Slashdot Mirror


First Flight For SpaceShipTwo

mknewman writes "Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo rocket plane took to the air for the first time this [Monday] morning from California's Mojave Air and Space Port. The craft, which has been christened the VSS Enterprise, remained firmly attached to its WhiteKnightTwo carrier airplane throughout the nearly three-hour test flight. It will take many months of further tests before SpaceShipTwo actually goes into outer space. Nevertheless, today's outing marks an important milestone along a path that could take paying passengers to the final frontier as early as 2011 or 2012."

4 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Space with no space by socceroos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Being in a space suite is as close as we'll ever come to enjoying a 1 on 1 with good ole father space. I would say that even though you're merely an observer from an enclosed capsule, any travelers would indeed be enjoying the closest possible encounter with space.

  2. Re:Sub-Orbital == Final Frontier? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nonsense. The problem with the space race is that it was unsustainable. There was no way any nation would maintain that kind of spending for an extended period of time. We were spedning around three percent of GDP... for something with intangible payback.

    Now, we have the chance at sustainable flights into space. If this actually succeeds, and we have many flights going up every month... and if we actually get more than one company in this game... we will see gradual improvements. Instead of being a money pit, it will be a money generator. And that is where real progress is at.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  3. Re:Space with no space by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder what the probability is that a passing spacecraft would rescue you after 30 seconds exposed to vacuum?

  4. Re:Sub-Orbital == Final Frontier? by talcite · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was actually having an interesting conversation with a research policy advisor in my country last night about this topic.

    In her opinion, government research grants should be spent on fields which do not have immediate commercial value, because companies are likely unwilling to pursue it themselves and also because the future value of a technology is difficult to gauge.

    For example, when the transistor was invented, it was impossible to tell that one day they would be miniaturized to the point where handheld computers were available. Any attempt to place a value on the invention of the transistor would have massively undervalued it. Companies in the past may have pursued the approach of funding research for giggles, but the business model today has changed and almost everything needs to have profit making potential.

    Now there's no way to definitively determine whether a research field will be valuable in the future, but space exploration is probably one of the ones with a large potential. I say this because of the overlap with the rest of the aerospace industry, applications for telecommuncations and materials research.