Slashdot Mirror


Deposit Checks To Your Bank By Taking a Photo

Pickens writes "The Mercury News reports that consumers will soon be able to deposit a check by snapping a photo of it with a cell phone and transmitting an encrypted copy to their bank. Although some critics contend paperless deposits are an attempt by the banking industry to eliminate 'float,' the standard one- or two-day waiting period between the time someone writes a check and the time the money is actually taken out of their account, actually remote-deposit capture started out as a way for big companies and financial institutions to process huge numbers of checks without having to ship them around the country. 'Our customers are becoming more and more tech-savvy,' said an SVP for mobile banking at Citibank. 'We're trying to support those people on the go.' Although the process adds a new wrinkle to concerns about fraud and the privacy of financial data, banks and the technology companies helping them say they have largely overcome these concerns. Another bank SVP said, 'For many institutions struggling to raise deposits and differentiate, this is an outstanding offering they can roll out inexpensively [note: interstitial]. It's a sticky product.'"

64 of 494 comments (clear)

  1. Checks by sopssa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or what if US just stops using inferior checks and just wires money like rest of the world? It's also possible to even push money in to credit cards directly, in addition to normal bank wires. Checks are insecure, inconvenient and pretty useless in today's electronic world. For non-electronical purposes you can just use cash.

    1. Re:Checks by Securityemo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up - this suggestion, together with "tech-savy", sounds absolutely retarded when you're used to european instant wire transfers. Who runs the US banking system, stuffy 200-year old vampires?

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    2. Re:Checks by realsilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good God, push your money into to credit cards directly? Are you insane? Can you imagine the fees the credit card companies can and would likely impose?

      Your deposit is too small - FEE
      Your deposit is too big - FEE
      Your deposit is greater than your minimum payment we'll just apply your paycheck to what you owe us and here's a Fee for that service - FEE
      Your deposit is not every week - FEE
      We don't like who you work for, they are not in our network - FEE
      Your direct deposit bounced - FEE

      Ok so those are a little crazy, but if you look at what credit card companies employ already, those aren't that far off.

      --
      Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    3. Re:Checks by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That would mean forcing the banks to serve the customer instead of the shareholders.

      Are you INSANE???????

      customers are nothing but pests that must be tolerated.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Checks by ircmaxell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. And with the direct photo taking of checks, you are removing one of the layers of security that they have (the security paper they are printed on)... I wonder how much of an increase in check photoshoping, err I mean forging we'll see...

      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    5. Re:Checks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You seem to have a pretty firm grasp of our banking system :D

    6. Re:Checks by realsilly · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wire transfers cost $25 a transfer here.

      --
      Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    7. Re:Checks by aicrules · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I haven't paid by anything other than electronic methods for years now...what bank is screwing you?

    8. Re:Checks by AndrewNeo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is something I have never understood. Why on earth do normal people use banks when there are credit unions?

    9. Re:Checks by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All american ones.

      If I transfer cash to a friend it costs me $25.00 processing fee plus a $15.00 transaction fee.

      This is normal for american banks.

      Granted I could use a credit card and pay interest on that but why should I do that. credit cards are for credit NOT bill payment.

      I still write a check to pay my electric bill because the electric company charges an extra $3.50 for me to pay electronically.

      It's all about screwing the customer, banks love to do that here in the United states. Over in europe they are more restricted when it comes to screwing people.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Checks by tom17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Germany at least, you don't. You have their bank information (Most businesses have it publicly displayed). They don't have a fucked up system whereby anyone having your bank details is a bad thing. Tom...

    11. Re:Checks by mdwh2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Although useful, and I do often do that myself, it's a long way of replacing cheques in all situations:

      What if I want to give someone money when I don't have an Internet connection? (Similarly with a wire - I can't believe that the OP of this thread thinks going into a bank is easier than just writing out a cheque, although maybe these things have different names in the UK to the US?)

      Or what if I don't have the security keypad device thing that my bank requires me to use? Or I don't have access to the strong passwords on me at that moment? What if the bank introduces new security measures, and you can't access the website until then (yes, mad as it sounds, Barclays pulled this one on me, when they started requiring the aforementioned keypad device things).

      What if the website's "down for maintenance"?

      What about liability? In the UK, there have been cases of people paying the wrong person, and it's their fault because they're the ones who typed it in - the recipient legally is entitled to the money. If there's a mistake due to the bank person typing it in wrong, it's harder for them to argue this.

      Give me something that satisifies all of those, and I'll throw away my chequebook. Remember that most of the pain for dealing with a cheque is on the recipient - what incentive do I have to take on the issues listed above, if I'm giving someone money? (Of course if someone's able to accept cards, that's fine, but this doesn't work for personal transactions and some small businesses like B&Bs.)

    12. Re:Checks by JayGuerette · · Score: 2, Informative

      Checks may seem "quaint" to you techies, but vast swaths of America's infrastructure and social mechanisms are still greased this way. Checks are superior to cash in too many ways: if I'm carrying my checkbook, I'm technically carrying as much cash as I have, and the recipient doesn't have to make change. If I send my kids to school with a check, lost,stolen, or "misdirected" is not an issue. Plus, I always have a receipt.

      I've been doing this for years through my credit union, with my flatbed scanner. With cell phones commonly pushing over the 3 megapixel mark, it's not at all surprising to see this as a natural extension of the existing process.

    13. Re:Checks by apoc.famine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need a better credit card.

      I've got one from my credit union. There are no fees. The intrest rate (not that it often applies to me) is reasonable. I have my paycheck direct deposited, and have the option to automatically funnel some amount of money to my card every month. (Since I pay it off every month, I don't.) When I want to pay, it's three clicks and done.

      And there are no fees. For anything but overdrafts.

      Stop banking with criminals and thieves. It's stupid.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    14. Re:Checks by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people don't treat their house like an ATM. Oh, well some did, and now they're fucked. That's why credit cards are higher interest, BTW. They're unsecured, meaning that if I don't pay, I also won't lose my house, but because they're unsecured its a bigger risk for the bank.

      Anyhow... running up 100,000 in debt by having a card linked to your house is a terrible idea.

      Most people don't use checks here though; if I need to lend a friend money I have cash. For anything else, I have a debit card tied to my bank account.

    15. Re:Checks by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cheques are a pain to receive, but I'd rather that than everyone switching to Paypal, and being dependent on them.

      I used them, until they randomly decided they wouldn't accept my cards anymore, no reason given. They have no means of contact, so that was that.

      They behave like a bank and people use them like a bank, but the problem is they're not, AFAIK, subject to the same rules as banks.

      when the U.S. could move to a much better system

      What system is that? Not Paypal, I hope.

    16. Re:Checks by jollespm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Might want to check out a credit union. They may not have as many ATM locations, but I get free bill pay, ATM fee reimbursement (I get the $2.00 back BoA charges to use their ATM!), and high interest checking from LGECCU. Any fees I do get charged like overdraft, are fairly reasonable compared to a big bank.

      The fact that companies charge you to make electronic payments is criminal. Luckily, Progressive is the only company I deal with that does that to me.

    17. Re:Checks by clone53421 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh, and what's up with paying huge interest-rates on a "credit card" when most people have a much cheaper line of credit backed by their house anyways ? How does it make sense to borrow from the credit-card-company and pay 10% interest or something, when mortgage-rates are a third that ?

      Eh? I pay -ZERO- interest on my credit card. I just pay the balance every month.

      Credit cards are not loans and if you use them as if they were, you’re an idiot. It doesn’t make sense to borrow from the credit card company and pay 14% (or higher) interest. You aren’t supposed to.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    18. Re:Checks by sopssa · · Score: 2, Informative

      What if I want to give someone money when I don't have an Internet connection? (Similarly with a wire - I can't believe that the OP of this thread thinks going into a bank is easier than just writing out a cheque, although maybe these things have different names in the UK to the US?)

      Then you give him cash or tell him you transfer it from your bank account. Wire transfer (or it's closer to ACH I guess) everyone mostly does from Internet now a days. There's no need to go to bank just to transfer money (while it still of course is a possibility)

      Or what if I don't have the security keypad device thing that my bank requires me to use? Or I don't have access to the strong passwords on me at that moment? What if the bank introduces new security measures, and you can't access the website until then (yes, mad as it sounds, Barclays pulled this one on me, when they started requiring the aforementioned keypad device things).

      We use two level one-time pin lists. Other one is running one-time list to login to bank account, and the other one additional list to confirm payments. Secure and easy and there's no need to change it (and I can't understand why US banks don't use the same kind of system).

      What if the website's "down for maintenance"?

      They rarely are. If one bank happens to be down a few hours during night time it's usually mentioned in news too. Bank's aren't run off someones basement, you know.

      What about liability? In the UK, there have been cases of people paying the wrong person, and it's their fault because they're the ones who typed it in - the recipient legally is entitled to the money.

      It's illegal to keep money not send to you. If you're mistakenly send money to a wrong person and they haven't send it back, you contact bank and they contact the recipient (or his bank if it's not the same bank) and ask to send it back. Unless they do in reasonable amount of time, it's a criminal matter and will be liable if theres no good reason (ie., on holiday so didn't receive letter or call and so on)

    19. Re:Checks by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      USA is insane. I mean, the entire cheque-thing ? Hello ? As if it's not ridicolous to begin with, do you send email by handwriting it on paper, then taking a PHOTO of the letter, and sending that to your friend ? No ? Then why is doing the same thing with cheques reasonable ?

      Well, checks do have some advantages

      I can simply write one for a service instead of having to gain internet access, find the person's account and transfer the balance. Do I really want to do that for every transaction. No; I prefer deciding when to use electronic transfer.

      I can avoid giving out my bank account information - I deposit checks simply by scanning them into my account; I don't have to provide everyone that sends me money with my account details; the security of which becomes questionable as more people have access to it.

      I have a scanned copy of every check I wrote and was paid; if a question arises about payment I can prove they got paid.

      I like being able to chose how I pay; rather than have someone tell me I can only use their desired system.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    20. Re:Checks by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I file a tax return, for the govt. to deposit my return to my account via a wire transfer I am charged a wire transfer fee.

      You're doing it wrong, then. The IRS sent my refund straight to my checking account, and it didn't cost a dime. All I did was fill in the routing and account numbers on my 1040. I could've had them cut a check and mail it to me, but the electronic transfer is faster. The full amount of the refund was deposited in my account, with nothing taken out for fees.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    21. Re:Checks by misexistentialist · · Score: 2, Informative

      ING--admittedly not really a US bank--does "Person2Person" transfers for free.

    22. Re:Checks by businessnerd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As someone who uses both a credit union and a bank, I recently had a discussion with the credit union about switching my checking over to the credit union. My first question was ATM availability and fees. This pretty much decided it. As someone who travels constantly for work, I need ATMs available without fees in most of the country. The credit union had plenty of ATMs where I live, but none outside of that area. While they offered 8 free transactions at out-of-network ATMs, that wasn't good enough for someone who travels weekly. On top of that, the actual ATM fee was higher than what my current bank charges. I don't get reimbursed for ATM fees, so this expense adds up very quickly.

      The other factor was online banking. The credit union's web site is terrible and their online bill pay tools even worse. I pay all of my bills online and even send checks to individuals via the online bill pay (saves the cost of both checks and stamps). Not having decent tools for this is a deal breaker. Granted, the credit union is not all bad. They gave me a very competitive rate on an auto loan, but then at the same time, paying that loan is not as easy as it was when I had a loan with Volkswagen Credit. I hear a lot of people touting the superiority of credit unions over banks, but I have yet to see any evidence of this for my own banking needs.

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
  2. Cheques? by unixcrab · · Score: 3, Funny

    Those are those paper thingies that nobody seems to accept these days aren't they?

  3. Oh yeah, great idea by Pojut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just what I want on my cell phone...a picture of a piece of paper that has my checking account number and bank routing number on it. ::eye roll::

    1. Re:Oh yeah, great idea by Lev13than · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just what I want on my cell phone...a picture of a piece of paper that has my checking account number and bank routing number on it. ::eye roll::

      Everyone you have ever given a cheque to already has your account number, bank routing number and home address. Despite the little lock watermark and "micro-printing", cheques are 100% non-secure and should be treated as such. At least the iPhone has a four-digit password to protect it...

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    2. Re:Oh yeah, great idea by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a checkbook that I got from my bank when I opened my first checking account when I turned 16 (almost 10 years ago)...and every one of those checks are still attatched to their little booklets:-)

    3. Re:Oh yeah, great idea by jittles · · Score: 4, Informative

      USAA Bank app for the iPhone already lets you do this. You don't actually save the image to your phone, it is stored in RAM and then immediately transmitted over the air to the bank servers (hopefully encrypted but who knows?).

    4. Re:Oh yeah, great idea by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      checks are supposed to have magnetic ink for the MICR code on the bottom.. Problem is that buying a drum of magnetic toner to print fake checks is trivial. and with scumbag companies like quicken selling blank check paper to anyone, you have a super easy way of faking checks with a $30.00 used laser printer and a $100.00 thowaway computer.

      Shit scan someone signature and you can completely fake the check in gimp without effort.

      Paper checks needed to be done away with 50 years ago, the greedy banks simple dont want to do wire transfers for free to each other, they love being able to rape their customers with those made-up fees.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Oh yeah, great idea by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I fully agree with the above two posts. It seems to be something particularly specific to Apple - e.g., also people referring to their "MacBook" or indeed "Mac" rather than generic terms like laptop, computer or PC. You can always tell an Iphone user, as they'll get out their phone and make a big thing of "I'm going to check a website On My Iphone" as so on, as if this was some impressive feat (it was impressive in 2001; it became bog standard on any old phone by about 2005). This probably helps lead to the myth that Apple are most popular, as the 95% with Nokias, Motorolas and so on simply don't mention it.

      I wonder if these are the same people that hold their phones and beer bottles so everyone else can see the logo.

      I'm surprised Apple haven't added a projector, so that the Apple logo can be projected onto a nearby wall, everytime they get out their phone.

      It's even more bizarre and annoying when you get these people referring to "Iphone style devices". Yes, if only we had a generic term for the type of device that the Iphone was...

  4. Checks! by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another technology where the US is the world leader!

    Go USA! Go USA!

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Checks! by dunezone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please the chant is...

      USA! USA! USA!

      Obviously you are traitor, commie, or even worse a socialist.

    2. Re:Checks! by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously you are traitor, commie, or even worse a socialist.

      If by that you mean foreigner, then you are correct.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  5. USAA has been doing this for years by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 5, Informative

    USAA has offered "Deposit@Home" for years. Instead of taking a photo you can just scan the check and upload it. The only problem is they require you to have a credit card with them as well to qualify for the service. Hopefully, if other banks offer this service for free than USAA will change that policy. I hate having to mail in checks and sit around for two weeks waiting for them to deposit it.

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    1. Re:USAA has been doing this for years by japhering · · Score: 2, Interesting

      USAA has offered "Deposit@Home" for years. Instead of taking a photo you can just scan the check and upload it. The only problem is they require you to have a credit card with them as well to qualify for the service. Hopefully, if other banks offer this service for free than USAA will change that policy. I hate having to mail in checks and sit around for two weeks waiting for them to deposit it.

      USAA has been offering services via cell phone including check deposits for better than a year now. Everything you can do via computer and the web you can do via cell phone

    2. Re:USAA has been doing this for years by vekrander · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only reason for mailing here is that USAA doesn't have physical branches in every state but is still available there. Of course to remedy that you can deposit@home with a scanner as I have for two years without any issues. Also, they credit your account instantly as well. Then when you need to go to an ATM and you get charged fees for using one that isn't in your banks network, they pay fee on your behalf. Overall, I would rate them very successful as far as doing everything I used to do at my physical bank, except the convenience is better. Now why would someone use a bank that they can't physically go to? Personally, I do it for the customer service. I'm not sure exactly how their banking branch is, but their insurance branch is owned by the policy holders, which I also am a member of and the service there is what convinced me to use them as my financial institution. Either way, they've proved to me that there are many less reasons to need a physical bank now.

  6. meh, should have used USAA by TheDawgLives · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been doing this for months using USAA's iPhone app. When I showed my mom, she went out and got an iPhone and started using it. Before that I used their deposit@home service to scan checks on my computer. Beats driving to the bank just to deposit a check.

    --
    -TheDawgLives suckitdown
  7. Scanning a check exists now by yog · · Score: 4, Informative

    USAA lets me scan a check for instant deposit using a Windows browser, a Java applet and an attached scanner.

    I'm a Linux kind of guy and, sadly, I have not found a way to make it work on my Ubuntu and Suse systems. But, it works great with my Windows laptop and it's simply the next best thing to direct deposit.

    Obviously, a good secure app for smartphones (hopefully one is coming soon for Android but they've only announced for iPhone so far) will be a step beyond the scanner approach.

    I kind of like the idea that someone hands me a check, and by the time they have closed their briefcase I have already made the deposit. No more canceling. It would be interesting to see if they can determine whether the check is good or not, and send instant feedback.

    The next step is going to be depositing cash. I would love to be able to quickly scan my cash into my account, and then tear up the paper money (honors system). Hmm; gotta think that one through a bit more.

    --
    it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    1. Re:Scanning a check exists now by spvo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Almost all the checks I cash are rebates, which USAA's applet can't handle, so I have to mail everything in anyway. But I did manage to get it working with linux. All I had to do was change my useragent string (useragent plug-in) to firefox on a mac and it will just prompt you to upload the jpeg image of your check.

  8. I hate cheques! by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First off, why would people be critical of eliminating float?! This is the worst part of using cheques -- sort of like making a "credit" purchase on a debit card. If I'm paying someone, I want them to take the money out of my account NOW so that my balance updates immediately. Of course, no one really takes cheques anyway except for leasing offices and the like -- people who know where you live without a shadow of a doubt. I only ever write cheques for my leasing office, which is why I'm still on the same box I've had since I was 18... which reminds me, I sort of need to get some more.

  9. It must be at least 10 years ago by badger.foo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In Europe, checks are rare if not extinct, for something like the last 10 years at least. Direct transfers (IBAN) or similar just work and most people here do their banking mainly online anyhow.

    Most likely you could talk your bank here into issuing a check for you if you ask them nicely, but it would almost certainly be more expensive than a straight electronic transfer.

    On the other hand, somebody likely had fun and made a modest amount of money developing that check scannin app, so the effort I guess is not totally wasted.

    --
    -- That grumpy BSD guy - http://bsdly.blogspot.com/
  10. Why not all electronic? No really, why not? by tomalpha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean this as a genuine question: why is the US so far behind Europe in this?

    I haven't seen a cheque in years. Is it too expensive to move everyone over to electronic transfers (surely it's cheaper to get rid of cheque processing)? Too difficult to change the habits of a large population quickly? Concerns about fraud? Plain unwillingness to change? It can't be the recent banking crisis because we had that too...

    1. Re:Why not all electronic? No really, why not? by cyn1c77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I mean this as a genuine question: why is the US so far behind Europe in this?

      I have an answer for you in the form of another question: Is the US actually ahead of Europe in any aspect of life?

      (And I am asking that as an American.)

    2. Re:Why not all electronic? No really, why not? by Pro777 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is definitely one. Free public bathrooms.

    3. Re:Why not all electronic? No really, why not? by jimicus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes. We still have the freedom to own a firearm,

      I don't have that unless I get a license and deal with a whole lot of legislation.

      choose where to live,

      I can live anywhere I please in the EU. What makes you think I can't?

      express religious and political opinions without being jailed,

      I can do this. What makes you think I can't?

      choose our own doctors,

      I can do this. What makes you think I can't?

      choose whether to buy health insurance,

      I can, if I so choose, buy private health insurance. Though for some idiot reason, many private insurance policies don't cover diagnostic procedures and finding out what's wrong with you is half the battle on the NHS. There's no legislative reason for the private insurers to refuse to cover diagnostic procedures, they're just wankers like that.

      and choose where to go to college-- this week anyway. Next week? Who knows.

      I did choose where to go to college. As did my brother. In both of our cases, a major part of the decision making process was "at least 100 miles away from here".

      Seriously, are you trolling or do you have some vision of Europe as being a dystopia where everyone is told what to eat, what to think and how to shit from cradle to grave?

    4. Re:Why not all electronic? No really, why not? by HopefulIntern · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, to add to your point, owning a firearm (well, a shotgun anyway) in the UK is not very long-winded and difficult. However, other European countries have different laws on this matter. Norway requires you to take a hunting license, which encompasses vast knowledge of the surrounding wildlife and what can be hunted, etc. The idea that you can get a gun just "for no reason" or "for home protection" doesn't really fly.

    5. Re:Why not all electronic? No really, why not? by Kapiti+Kid · · Score: 2, Funny

      You still have public baths? And you think this shows you are advanced? Here, all homes have baths and/or showers.

    6. Re:Why not all electronic? No really, why not? by cmseagle · · Score: 2, Insightful
    7. Re:Why not all electronic? No really, why not? by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 2, Funny

      Toilet seat covers :). I really miss those when I go back home to Spain.

  11. Been using it for 6mos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have had this option with usaa.com for almost a year now, and it's GREAT. As for the photo, it is NOT saved in your phone, ever. Once the bank accepts the images, it instructs you to write VOID on the check and shredd it. Quite nice to be able to drop a check in within minutes of receiving it, and use it too!

  12. If you can't join USAA by mahsah · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some credit unions offer this service as well; I'm using Alliant Credit union's eDepositplus and its working great. You just need to donate to a PTA or certain charities to join, not hard at all.

  13. Checks are "old school" by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hardly ever use checks these days. Can I just take a picture of some cash and deposit it instead?

  14. old news? by horatio · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can already do this at USAA Bank. My sister has had this option for a few years now. USAA has recently added the ability to snap a photo and make a deposit from your iPhone.

    --
    There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
  15. Digital Credit Union by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not only do you get some sort of possible bizzare nerd cred for using DEC's old credit union, but just like USAA, you've been able to deposit via check for about 3 years now. Sure DCU has no snazzy iPhone app, but, damned if i've ever lived near one of their banks in my lifetime.

  16. Pentagon Federal Credit Union by WyrdOne · · Score: 3, Informative

    We are in the process of rolling out this same sort of program at our company as well (as I've been building about a dozen servers to support it). We've had the ability to deposit by mail for ages and this is the next logical step.

    With most of our userbase being military and deployed to locations where they cannot access any branch services at all. Our userbase has become tech savvy enough to support a system like this. The largest impediment to implementing a system like this has been having the tech easy enough to use a "non-geek" can perform the tasks necessary without needing a large amount of training.

    To those saying "What if I want to deposit counterfit checks". Well several systems are in place to prevent or at least mitigate that damage. You are only allowed to deposit up to a certain amount via the system (and have funds immediately accessible), the checks are processed real-time and won't be accepted without several validity checks passing and the account money is being collected from also happens as close to real-time as possible. Remember, just cause you deposit a check doesn't mean it can't bounce, that money is not truely in your account until funds are transferred from the check writers account. If you have those funds available for use immediately, it's because your financial institution trusts you to now deposit bad checks.

    The the comment above about "great, just what I want, images of checks on my phone". The application itself handles taking the photo and no local copy is retained on the phone after the process is completed. (The image of the check is still available on the company's servers for review just like if you mailed in checks or deposited them via our branches.)

  17. Re:$25 to transfer money to a friend?! by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great, but what idiot trusts paypal with their money?

  18. Re:$25 to transfer money to a friend?! by rapiddescent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The US banking system is basically where we (UK) were in the 1980's. I even saw someone writing a check in a supermarket when I was in the US recently! I haven't written a cheque for many years and, in fact, APACS will be outlawing cheques here in 2012. The US banking system is much more fragmented in the USA and doesn't have the regulatory structure and capital guarantee that UK banks have to have. Some banks only span a few towns (although these are disappearing) and don't have a national presence. They still have "bank managers" too and you can go in an "speak to them" - Most UK branches haven't had this for years.

    It's only since "faster payments" was introduced a 4 years ago that person to person payments using online banking etc have really taken off. I don't think any of the big UK banks charge for faster payments. Of course, you can have fun sending 0.01 to your friends with a transfer label "goats.cx" etc.

    They also don't have the concept of "direct debit". something that astounds me. You either have to go to an online bill consolidator service of have to pay each bill (sending a cheque!!!!) individually!

  19. Re:$25 to transfer money to a friend?! by Jenming · · Score: 4, Informative

    Internet Banking and Wire Transfers are different things in the US. If I want to pay a bill or transfer money to another person in the US using Internet Banking I can do so for free. Either the money will be transfered electronically using ACH, intrabank transfer or my bank will just write and mail a check to the person.

    --
    Morpheus, God of Dreams.
  20. Re:$25 to transfer money to a friend?! by dekemoose · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Banks used to make their money by loaning the money you deposit to other people at higher prices. Interest rates being what they are today it's hard to make the kind of profits that banks are accustomed to that way. They're far more likely to make money by charging various fees, paying you nothing for your deposits and investing your deposits in high paying (assuming they don't fail) risky investment opportunities. In spite of the promise of financial system reform this is very likely to continue.

  21. What do you mean "soon?" by DrOct · · Score: 2, Informative

    USAA customers have been able to do this with their mobile phones for quite a long time now. They've also been able to use scanners and software at home to do it for even longer (years).

  22. Re:$25 to transfer money to a friend?! by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They also don't have the concept of "direct debit". something that astounds me.

    Every service that I need to pay for, from my gas utility, electric utility, student loan, and credit card bill can be paid directly at the company's website as a direct debt. I enter my routing and checking account numbers, and the bill gets deducted from my bank account.

    I think you misunderstand what "Direct Debit" means in the UK. Direct Debit is basically a system where you authorise a company to withdraw money from your account each month. This is very similar to a standing order (where you instruct your bank "transfer X amount to another bank account on this day each week/month/year") except that for Direct Debits the amount to withdraw is determined by the recipient of the payment.

    This means that my phone bill is automatically paid in full each month, even though it is not a fixed amount. I don't have to do anything after the DD is initially set up - no logging into the telco's website to organise the transfer each month, etc.

    On the face of it, DD sounds like a security nightmare since you're basically authorising a third party to withdraw however much they like from your account. But it is backed by the direct debit guarantee, which is a legal requirement for the bank to protect you from fraudulent transactions and immediately refund you if there is any dispute. So from the consumer's point of view, the security is reasonable.

    Pretty much all regular bill payments can be done by direct debit or standing order, so the need to actually go and pay it manually (whether that is by handing over cash, a cheque or organising an electronic transfer each month) is pretty much non-existent.

  23. USAA Also Allows iPhone Deposits by pgrady7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    USAA allows account holders to take a picture of a check with an iPhone and has for about a year. Now if I only had an iPhone... .

  24. USAA FTW by gront · · Score: 2, Informative

    USAA also has deposit@home, you can scan a check with yer handy dandy scanner and e-deposit it e-electronically without going to the bank. One could email you a jpg of the endorsed check and you could deposit it without the hassle of postage, if you were so inclined.

  25. Re:$25 to transfer money to a friend?! by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Informative
    "I think you misunderstand what "Direct Debit" means in the UK. Direct Debit is basically a system where you authorise a company to withdraw money from your account each month. This is very similar to a standing order (where you instruct your bank "transfer X amount to another bank account on this day each week/month/year") except that for Direct Debits the amount to withdraw is determined by the recipient of the payment."

    No, many companies have that over here in the US, especially the utilities, etc. I personally do NOT like this as that I don't like giving hardly anyone or any company direct access to my bank account.

    However, many banks here are offering free bill pay from the banks website, where if the company is hooked to the 'system' (I forget the name) when I set up a bill to pay it is often transferred from the bank to the company electronically in about 1-2 days. If the bill to pay is a person or company not in their electronic system, the bank cuts them a physical check and mails it to them..free of charge.

    As for automatic payments!??!

    Eeek...not me. I like to see exactly what the bill is for everything, and pay the amounts out myself. Heck, what happens if you make a mistake in checking somehow...and your funds are lower than thought..and all those automatic bill payments come in and cause numerouse NSF (insufficient funds) penalties?? That can cost you serious cash since those can often be $25 - $39+ per overdraft.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........