Slashdot Mirror


Obama Backs MPAA, RIAA, and ACTA

boarder8925 writes "In a move sure to surprise no one, Obama has come out on the side of the MPAA/RIAA and has backed the ACTA: 'We're going to aggressively protect our intellectual property,' Obama said in his speech, 'Our single greatest asset is the innovation and the ingenuity and creativity of the American people [...] It is essential to our prosperity and it will only become more so in this century. But it's only a competitive advantage if our companies know that someone else can't just steal that idea and duplicate it with cheaper inputs and labor.'"

10 of 703 comments (clear)

  1. "Single greatest" = "sole remaining" amirite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Next up: The Texas schoolboard mandates that textbooks 'de-emphasise' the RECORDED HISTORICAL FACT that Hollywood was founded on industrialised copyright infringement.

  2. I really despise obama now. by unity100 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    despite i have been a staunch supporter of him and quarreled with my conservative american friends for close to a year since his candidacy to his election and even beyond.

    really, from this point on, i dont think i will be hypocritical to defend him in any regard. there are things that can be overlooked and forgiven, noone is perfect. but ransoming rights and liberties of the thought process to private individuals is nothing less than feudalism at its best. and someone who can justify this to himself cannot be defended in anything else.

  3. Re:We should all copyright... by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually assuming you have a particular way you go about accomplishing your job, it might actually be patentable.

    I remember not long ago some company was trying to patent how they ran their business, something to do with how to schedule and conduct the business meetings I believe.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  4. Another un-winnable war. by Simulant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We sure know how to pick 'em.

  5. Neal Stephenson is a genius by Vahokif · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When it gets down to it -- talking trade balances here -- once we've brain-drained all our technology into other countries, once things have evened out, they're making cars in Bolivia and microwave ovens in Tadzhikistan and selling them here -- once our edge in natural resources has been made irrelevant by giant Hong Kong ships and dirigibles that can ship North Dakota all the way to New Zealand for a nickel -- once the Invisible Hand has taken all those historical inequities and smeared them out into a broad global layer of what a Pakistani brickmaker would consider to be prosperity -- y'know what? There's only four things we do better than anyone else:

    • music
    • movies
    • microcode (software)
    • high-speed pizza delivery

  6. Re:Wild West Internet will be gone by Znork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IP is going to be the foundation of any future economy.

    IP is just various monopoly rights. See the former Soviet union on how well monopolies work. Monopolies are antithetical to an effective economy and thus will not be a foundation, but a burden.

    it'll be up to our inventions and our software and our innovation in exporting ideas

    Please. IP is mainly good for extracting resources out of an economy, it has nothing to do with 'exporting'. Implementing IP laws is a net loss for any economy, and most of the time (certainly in the case of the US), the monopoly rights will be held by foreign corporations.

    The only way forward is to make western economies competitive again. Repealing at the very least copyright and patents would be a good start towards reestablishing a highly competitive free market and lowering the burden on western labour (thus reducing their price).

  7. Re:Let's Do Something by chrb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, ACTA is aimed towards giving IP laws more power, globally. But how much do you think countries with real problems care about protecting IP laws from countries they don't care about?

    From the position of the MPAA and RIAA there are several different positions that they care about or don't. Russians and Chinese copying music and movies isn't a big problem - those countries have always had large scale piracy operations and undeveloped IP markets, and the potential profit margins are thin or non-existant. If this were to change, then there would be an opportunity to develop new markets, which the RIAA/MPAA would be interested in. But at the moment the markets are lost. The real global battlefield is in the European Union - a larger market economy than the USA, where the average price for a DVD or CD is much higher than the US, and with a voracious appetite for American produced content. If groups like the Pirate Party begin to make serious headway in scaling back European copyright, then the RIAA/MPAA is going to lose control over one of its most profitable markets. The other market they really care about is (obviously) the USA. It is not such a large battlefield since U.S. laws are already more MPAA/RIAA friendly. By agreeing to a global copyright enforcement treaty, that is supported by American corporations, they will be able to easily pass legislation with broad cross-party support, and with little room for debate because the details have "already been agreed and signed" before being considered at the level of national law.

    Because its consumers have to hand money to the IP owners abroad, with nothing to little coming back in return.

    Have you got any idea how much money is spent by European consumers and businesses on U.S. software, movies, books, films etc?

  8. Heinlein said it best by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "There has grown in the minds of certain groups in this country the idea
    that just because a man or corporation has made a profit out of the
    public for a number of years, the government and the courts are charged
    with guaranteeing such a profit in the future, even in the face of changing
    circumstances and contrary to public interest. This strange doctrine is
    supported by neither statute or common law. Neither corporations or
    individuals have the right to come into court and ask that the clock
    of history be stopped, or turned back."

    - Heinlein, Life Line, 1939

    --
    No sig today...
  9. Re:First rebellion by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Question: Now that all the manufacturing jobs are all but a memory, what exactly are you going to do with those millions of out of work Americans who don't have the creative ability to "make IP" huh? There are literally millions of them, can't speak for the rest of the country but the south is quickly becoming nothing but dead towns with boarded up homes.

    You gonna pay them to sit at home and consume IP? No money for IP working at Mickey D, hell most places you'll be lucky to keep a roof over your head. So what are you gonna do with them? Kinda pointless to try educating them, as we have seen in the tech sector they'll ship the white collar jobs off shore just as quick. So what exactly do you do with these teaming masses in your magical IP economy, which stuff all the money in a few pockets at the top, while the rest can go get fucked?

    Better think quick, as all these oath takers and other bunches gathering guns ain't doing it because they are happy little campers you know. All it is gonna take is another Stalin or Hitler, that is a good speaker and can rally the masses to say "see those rich bastards? Why the hell should we be living like dirt while those blood sucking leeches live like kings? let's just kill those pigs and take it back!" to have everything in your IP economy turn into a shit storm. Don't forget multinational corporations have NO loyalty to you, this country, or anyone but themselves.

    You got millions out of work, millions of poor, pissed off individuals, many of whom have pretty much become completely disgusted by the greed and corporation kissing like we see in TFA. Frankly I don't think it would take much to light the powderkeg ATM. Wish it wasn't so, but that is what happens when your leaders develop a "let them eat cake" mentality. And we saw how well it turned out for the last ones that had that attitude, didn't we? Don't think it can't happen again, because when you are bankrupt, with no job and no hope, and your life is nothing but shit, what have you got to lose?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  10. Re:First rebellion by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is completely misleading. These numbers include goods produced by nominally American corporations even if all the work is done by employees based outside of the US. This particular scam has been debunked multiple times by the business press.

    BTW, the US GDP numbers also include goods produced outside the USA by non-American labor.

    If you strip out the work/products made by non-US employees of US corporations, you'll see that both the US GDP and exports have been in steep decline for the past decade.

    Magnus.