Slashdot Mirror


We're Staying In China, Says Microsoft

ericb tips an article at the Guardian which begins: "Hopes that Google's forthright stand on censorship in China would inspire other companies to follow suit appeared unfounded today, with the move instead threatening to widen the rift between some of the world's most powerful internet companies. Microsoft, which has considerable interests in the country, including its Bing search engine, responded directly to criticism by Google's co-founder Sergey Brin, who this week accused the company of speaking against human rights and free speech. Brin, who pressed for the closing down of Google's self-censored Chinese search engine, said yesterday: 'I'm very disappointed for them in particular. I would hope that larger companies would not put profit ahead of all else. Generally, companies should pay attention to how and where their products are used.' Microsoft rejected Brin's critique, saying it would continue to obey local laws on censorship in China."

28 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. The Best Kind of News by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Normally the news likes to hand you a big fat moral or ethical dilemma when you find out that your favorite product is made by Big Evil. But this is the best kind of news for me! The kind that further reaffirms my views on my most hated companies!

    Terrible news for the Chinese. Great news for my Down with Microsoft agenda! When you're chewing on life's gristle don't grumble, give a whistle!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Best Kind of News by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think Microsoft probably follows Commodore's Jack Tramiel policy: "Business is war," and in war anything is acceptable. Therefore they would view Google's leaving China as a victory, even if it means going-to-bed with the Chinese Socialist government.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:The Best Kind of News by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since when is china's government socialist? It is much closer to feudalism for the vast majority of china.

    3. Re:The Best Kind of News by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>>Google wasn't going anywhere in China

      That really doesn't have anything to do with what I said. There's a difference between selling product, and an outright decision to killoff (war against) your competition like MS did to Lotus, WordPerfect, Netscape, Opera, Java, Kerberos, DR-DOS (blocked by Windows), and on and on, via any means necessary even illegal ones.

      Or do you think MS was forced to appear before the US DOJ and European Union court systems just to have a friendly talk? c'mon. "Embrace, extend, and extinguish" is their motto. It's war. :-)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  2. Conflicted! by Sporkinum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am conflicted! I like Bing's policy on retention of searches, and dislike their China policy. I admire Google's new policy on China, but dislike their privacy policies in the US.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Conflicted! by Pojut · · Score: 3, Funny

      As with most products and services, it is night impossible to find anything that is just right...there's always a downside to everything.

      Well, except a good burp.

    2. Re:Conflicted! by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "I admire Google's new policy on China, but dislike their privacy policies in the US."
      Sorry but admiring Google for no longer censoring is like admiring someone for no longer beating their child.
      Yes I am glad it stopped but it should have never started.
      Also Google only did this after they got hacked the the government. I have for a long time stated that Google was doing evil.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Conflicted! by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bingo. They only discovered that they had principles after they got publicly bitch-slapped all over the trailer park. Some credit is due for them walking out rather than crawling back for another beating, hoping they could change China if they just loved them enough, but they should never have started dating them in the first place.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Conflicted! by pherthyl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> Sorry but admiring Google for no longer censoring is like admiring someone for no longer beating their child.

      That's not a good analogy at all. Much better would be to say "Admiring Google for no longer censoring is like admiring the one person that stopped beating their child, while everyone else continues to do so."

      We might not actually admire them, since we don't personally do business in China, so we can feel morally superior, but amongst their peers Google is doing an admirable thing.

  3. How good of them. by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's always nice to see companies following local laws.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:How good of them. by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's always nice to see companies following local laws.

      Examples of immoral behavior aside, yes it is.
      If a country has say, a ban on advertising cigarettes to children, then that's a perfectly sane thing to comply with.
      If a country doesn't have the draconian copyright laws the US has, refusing to enforce them there is perfectly sane as well.

      OTOH, assisting in silencing political speech is hardly moral. If only there was some universal minimum standard for what's okay and what's not...

      Oh right.. there is: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (Which didn't exist in the 1930's, although I don't feel that excuses IBM - considering the Allies penalized the German corporations who assisted the Holocaust)
      And from that declaration, it's entirely clear-cut the first two examples are fine, and the third isn't okay. While we all know that China doesn't give a damn about the UDHR, it doesn't change the fact that they've ratified it (and in fact, Nationalist China was involved in drafting it). They can't legitimately complain about 'cultural bias' or respecting their system or whatever.

      It's a matter of holding them to their own words. And holding our corporations responsible to follow at least those basic rights.

    2. Re:How good of them. by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seems kind of thin,
      It happened after the Nazi's took over IBM German subsidiary. Even the reference that they got technology and help from the Polish offices doesn't sound that damming since Germany had already INVADED Poland at the time. I doubt that IBM had any real control over those offices at the time it happened.

      IBM does have a long history of being the meanest nastiest competitor on the planet but I really think trying to blame them for the Holocaust is pretty unfounded.

      The oddest historical hookup I remember how well Ford worked with pre WWII USSR they did all sorts of deals with Stalin and company. Which if you think about it should really make your head hurt.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:How good of them. by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      IBM does have a long history of being the meanest nastiest competitor on the planet but I really think trying to blame them for the Holocaust is pretty unfounded.

      The service contract for the concentration camp management systems was written and served out of, and paid to, IBM in Armonk, NY. Nobody is blaming them for the holocaust; the whole thing was reported to the US government pretty early on, and those in power pretended nothing was happening, then acted surprised later.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. The true motives by e2d2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And now we see Google's true motivation. They had this much ->.- market share in China, so they pull out due to Moral reasons and toss the grenade over the fence to Microsoft. Microsoft, being the dip shits they are, catch the grenade and run for the end zone in their Heisman pose.

  5. Torn by tpstigers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm kind of torn by this whole China/Google/Microsoft thing. While I'm not a fan of the Chinese government, who are we to say what they should and shouldn't allow? Would we want a Chinese company to come into our country and tell our government what to do? While I've seen a great deal of discussion about human rights surrounding these stories, I've seen precious little about sovereignty.

    1. Re:Torn by Elros · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, we wouldn't. That said, we have plenty of commonly used services hosted outside the US for very similar reasons. To remain in China and refuse to sensor results would be illegal. To remain in China and continue to sensor results would be against their ethics. Thus, they followed the remaining option: Leave China.

    2. Re:Torn by FlyingBishop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What if the people really do want to kill all ethnic minorities? I mean, there are people who think all the Hispanics need to get out of the United States, right?

    3. Re:Torn by accessbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That would depend on whether you are prepared to recognize the sovereignty of totalitiarian dictatorships that torture and murder their own people. Dictators (and their cronies) have no right to say what may happen in their own country, let alone anyone else's. They lose those rights the moment they seize power. All Microsoft is doing is helping the Chinse dictatorship to oppress their own people. For the religious amongst us, think Judas and the money.

    4. Re:Torn by Angst+Badger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Would we want a Chinese company to come into our country and tell our government what to do? While I've seen a great deal of discussion about human rights surrounding these stories, I've seen precious little about sovereignty.

      If our government was as oppressive as the Chinese government, then hell yes, I'd like foreign powers to pressure our government to improve its human rights record. And if foreign powers weren't willing to step up to the plate, foreign companies would be welcome. I value my freedom a lot more than a bunch of primitive tribalism. And the last thing I'd want is a company like Microsoft to come in and collaborate with my oppressive government.

      As far as sovereignty goes, my view is that the legitimacy of a government, and hence its sovereignty, arises from the democratic will of a free people. There are no legitimate non-democratic states, so the question of mainland Chinese sovereignty is moot. The PRC is no more a legitimate state than the USSR was.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  6. A Good Thing? by corruptblitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe now that the people of China only have M$ as a search giant to choose from, people will flee and the regime will collapse so democracy can win again!

  7. Maybe they won't censor Chinese citizens by MrKaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe they are the world's knight in shining armor come to save the world from censorship and DRM and stop government from spying and stuff.

    Hey come on, it might happen.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  8. Is Brin serious? by cOldhandle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'I'm very disappointed for them in particular. I would hope that larger companies would not put profit ahead of all else. Generally, companies should pay attention to how and where their products are used.'

    I find this absolutely hilarious coming from Brin, pretending Google is some sort of moral authority now that they've pulled out of China due to the recent incident, having sold out to the Chinese government for many years previously providing services customized according to the state to oppress its citizens and restrict their access to news and information!

    1. Re:Is Brin serious? by khchung · · Score: 3, Informative

      I find this absolutely hilarious coming from Brin, pretending Google is some sort of moral authority now that they've pulled out of China due to the recent incident, having sold out to the Chinese government for many years previously providing services customized according to the state to oppress its citizens and restrict their access to news and information!

      No need to take him seriously, he is just doing what any manager would do -- capitalize the most PR value out of his company's actions and taking credit for it.

      Just look at any company that has done anything that got into the news, their managers will come out and saying anything to generate goodwill for that action, and also gain themselves credit in one swoop.

      --
      Oliver.
  9. Re:Getting a halo can go to your head by tcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a pretty rigid way of looking at it.
     
    Various sources have reported that they were never comfortable operating in China. One faction argued that they would do more good by being there than boycotting China. That argument prevailed for a while, but events overtook, and another faction got their way - hence the pullout. It isn't an Apple-style autocracy.
     

    --


    Information wants to be beer.
  10. Re:Monopolism over anthropology by asdf7890 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bill Gates wants to be seen as some kind of third world savior but in the end, he's just another capitalist with money to burn.

    You are aware that Bill has retired from all but a non-exec position aren't you? He has surprisingly little say in what MS do these days.

  11. actually, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So if I type "child porn" into the Google image search, should it return 8-year-olds giving blowjobs?

    Yes, it should. And people who abuse children to produce those images should be prosecuted, and the sites that host them should be prosecuted.
    Making Google censor that kind of thing doesn't make it go away, it just makes it invisible to most people. Anyone who's really interested can find it.

    And child porn is a bad analogy. The crime here isn't abuse of individuals, it's engaging in speech that criticizes government. Maybe it's a patronizing, western take on things, but if your society needs to suppress dissent to continue to exist, your society is shitty and needs to change.

  12. Valid point, why modded down ? by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the parent makes a valid point. some majority/minority somewhere in the world all wanting the same thing does NOT make what they want acceptable, humane or ethical, and doesnt free us from our moral obligations as humans to act for the greater good.

  13. Vote with your dollars by PNutts · · Score: 3, Informative

    The majority of posts here (and the article) accuse Microsoft of putting "profit over all else". However, when you do so you should also participate or risk becoming a Limousine Liberal http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limousine_liberal. The easiest thing to do is stop buying items "Made in China". The harder part is to research each product you buy to determine how much Chinese labor /goods / profits are in that item. Some tech items are straightforward (Lenovo laptops and Cisco providing equipment to the Great Firewall), but according to CNN it isn't easy for consumers http://www.cnn.com/2007/LIVING/wayoflife/07/26/china.products/index.html (50% of apple juice for example).

    When you take a stand against Microsoft for their business practices in regard to Chinese rights then you should apply that standard across the board and avoid the businesses and products that conflict with your beliefs. /soapbox