurance when buying a house, because of the medieval Chancel repair liabilities that the Church still has on thousands of properties.

    It's interesting that despite the legal grip of Christianity on the state, compared with the US's separation of church and state, the UK has a far less religious population (both in terms of raw numbers, and also in terms of fundamentalist beliefs). But that doesn't mean the UK is a secular society - I still wish I wasn't under the rule of the Anglican church.

    Though to get back to the earlier post - despite the UK still having state religion, I find it funny that at least we print Darwin on our bank notes :)

  6. Re:Woah! by jjohnson · · Score: 5, Informative

    I dislike them because:

    For all their vaunted Christian morals and breastbeating on the importance of marriage, they have a higher divorce rate than the national average, and even 50% higher than the atheists and agnostics they despise.

    After they fail and ask God for forgiveness, they go right back to the hookers with whom they got caught (c.f., Jimmy Swaggart).

    They embezzle millions from their mega-churches, which makes me think they're in it for the money more than the God (c.f., Jim Baker).

    They extort millions from their followers by claiming God will kill them if the sheep don't pay up (c.f., Oral Roberts).

    They spend their Christian lives doing everything they can to make homosexuals suffer, only to get busted offering to pay guys at truck stops to receive blowjobs from them (c.f., Bob Allen), or tapping their foot in an airport restroom (c.f., Larry Craig), or using their ministry's travel budget to fund methamphetamine and gay sex party weekends (c.f., Ted Haggard).

    In other words, I dislike them because they're hypocrites who claim they're better than everyone else when in fact, they're usually worse, but they're very happy to try to force their morals on me through laws and textbooks.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.