Slashdot Mirror


First Anti-Cancer Nanoparticle Trial On Humans a Success

An anonymous reader writes "Nanoparticles have been able to disable cancerous cells in living human bodies for the first time. The results are perfect so far, killing tumors with no side effects whatsoever. Mark Davis, project leader at CalTech, says that 'it sneaks in, evades the immune system, delivers the siRNA, and the disassembled components exit out.' Truly amazing."

11 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Finally.. by McGiraf · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... to start smoking ....

  2. Re:Finally.. by moteyalpha · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well I can finally go to California, everything is known to cause cancer in California,
    Or "its known to the State of California to cause cancer".
    I could never figure it out, so I just stay away from California.

  3. Re:SWEET SUCCESS by subanark · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Start smoking, paying $$$ for cigs
    2. Get cancer
    3. Pay $$$ for an operation to remove cancer cells
    4. ???
    5. Profit ?!?

  4. Re:SWEET SUCCESS by Statecraftsman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Camel Lights, now with siRNA Nanoparticles!

  5. Re:Nice if true by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gizmodo? Call me when a reputable publication reports on this.

    You came to Slashdot because Gizmodo isn't a reputable publication? Hehehe.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  6. Re:Nice if true by raddan · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, those hippies? I want something Fair and Balanced!

  7. Re:Artificial virus by gujo-odori · · Score: 4, Funny

    All that will accomplish is to fill the world with beautiful, bisexual nympho women who still aren't interested in you...

  8. Re:Isn't this... by newcastlejon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course they do: ENHANCE!

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  9. Re:Targetting by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great post. But please, can we stop using effect as a verb?

    No. We only need to effect such a change such that people stop using the verb "to effect" incorrectly.

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  10. Re:CmdrTaco's hung like a toddler by tzanger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Any technology which is distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.

  11. Re:Isn't this... by c0mpliant · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sir, the man was killed by tiny Nano particles
    Hmmm, I guess...
    In the end...
    It is the little things that matter

    --
    There is no -1 disagree