Slashdot Mirror


Killer Convicted, Using Dog DNA Database

lee1 writes "It turns out that the UK has a DNA database — for dogs. And this database was recently used to apprehend a South London gang member who used his dog to catch a 16-year-old rival and hold him while he stabbed him to death. The dog was also accidentally stabbed, and left blood at the scene. The creation of human DNA databases has led to widespread debates on privacy; but what about the collation of DNA from dogs or other animals?"

1 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Yes, there are privacy implications by Smauler · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not all dogs are registered - to be honest I didn't even know of this database. Unless they actually test clandestinely (perhaps at the vet's), none of the dogs I know are on the database. There have been recent proposals however about compulsary insurance for dogs, which fortunately seem to be not being put through because of their unpopularity and the coming election. Why the fuck they needed the dog's DNA anyway, is confusing. From the BBC:

    Johnson was arrested as he fled from the scene of the murder in Larkhall Park bare-chested and covered in blood.
    New technology, used for the first time, proved by a billion-to-one probability that some of the blood came from his pit bull-mastiff crossbreed dog, Tyson, which had been knifed during the attack.
    The rest was shown to come from the teenage murder victim.

    FFS, it doesn't take Poirot + CSI to figure this one out, does it?