Slashdot Mirror


US Law Firms Targeted By Cyberscams

Hugh Pickens writes "The San Francisco Chronicle reports that last year a Long Beach law firm received an e-mail from a Hong Kong businessman seeking help collecting debts from American customers. After a month of signing paperwork and exchanging telephone calls, the attorney received word that one debtor had sent a $200,000 cashier's check to pay off his balance. The attorney deposited it in his firm's account, subtracted his $10,000 fee and wired the remaining $190,000 to his Hong Kong client. Then the attorney's bank called and told him the $200,000 check had bounced. 'They send me a nice, big, worthless check,' says the attorney. In this case, the bank was able to prevent the wire transfer from reaching its destination, but attorneys say they are on the receiving end of sophisticated scams with increasing frequency that include attacks to steal client data that can be sold or used to learn the details of future litigation."

2 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. How About ... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... no one sends anyone else any money until they verify that the check they've received is good?

    The first time I get payment from a client I always wait to see if it clears before moving forward on a project. It's one of the reasons we require deposits before starting work.

    1. Re:How About ... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmm, the solution to this problems seems obvious.

      Once a bank tells you that a check you deposited is valid, the bank is now liable for that deposit. If the check ends up being fraudulent in this case, the bank is out the $200,000, not the customer who deposited it.

      If we change the law so this is the case, banks will be a lot more thorough about checking the validity of deposited checks. Trust me. :)