Slashdot Mirror


Business-Suitable Document Authentication System?

ram.loss writes "The company I work for has decided to go paperless for all memos and internal correspondence. In addition to the central administration, the company has three more or less autonomous, physically separated divisions; that means we do not have a common IT infrastructure across all of them. Since I am the only resemblance we have to an IT department at my division, I have been commissioned with evaluating the available technology to manage and authenticate all correspondence, although it is not my area of expertise (I have a CompSci degree, but for many years have specialized in transportation modeling software). My initial thought was to use a document management system like Plone (this is the system I'm familiar with); from what I have read, that would take care of the management part, but what about authentication? We need each document to be signed, and a fully auditable system that keeps track of who signed what document, who received it and when. It also must take into account the handling of external correspondence in the future, where a recipient outside the company must have the means to return an authenticated document as a response. I'm aware that I'm leaving out a lot of details, like how the documents will be signed, the legal implications, etc., but for the time being I'm only interested in the experiences of the Slashdot crowd with such systems, and hopefully finding out enough information to hand over the matter to (or hiring) somebody more qualified, once I know what to look for. Has anybody out there used a similar system? Am I in way over my head?"

3 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. What? Are you trying to do? by Manip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like you have serious requirement overload. You need to go back and ask them what they ACTUALLY want.

    For example, what is a "document?" Who is signing it? How long should the audit trail be? How many millions are you investing in this needlessly complex internal system?

    What you're after simply doesn't exist and likely never will. Even if it did implementing it would be hugely expensive and time consuming.

    What I don't understand is how this can replacing a paper system? Paper systems lack almost all of the features you requested... So clearly do do not NEED this stuff and thus we came around full circle to requirement overload.
     

    1. Re:What? Are you trying to do? by twisteddk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I couldn't agree more. As a comp.sci. major, you should be able to ask the questions of: What, why, where and who (and today probably also, how much).

      You need to get a decent requirement spec going, and from then on choose the system you want. There's no need to spend more money and time on features or systems that wont be used. Buying a fully fledged EDHS would be nuts if you can make due with a common fileserver and an intranet bulletin board system. Also, you might want to look at the business you're supporting, maybe there's an industry standard that might be handy to keep up with if you suddenly need to cooperate with, buy or be bought by someone else in the industry.

      Also, you'd want to mimic the current working processes as closely as possible. There's nothing more deadly to a project than employees unwilling to adapt to new systems. So make the system cater to their needs instead of making them having to do things differently. Include key personel in the implementation or descision process, so that they feel that their needs are being heard and met, so they will welcome the new system. Social engineering isn't just a skill for politicians, it's one for developers too ;)

      --
      --- To err is human... Am I more human than most ?
  2. Re:SharePoint by klubar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    SharePoint is underrated-- it really has gotten pretty goood. Although you say that the firm doesn't have a common infrastructure, it's likely that you've standardized on Microsoft Office. If you're using (or can upgrade to) Office 2007 (or 2010), sharepoint plays extremely well with Office. SharePoint will handle all your office documents. If you need a comprehensive solution for scanned paper or integration with other applications, I'd look at some of the commercial document management solutioms (Documentum).

    Don't cheap out and try to put together some homebrew solution. Remember as Click and Clack the Tappit Brothers say, it's the cheap man/women who spends the most.