Slashdot Mirror


Google vs. China — Who's Got the Most To Lose?

Barence writes "Google looks set to pull out of China, but who will suffer most? The search engine or China? At last week's South by Southwest conference, Kaiser Kuo, a former director of digital strategy for the Ogilvy & Mather advertising agency in China, gave an illuminating talk that examined the history of Google and other Western internet firms in China, their relationship with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and the likely outcomes of the current stalemate. Kuo explained that Google had earned the respect of the tech-savvy urban elite by protecting users, making censorship clear and by protecting its employees in China. That means Google is walking away from a 35% market share, which contains a far wealthier demographic than local provider Baidu. The Government, meanwhile, which has been very pro-competition, is about to hand a complete monopoly to Baidu, harm its international standing and the development of net technologies in the country. Is it a lose-lose situation?"

15 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Microsoft wins by gksmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google loses, China's reputation will recover after a blip, and Microsoft is waiting with Bing.

    1. Re:Microsoft wins by erroneus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, from a U.S. perspective, the words "Google did it, why won't you?" are likely to be repeated over and over and over again when it comes to standing up to China and its policies.

      As the U.S. government and other entities have questioned companies doing business in China about their stance and involvement in human rights violations, the stock answer has been "we are just following the law." That stock answer will no longer fly as a company, in this case Google, will have shown what may be interpreted as "conscience" or "ethical behavior" when it comes to dealing with Chinese policy.

    2. Re:Microsoft wins by erroneus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most people in the U.S. idolize heroes and men in wearing white hats even if our day-to-day behavior doesn't reflect that. We are hero worshippers and we won't find it difficult to latch onto Google for taking a stand in favor of human rights if that is the way this will be painted. (And I believe it will be painted that way here in the U.S.)

    3. Re:Microsoft wins by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ethical investing is a niche market. We in America value the almighty dollar above all else, and not without reason.

      Actually, divesting or disinvestment has become a big deal for businesses and investment funds.
      The idea is to target businesses/funds involved in countries with poor human rights or totalitarian governments.

      South Africa (because of apartheid) was the first country to come under sustained non-governmental economic pressure.
      Off the top of my head: Iran, Israel, Sudan, N. Korea, Syria, Zimbabwe, and Myanmar have all been targets.
      Use the Google and you can read more about it. It isn't nearly the niche field you portray it as.
      /Of course, when US money leaves, Russia and China usually fill the void.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  2. Breaking news! by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not even a link to a story yet, but the ticker on the BBC News home page is reporting that Google has announced that it has stopped censoring its search engine in China. Since China has already made her position clear on this eventuality I suppose this must mean that Google believes that it might as well be hanged for a wolf, than a lamb.

    I'm nipping out for some popcorn; the next couple of days are going to be really interesting...

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:Breaking news! by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is a brilliant move that takes advantage of Hong Kong not having speech restrictions, yet also being a part of China. They are redirecting all their traffic to the google.com.hk website.

      The great thing is that China has based their entire argument on the fact that 'Google must obey the law,' and if they don't, they are not upholding the harmony of the country. Now Google has found a solution that is 100% legal. They are drawing attention to the fact that Hong Kong doesn't need censorship, and yet they are still able to maintain 'harmony'. The government is going to have to come up with a new argument for why they should censor Google's search engine. It will be interesting to see what they do.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Breaking news! by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So then it's official. Google is, officially anyway, pulling out of China. Can we now say "Good on you Google!" or do the cynics in the crowd demand that we wait until google.com.hk is actually blocked by China before we express our support?

    3. Re:Breaking news! by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Propaganda is powerful, but it has limits. My understanding is that no one in the USSR believed the official news outlets by the end. They may not have known what was really going on all the time, but they knew the official news wasn't giving them the whole story.

      The more the government has to distort the truth in their message, the weaker their message will be.

      --
      Qxe4
  3. Freedom by turb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's a small part of me that would like to see other companies follow in the footsteps of Google. Get out of China. Just leave.

    Why?

    This is a poor example but I can't help using it. Remember South Africa? There was a time when quite a number of companies just didn't do business there given how that government was (not) working for it's people. I'd like to think this helped change things for the better in South Africa.

    It's not that I want to force my idea / style of government onto the people of China, but .. well .. besides North Korea and Cuba are there any other communistic states left? Would any people as a whole choose to convert to a communistic system. I'm thinking no.

    And in a way, walking away from China as a whole, send a bit of a wake up call to the Chinese that, "O by the way, we care about how people are treated. We care about freedom." They need to too. When people in a place such as China can see how things are elsewhere in the world, it can and should plant the seed for change for the better for China. Probably overly optimistic on my part but hey, it's something.

    Great grand internet firewalls need to go. Speech needs to be free.

  4. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    North American companies have a pretty easy ride on their own turf. When they expand overseas they tend to fail basic due diligance and continue doing whatever they like. When they're warned they're breaking the laws of the land, they'll arrogantly continue doing what ever they please. Occasionally, they'll get bitch slapped, but mostly receive a nominal fine. China are a little fussier than most countries, and google have just found out the hard way.

  5. Re:Google loses. Also: duh. by QuantumRiff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Or, Google keeps a Chinese language site, without any filtering. Let them look like asses for blocking it with their firewall that for some reason, they keep denying exists. Even keep the country code domain, until they force you to leave. That sounds like one hell of a trade dispute with a country that NEEDS a "favored nation" status with us. I still don't understand why google doesn't just remove themselves from the country, but still have a presence easily reached by Chinese citizens. (kind of like gambling sites, that are illegal for US citizens, which is against treaties, and we got a multi-billion judgement against us for)

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  6. Re:Google by Ephemeriis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Google has the most to lose because they are a company and China is a country.

    Google will make its profit, but not as much as if it would have if it stayed in China.

    Of course Google also gets to look like the good guy... Tried to stand up for freedom and was smacked down by the mean ol' Chinese government... May actually get them some new customers that they might not have had before. At the very least all this press is good advertising.

    You're probably right... They're losing access to a huge market... But it's still possible that Google will wind up doing pretty well after all this. Sure, they'll lose some income... But how much were they spending (not just in money) to keep things up and running in China? Obviously Google thinks the cost outweighs the benefit.

    China will make itself whatever its government wants it to become where Google is around or not.

    You seem to think that a government can miraculously transform itself into anything it wants, and automatically be successful. That is not true.

    Sure, the Chinese government is pretty damn stable. It is unlikely to topple because of this Google thing. And they'll release plenty of propaganda that will likely make them look even better in the eyes of the Chinese public...

    But this has to hurt their international image. They're so repressive that Google couldn't even do business with them. I'm sure plenty of other companies will think twice before opening offices in China.

    There are probably plenty of citizens who've gotten used to Google, and will feel its absence as well. Not to mention the folks who were employed by Google.

    I don't honestly believe that any of that will amount to a whole hell of a lot... Google's just a search engine, I doubt if they'll have that much of an impact... But there will be an impact. Both within China and without.

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  7. I'll take the unpopular decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And say China loses. Why? China needs the US more than the US needs China. If China pulled out their investments, it would drop the value of the US dollar, which could have the effect of jumpstarting the stagnant US economy by making it suddenly a lot cheaper to relocate jobs into the US (much like how it is with China and their practice of artificially suppressing the value of their currency by 40-50% and gaming the free trade deals with monetary policy). On the other hand, China really, really needs the US market as a result of focusing so heavily on doing business here. Too many companies are set up entirely to deliver services to the US. You pull out the rug on that, those businesses fail and China is stuck scrambling to find some other country as wealthy as the US willing to go into debt with China...which isn't exactly likely. China's investments in the US wouldn't be worth nearly as much as they paid in for. American companies could buy those investments back at a price lower than they were originally sold off for.

    What does that have to do with Google? When China's government decides that it can interfere in the practices and control of a private company's product, especially a worldwide recognizable one like Google, which has been operating legitimately within all trade treaties, and even go so far as to hack the systems of a foreign corporation, it brings the whole world's attention back to China...especially the US. It gives the US government more political capital and support to go after the monetary practices that China has used to vault itself to a world economic superpower. Considering the current financial situation in the US, it really has a lot less to lose than China and a whole lot more to gain, despite the debt that the US owes. China's best policy is to operate quietly and keep building wealth and remain inconspicuous...reminding the world every couple years that you're basically a dictatorship that brutally suppresses dissent (and while the US has had some glaring examples of doing similar acts, you can't sanely argue that the US is anywhere near as excessively repressive as China has been over the years) isn't exactly the best way to stay inconspicuous and make countries want to sign more trade treaties with you. It probably gives those other countries' leaders a lot of political capital to consider restructuring those existing treaties. It's a lot easier to gin up the citizens against a country that openly violates the privacy of your country's corporations than it is a country that plays fair. If a country plays fair, corporations that do business with those companies can easily lobby enough support to squash even the basic intent of trade policy reform.

  8. Google wins by hufter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google wins. They have convinced us that they "don't do evil", so we keep using their products and services and feel good about it. And they get positive publicity. Google was not the #1 search engine in china anyway. Chinese people can still use google.com. Maybe.

  9. Sort-term, or long-term? by jonadab · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Short-term, Google probably has more to lose (although, arguably, they also have more to *gain* by cutting ties with China; it certainly isn't going to do their reputation in the West any harm).

    In the long term, however, I think China has more to lose.
    Google is not the first company to decide doing business in China is More Trouble Than It's Worth. As it stands, a lot of people deal with China not because they're a pleasure to do business with, but because it "seems important", because China's so big. That's not a good basis for a solid relationship. If they continue doing just about everything they can think of to alienate people, China may eventually find themselves screaming "we're important, come do business with us" to a world that has lost the willingness to put up with their nonsense.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.