Photoshop CS5's Showpiece — Content-Aware Fill
Barence writes "If you're looking for reasons to upgrade to Photoshop CS5 when it arrives, a new demo video might just persuade you. Narrated by Bryan O'Neil-Hughes, a product manager on the Photoshop team, the video shows the new content-aware fill tool, which has the potential to revolutionise the way you clean up photos. If you're not happy with an item in your picture, select it, delete it, and Photoshop will analyse the surrounding area and plug the gap as if it never existed."
Stalin would have just loved that content-aware fill tool.....
I wouldn't call this an ad. This is legitimately really fucking cool.
"16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
Fox News and the Texas board of Education.
Sounds like something Google Street View could use to remove people from their views and make them more acceptable.
It entered the land of bittorrent download and piracy years ago.
There, fixed it for you.
Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
Next up is the "CSI Enhance" tool. Take a photo of 10x10 pixels, and make it a perfect 2MP image.
I wonder what sort of a fig leaf it will use to plug the gap in the goatse photo...
I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
Color, I mean content-aware fill me impressed.
Liquid rescale is an implementation of the Seam Carving technology which was incorporated into Photoshop CS4 as a feature titled Content Aware Scale.
This new feature comes from an algorithm titled PatchMatch which was presented at SIGGRAPH 2009:
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes_2009_PAR/index.php
I wouldn't call this an ad. This is legitimately really fucking cool.
So is the Mr. Clean Magic Eraser...
Using Photoshop to remove lens flares? Oh! Brave new world!
-Peter
I see a 12 megapixel image in hand of a before and after and not a tiny less than 400 pixel overcompressed youtube video.
I have seen this automatic stuff before and when you look carefully at it it's not very clean unless you re-sample down to 1/4 the resolution or go small for web use.. it's never clean enough to print out at 11X17 or larger.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
noone wants to shell out $60 for 200 functions 20 of which they will use from time to time.
Personally, I'll shell out. I make a living using photoshop and I support the idea that a bunch of extremely talented software engineers ought to be able to make a living developing it.
Includes more detail about the algo
- Developed with researches at Princeton
- Demo'd at SIGGRAPH in Aug. 2009
- Old spot-healing tool tried to find one match for the hole; new tool copies multiple patches from the surrounding BG to fit into the hole, as well as finding & copying surrounding patterns
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9vbHRcrbdQ&feature=related
The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
Here's the paper, from a comment above.
So, what about Resynthesizer?
Ezekiel 23:20
Yes, clearly the images where Photoshopped. I could tell from some of the pixels and having seen quite a few Photoshops in my time... er, wait a minute...
I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
It's a very cool GIMP plugin for some things, but...
This is my source image:
http://s3.images.com/huge.28.142421.JPG
I want to remove the lady on the right, so I select her:
http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/1346/resynthesizerselection.jpg
And then, per the Resynthesizer page's recommendations, I use "Script-Fu/Enhance/Smart remove selection..."
http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/228/resynthesizerresultradi.jpg
Oh dear.
Anybody with access to the Photoshop beta feature want to give that image a stab? For all I know it fails just as spectacularly - but from the research it's based on, I highly suspect it'll fare better.