Slashdot Mirror


Facebook's Plan To Automatically Share Your Data

Giosuele sends in this excerpt from TechCrunch: "In anticipation of a slew of new features that will be launching at f8, today Facebook announced that it was once again making changes to its privacy policy. One of the biggest changes that Facebook is making involves applications and third-party websites. We've been hearing whispers from multiple sources about these changes, and the announcement all but confirms what Facebook is planning to do. In short, it sounds like Facebook is going to be automatically opting users into a reduced form of Facebook Connect on certain third party sites — a bold change that may well unnerve users, at least at first."

42 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Nooooo! by Island+Admin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Letting all the users of slashdot access my friends ... I see trouble in future :P

    1. Re:Nooooo! by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's ok, you don't have any friends.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    2. Re:Nooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you realize in your attempt to go on a racist troll, you pretty much described the plot of Crocodile Dundee?

      As for Facebook, all this means is that I have to double check that all the info I've given them is erroneous.

    3. Re:Nooooo! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's ok, you don't have any friends.

      I deleted all of my friends. At least from my Facebook account.
      Then I made all information on FB visible to friends only, and nothing accessible to applications, advertisers, etc. Then I deleted all photos, personal data, posts, and so forth. It takes a while, as Facebook has settings links for different things in several places. The account remains active, but is utterly devoid of content (even my birth date has "typographical errors"). That must make me a Facebook zombie, of sorts.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    4. Re:Nooooo! by sopssa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As for Facebook, all this means is that I have to double check that all the info I've given them is erroneous.

      Including name? Having a fake name makes it really awkward to use Facebook with your friends and relatives and so on.

      But this is finally a thing that really made me thinking of just closing my Facebook account. Not just opt-out from the new features again and again, since they just seem to always be more and more privacy intrusive.

      This doesn't use any kind of login button but shares the data automatically to a website when you visit it, so they instantly know who you are along with other data. IP data is still anonymous enough (from the view point of website operator - they don't know who you are without going through police with a valid reason), but now the third party website owners have your name and other details without you never giving them those.

      And just wait until every website will start to require you to use this. A good path for throwing all the anonymous cowards off the net and to get everyone comment and visit websites under their real name.

    5. Re:Nooooo! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Having a fake name makes it really awkward to use Facebook with your friends and relatives and so on.

      Really less than you'd think.

      I started going by "PopeRatzo" after being nominated for an Oscar in the Best Supporting Actor Category in Twelve Monkeys back in '96 and told all my friends that I'd be going by that handle. This way, they realize it's me whenever I post on Facebook and I don't get bothered by fans or butter-face Jennifer Aniston.

      Now you'll have to excuse me. Ange is coming out of the tub and wants me to give her a hot oil massage. But first I'll have to lock all those screaming effing back in their cages.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Nooooo! by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what's the purpose of the account?

  2. facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet. You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites. Each and every one of these social networking websites exists for one purpose and that's to sell your information, your demographics to advertisers and generate revenue.

    None of these sites are altruistic establishments who seek to serve the public good guarding one's privacy. At the end of the day you're engaging in opt-in Big Brother and it's far more disturbing than the advanced police state that exists in the UK and is growing in the United States of America.

    Doesn't matter if you're using a throwaway freemail account because even then it's ridiculously easy to find one's real-life information. Just stop going there, delete your information and send their company a strongly-worded letter demanding they remove your information.

    1. Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut by sopssa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, in this case the sharing of information to third party websites will be done automatically and you are automatically opted-in to the feature. I don't cry about privacy when I can decide when, what and how I give it out. When it happens automatically like here, then I'm sure as hell will complain about it.

    2. Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut by DigitAl56K · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly!

      Quoting the draft from TC's report:

      In order to provide you with useful social experiences off of Facebook, we occasionally need to provide General Information about you to pre-approved third party websites and applications that use Platform at the time you visit them (if you are still logged in to Facebook). Similarly, when one of your friends visits a pre-approved website or application, it will receive General Information about you so you and your friend can be connected on that website as well (if you also have an account with that website).

      Wait, Facebook, you don't "occasionally need to provide" anything. I did not ask or want you to provide "useful social experiences off of Facebook".

      P.S. THIS STINKS OF BEACON

    3. Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut by jonpublic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What if I switched to using a browser only for facebook?

      Probably won't matter because they'll find a new way to share my info.

  3. I see; tit for tat... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you reserve the right to burden Facebook with the truth about yourself and your most sensitive information, then they reserve the right to relieve themselves of that burden by revealing it to whomever they see fit.

    The e-reward for e-trust.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    1. Re:I see; tit for tat... by quickgold192 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doubtful. The majority of the Facebook user base cares little about actual privacy, and instead just wants a way to show as many people as possible how sick the party was last night and how stoked they are about Friday, but get this - Wednesday is the new Thursday; how awesome are they for thinking that one up?

      Their version of protest is creating a Facebook group titled "OMG stop our Facebook overlords!!! 100,000 members and we can change teh world!!!"

  4. New law of physics? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 4, Funny

    One thing faster than the speed of light is the frequency with which Facebook changes its privacy policy to suck in the unwary. (Units deliberately left undefined.)

  5. I can see it now... by mace9984 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sexy Girl: FB Update - Just got out of the shower... LOCATION: 123 Main St. Creepy Man: FB Update - Just zipped up pants. 123 Main St. Broadview Security: Targeted Ad - Hey! Sexy Girl, Now is the time to think about home security!

    1. Re:I can see it now... by Dragoniz3r · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just went to that address and there was definitely no sexy girl zipping up her pants. Just some old fat balding guy. I want my money back.

  6. Tracking and XSS for the masses by xarragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And this comes as a surprise to anyone? The real danger is the proliferation of these services into everyday life. We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker's Facebook accounts in real life. How long before you are viewed as being 'suspicious' for not having an account and sharing all your intimate details with the rest of the world? Everyone is doing it, why not you? Do you have anything to hide? I am also sure that Facebook themselves will in no way use the third-party data in order to track their users visits on other sites, would they?

    1. Re:Tracking and XSS for the masses by Chuq · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker's Facebook accounts in real life.

      We do? Is that legal? Easy answer: "I don't have a facebook account". It's none of their damn business.

      --
      - Chuq
    2. Re:Tracking and XSS for the masses by xarragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, there was a case a while back where the interviewer requested to become a friend to the potential employer. I can't find the link unfortunately, but it was a female recruit that was overwhelmed by the question and answered "yes"..

    3. Re:Tracking and XSS for the masses by Buelldozer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yup, we do.

      Here's one from last year.

      http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10268282-38.html

  7. But by davidjgraph · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are third party sites any more capable of doing anything complex with this information than Facebook? The extent to which I noticed facebook profiled me is the ads on the side would say "free gifts if you're male, 67 years old and live in Sausageville". Let's face it (no pun intended), Facebook probably gives prospective advertisers and third-party sites looking to use profile information some complex sounding presentation about the way that break down demographics to the point that an individual can be uniquely identified 24 seconds before they even think about logging into Facebook. But really, 99% of ads are based on sex, age and where they live, I'm sure a lot more companies than Facebook know this information, I think we're somewhat over-estimating technology companies' ability to mine data. OK, once I told a FB friend to not be such a baby and they got some ads about gifts for new parents. Maybe we should have a social experiment where we try to affect the ads by what we post. "Man, I wish I could get a cheap rate mobile, easy date in my area , cartoonize myself" should be a good starting point...

    ---
    This user was referred to this thread via their Farmville syndication feed. Farmville automatically linked their fruit and vegetable interests to breaking world news and current affairs. Their response on Slashdot.org has been logged and helps us build up an in-depth profile of the deepest workings of their mind, thanks!

  8. Adult sites by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hopefully they won't partner with adult sites...

    Richard is watching Porn Movie of the Day on SexSexSex.com, the dirty dirty bastard.

  9. Think of Facebook as your press release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Twitter/Facebook are flooded with advertisers so if you can't beat em join em. Use it as a press release page only.

  10. What real life information really? by Macka · · Score: 5, Funny

    They know my full name and the name of my wife; my birthday and home town and a google email address. That's it. What's the big deal about that? It's not like they have access to any of my bank details, credit cards, NI number, passport number, or anything that would really cause me grief if it got into the wrong hands.

    Stop making a mountain out of a mole hill. Sheesh !

    1. Re:What real life information really? by mellon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're kidding, right? Those are the details that an identity thief needs to impersonate you. Social engineering is a well-understood art, and the people you do it to are still living in the 20th century and don't realize that everybody's birthdays and relationships are effectively public knowledge, so if you can give them that information about a person you want to impersonate, they will believe that you are that person and then give you the information you need to get the other details.

      Some institutions are starting to wise up to this, but it's hard to know which institutions you do business with are wise to this, and most people don't check, even if they are among the very small percentage of people who realize they should. Do you know what your bank's information protection policy is, what an employee has to do to get fired for violating it, and whether or not that policy is actually enforced?

    2. Re:What real life information really? by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll go one better. Even without knowing my account number, for one dollar I will tell you my balance.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  11. i used to complain by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    about the cranky losers who constantly trumpet the fact they don't have a television, whenever the subject comes up

    however, i am now that cranky loser, for facebook: every time facebook comes up as an issue, i will trumpet the fact i don't have an account, and never will, and feel smugly superior for that fact

    it's nothing but a bonfire of vanities. you're just not that interesting, none of us are, sorry

    free your time and free yourself from endless navel gazing and obviously, get some privacy: lose facerbook, permanently. declare your freedom from shallowness and corporate exploitation

    if you have real friends, they won't need this stupid contrivance to maintain their friendship with you. the rest are just acquaintances, not really friends, and you work far too hard to maintain some ridiculous fake mask for their sake. they don't really matter to the quality of your life, unless you're shallow, in which case you don't have that much quality of life to begin with

    lose facebook. you're life will improve

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i used to complain by quickgold192 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I honestly do not like Facebook, although I have an account that I'll use about once a month. The problem with not having a Facebook account is the same problem with not eating out: Eating out every meal is expensive and, if you're a decent cook, you usually find the food pretty awful. However, if you work in an environment where everyone eats out every meal, you're pretty much forced to eat out as well unless you want to alienate yourself. Get new friends? In a job where you move every 6 months and your coworkers all just graduated college with you, you're pretty much stuck with what fate gave you.

    2. Re:i used to complain by tommut · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the rest of us are patiently waiting for The Onion to write up an Area Man Constantly Mentioning He's Not on Facebook article that we can link to....

  12. Subtle satire is subtle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whoosh.

  13. Oblig Colbert by bacon+volcano · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I value my privacy. I've been very consistent about that. I've said it on my TV show, my Twitter feed, my Facebook page, my live web Colonoscopy cam."

    - Stephen Colbert

    http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/267560/march-17-2010/united-states-census-2010

  14. Re:UK Data protection rules by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The UK and EU data protection laws do not apply to US companies. A few UK companies use this to work around them by requiring you to give explicit permission for them to share your data with a single US company, which is then free to share your data with everyone.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  15. Re:Quit WHINING. by pentalive · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why is it every time Facebook gets a new idea, everyone must scramble to update their settings - why not just assume people want to keep their information private? They could even have a single new setting that acts as a default:

    When Facebook adds a new feature that shares my information in a new way:

    (a) Share my information automatically, I can stop sharing later

    (b) Do not automatically share, I can begin sharing later.

    That way those who care can keep their data private or at least not be surprised by the new way their data is being shared, and those who find that they enjoy sharing their data in new ways can always be on the cutting edge.

    Once you set your default, you can go back at your leisure and change the setting to share or to not share. Usually you will not have to do anything because the default sets the sharing the way you like it.

    Ob Disclaimer: I don't use Facebook or any of those other new-fangled things.

  16. You opted in when you gave them your data. by Orgasmatron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Their policy means nothing, since they can always change it on a whim. The only way to have control over your information and privacy is to control it yourself.

    Anyone feel like making a distributed peer to peer facebook clone where each user runs (or at least has the ability to run) their own server?

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
  17. Re:Quit WHINING. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is it every time Facebook gets a new idea, everyone must scramble to update their settings - why not just assume people want to keep their information private?

    Because the basic purpose of facebook is to share information. An assumption that you desire privacy is counter to the idea of using facebook.

    Also its far more profitable to sell your information upfront before giving you the "opt out" choice than to only sell the information of the few people who choose to "opt in".

  18. reductio ad absurdum by sweatyboatman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know exactly what you mean! I feel the same way about the telephone!

    Sure you can use it to keep up with friends and family who live far away, but that's what letters are for. If you have real friends, they wont need this contrivance to maintain their friendship with you. And think about all the things you'll be able to talk about as if they were new if they come to visit. Ah the joys of limited connectivity!

    And I mean, talk about annoying! I know that as soon as I install one in my house, it's gonna start ringing, interrupting work, interrupting dinner, interrupting sleep. And nine times out of ten it's going to be someone I don't know trying to sell me something I don't need. And what do you want to bet that the phone company isn't listening in?

    That's why I say,

    lose the telephone, you're (sic) life will improve

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    1. Re:reductio ad absurdum by SpekkioMofW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank you - you said it better than I could have.

      --
      Spekkio Master of War
  19. Re:Quit WHINING. by YourExperiment · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it every time Facebook gets a new idea, everyone must scramble to update their settings

    Because it's far easier for the site to make money that way, and they really don't care about your privacy (although it is wise for them to maintain the facade of caring).

  20. Re:Quit WHINING. by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because most people are too stupid and / or lazy to be bothered to mess with the privacy controls. Facebook knows this, and exploits it (like many other sites) to build their pool of demographic / advertising data. That's why the controls are generally buried several menus deep and hard to find. It's no different than being subscribed to an online vendor's email newsletter by default unless you *uncheck* that box during checkout. Every time Facebook adds a new feature, it gives them another chance to add to the pool and increase their ad revenue. And you can't blame them really, being that the service is free for its users and selling ads is their primary revenue source.

  21. Re:Only a fool would publish personal info by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What fucking pisses me off is I do that and yet I have one _ex_ friend who is dumb enough to go posting all over Facebook wherever that stuff comes up with "corrections". Fucking idiot. No matter how often I told her there was a reason I'd put incorrect information in there she kept doing it. Deleted that moron from the friends list and also from the phonebook, and my life.

    You may think you're doing a good job of being private, but I bet everybody on here has at least one friend who has loaded up their Google address book with all of the private details you were hoping to keep from Google. It's annoying enough that these people consistently email out with a hundred names and addresses in the To: field, so people who I'd successfully avoided giving my details to suddenly have them.

    You can't win. People are dumb fuckers who care only about shiny things and making their own lives "better". Putting everything online with no regard for privacy or security somehow makes their lives "better", particularly if it's a nice shiny website.

    --
    I drink to make other people interesting!
  22. Re:info by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's interesting.

    Your address is in CA and your phone number is from Tennessee?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_code_901

    Yahoo maps says there is no Maple Ave in San Diego.

    So you are demonstrating the point of how easy it is to frame someone?

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  23. Re:Quit WHINING. by thejynxed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Correction. Selling their user's data to anyone who's willing to pay (spammers anyone?) is their primary revenue source. Any advertisement slots they sell on the site itself is just a secondary revenue stream, and considering the amount of people using ad-blocking of some sort, negligible.

    --
    @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.