Slashdot Mirror


Man Sues Neighbor Claiming Wi-Fi Made Him Sick

OrangeMonkey11 writes "A Santa Fe man who claims to suffer from 'electromagnetic sensitivities' has sued his neighbor after she refused to stop using wireless devices. 59-year-old Arthur Firstenberg claims his sensitivity can be set off by cellphones, routers and other electronic devices. From the article: 'Firstenberg, 59, wanted Raphaela Monribot to limit her use of the devices. "I asked her to work with me," he said. "Basically, she refused." So he sued Monribot in state district court, seeking $530,000 in damages and an injunction to force her to turn off the electronics. "Being the target of this lawsuit has affected me very adversely," Monribot said Friday in response to e-mailed questions. "I feel as if my life and liberty are under attack for no valid reason, and it has forced me to have to defend my very basic human rights."'"

60 of 574 comments (clear)

  1. the more attention you give morons... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the more they'll act like morons.

    I wish reporters wouldn't give this type of crap the time of day.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:the more attention you give morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> I wish reporters wouldn't give this type of crap the time of day.

      Yep - let's ignore this story and focus on the previous story, which is... let's see... A NEW APPLE PRODUCT RUMORS!!

    2. Re:the more attention you give morons... by eparker05 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "the more attention you give morons, the more they'll act like morons."

      I disagree with your sentiment. If you publicly embarrass somebody for acting stupidly. They often think twice before acting stupidly again. What we need is more bad press for these types of people, like that town in Africa where everybody claimed to be getting sick from radio waves until they were told that the tower had been turned off two weeks prior. Also there is the guy who became violently ill only when cell phones rang (but not when they communicated with the cell tower silently). Yea. Lots of stupid people more need attention.

      Scientology too... but that is another thread.

    3. Re:the more attention you give morons... by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We had something similar happening here, where people started complaining about the electromagnetic field from a cell repeater tower.

      PR statement from the telco: "Gee, wonder what it'll be like when we turn it on in a few weeks..."

      Needless to say that the court tossed the suit without a hearing.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:the more attention you give morons... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Informative

      eparker05 is correct, it was Africa.

      Which is not to say that similar events have not happened in many places.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    5. Re:the more attention you give morons... by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These people don't get embarrassed.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
    6. Re:the more attention you give morons... by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just give the idiot plaintiff a double blind test, and we can move on with our lives.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    7. Re:the more attention you give morons... by osgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree with your sentiment. If you publicly embarrass somebody for acting stupidly. They often think twice before acting stupidly again.

      Well, you've got two problems with this disagreement.

      1. People rationalize pretty much any behavior they intentionally exhibit. The most hardened of criminals in lock-up feel that they don't deserve it. What they did wasn't that wrong, or society made them do it, or they were justified because of some wrong they perceived against themselves. It's no different with this guy. What he's doing is right no matter what the judge says, what his neighbors say, what the general public says. It wouldn't be very surprising if it were shown that he deceptively uses a laptop or visual observations to know that his neighbor is using wifi or her cell phone. I'm sure he'd view these things as justified because of "what she's doing".

      If I'm wrong, he should go for the Randi prize. I bet they'd agree to test him if he claimed to be sensitive to the types of EMR described in the story.

      2. Many people do feed off of the negative attention. Just look at the enormous amount of effort that Slashdot editors and the moderation system go to in order to fend off the trolls. Trolls are the people that get a warm fuzzy feeling when they see someone frowning or imagine that they're frowning.

    8. Re:the more attention you give morons... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh, almost forgot: Of course the complaint was repeated a few weeks later when they turned it on.

      The judge issued a fine for wasting the court's time a second time. Don't remember the exact wording, but the general meaning was something like "don't play smart, we already know that you fake it".

      Reading verdicts can be quite entertaining at times. Especially when judges display a sense of humor.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:the more attention you give morons... by Bakkster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't categorically say all of them are morons. Assuming they aren't intentionally claiming to be sick to get their way, they might actually be sick. Sure, it might be a psychosomatic illness rather than physiological one, but either way the person is ill and needs treatment.

      Also, by better separating the morons from the real cases, we can hopefully eventually perform actual research to separate any physiological cases from psychosomatic ones. Then we can hopefully cure both and put an end to cases like this.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    10. Re:the more attention you give morons... by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but, which eye do you poke out first?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    11. Re:the more attention you give morons... by Cyberax · · Score: 3, Informative

      This story is typical.

      We had the same exact situation here (Kiev, Ukraine). As far as I know, it's now a standard operating procedure for telecoms here to wait 1-2 months before turning on a base station after it is installed, so such complaints can be tossed out immediately.

    12. Re:the more attention you give morons... by Otto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being able to sense electromagnetic fields, using no devices or other assistance, in a double blind trial, would definitely be worthy of the $1,000,000 from JREF.

      http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html

      Anybody who claims to be sensitive to this sort of thing and who has not won the million bucks is basically a flat-out liar.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    13. Re:the more attention you give morons... by IICV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That only works if the reporting is embarrassing. What tends to happen in the United States is that the reporters try to pretend that they are unbiased, and as such give equal weight to both the retarded side and the rational side - after all if there are two sides to an argument, then obviously there's a 50/50 chance that either side is true, right?

      Thus, some moron like this guy and his woo-filled doctor* get put up against Dr. Bob Park, a physicist at the University of Maryland. That's not embarrassing at all; it puts these two idiots on an equal level with someone who's spent his entire career studying the subject. It's fucking flattering.

      *Just because you have an MD doesn't mean you're qualified to determine whether "electrosensitivity" is a condition, no matter what the gullible reporter thinks. Do you think that a lady who pushes the always-vague "toxins" theory of chronic disease knows anything about electromagnetism beyond what she learned in Freshman physics?

    14. Re:the more attention you give morons... by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And what about the poor person who is actually suffering because of this idiot? You don't think the plight of this person should be made known to the world?

      My wife was sued last year for a completely stupid reason, and one of the worst parts of the experience for me was knowing that we were getting screwed and nobody in the world gave a crap about it.

    15. Re:the more attention you give morons... by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just kidding, I'm sure no one would be stupid enough to claim that a certain frequency of light caused them physical problems, unless of course it really did...

      Great. Just when I was about to paint my house ultraviolet you came along and ruined it. Thanks.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    16. Re:the more attention you give morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had a neighbor worried that my HAM antenna was going to potentially give her cancer, and headaches. I simply explained that my antenna was designed not to give off radiation but to collect it from the front and then refract it backwards. She was happy with that and her headaches from the radiation that she was getting have gone away since my antenna is collecting so much of it!

    17. Re:the more attention you give morons... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anybody who claims to be sensitive to this sort of thing and who has not won the million bucks is basically a flat-out liar.

      Funny story. Once on /. someone was trying to claim that James Randi was rejecting legitimate claims of Super Powers. They of course failed miserably, but in the course of trying they linked to a randi.org forum post that simply made my day. It was the most awesome post I'd ever seen, at least on this topic.

      It was a post by a man who had previously submitted an application to be tested (I think it was for EM sensitivity, but it might have been dousing or something), but -- and here's the awesome part -- he was retracting his application because he'd decided to actually conduct experiments with at least a single-blind format, and concluded based on his experiment that he didn't really have super powers.

      Holy fuck. Every so often something happens that gives me a little hope for the human species.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    18. Re:the more attention you give morons... by Sanat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn Tom, They moved Santa Fe from New Mexico to California?

      Cool... that probably raised the IQ in both places.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    19. Re:the more attention you give morons... by djsmiley · · Score: 4, Funny

      Erm....

      If their eyes are "lighting up" then I think they have a perfectly valid reason to sue ;)

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
    20. Re:the more attention you give morons... by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do you have a source for that?

      Not quite identical to the parent's story, but this is a reasonably close match: http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Wireless/11099.html

    21. Re:the more attention you give morons... by Otto · · Score: 4, Informative

      A friend of mine could detect radar. At one point he was working on a radar unit when it was activated and he survived. After that point he claimed to be sensitive to it. The funny thing was that when driving with him he was an awesome radar detector. It was uncanny how he would say there's a cop with a radar ahead on roads he'd never been on and he'd always be right. I'm still somewhat skeptical myself though.

      Define "always be right". Is that actually true, or do you simply not remember when he was wrong?

      Tossing out of negative or non-noteworthy results is one of the most common forms of selection bias. Basically, only the notable events (where he was right) get remembered, while the mundane stuff (where he was wrong) gets ignored or forgotten.

      For example, this sort of bias is why many people are fooled by psychics. They only remember the hits, not the misses. And what can be a "hit" is very wide indeed.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    22. Re:the more attention you give morons... by prockcore · · Score: 3, Informative

      Context for the Africa comment:

      http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Wireless/11099.html

      A community sues iBurst because they claim their tower was making them sick. iBurst reveals that the tower wasn't even on.

    23. Re:the more attention you give morons... by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

      The last story that they ran on here regarding EM allergies was in Africa.

          I went looking around for history on this. The oldest I could find online was a 2003 case where a school in Chicago refused to use wifi because it could potentially harm students.

          this story references Canada and the UK.

          Oddly enough, I found this story from Santa Fe (the same city as this case in this story), where Arthur Firstenberg, the leader of a group of wifi sensitives, sued the city to not allow wifi to be installed throughout the city. He lost.

          Coincidentally, this came up again in January 2010 in this story, where Mr. Firstenberg sued his neighbor for using wifi.

          And coincidentally, he's the same guy in today's article.

          So, if you follow the trail back, you'll find that he's been making noise about this for a long time.

          In this 2007 article is mentioned for forming the Cellular Phone Task Force

          He is in the citations with:
      Electromagnetic Fields, (EMF) Killing Fields," Arthur Firstenberg, The Ecologist, v. 34, n. 5, 6-10-2004.

      "Radio Wave Packet," Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force, Sept 2001

          In 1997, his group published this mortality report. Obviously cell phones kill people. Everyone repeat after me "Correlation does not imply causation".

          But hey, who am I to call a guy an attention seeking lunatic. Just because it's been spouting crap for over a decade *AND* getting published for it (drama queens love their attention), doesn't mean that he's all wrong. Talk to the guy yourself. On his site, http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/, he asks you to contact him. e-mail: info@cellphonetaskforce.org phone: (505) 471-0129 .

          Yes, those were copy & pasted directly from his site. If he didn't want to call, he wouldn't have put the details up there.

      Google phonebook reverses the number to his name.

          When you call, remind him that there's electromagnetic fields around everything electrical. That includes the wires running inside the walls of his house. Yes Mr. Firstenberg, you're allergic to your own house. Run, run for the Faraday cage in the mountains. It's the only place you'll be safe. Well, kinda safe. You gotta watch out for the government using their ELF radios. I saw a X-Files once, where a guys head exploded because of ELF experiments. If it was on TV, it must be true.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  2. Ugh by jav1231 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If this makes it into the courtroom the judge is the idiot.

    1. Re:Ugh by arthurpaliden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if the SCO lawsuits can make it to court anything can.

    2. Re:Ugh by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Informative

      Only the judge can rule the case frivolous. Thus it has to "make it to the courtroom" though there need not be any trial. The preliminary injunction has already been denied. Hopefully the motion for dismissal will be granted and the defendant will be awarded costs and fees. That is the proper way to handle frivolous suits.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  3. Picture in the summary has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's the guy's problem, not his neighbour's. If he's got a sensitivity to it, he should don a tinfoil hat and live inside a Faraday cage.

    I developed lactose intolerance late in my life. Should I sue the makers of all my favourite foods because they can't accomodate me?

    1. Re:Picture in the summary has it right by IBBoard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you in America and seeking large sums of money for no real cause?

    2. Re:Picture in the summary has it right by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are the dairies pouring the milk into your house and forcing you to drink it?

      Not that I think this case has any merit, but your analogy doesn't match up – if this guys claims were actually true, then his neighbour would be actively doing something that was harming him, not just passively sitting there holding something that could harm him if it were used against him.

    3. Re:Picture in the summary has it right by mea37 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm impressed. There are so many solid arguments against those who claim sensitivity to consumer electronics, I didn't think anyone could possibly come forward asserting such a poor one as yours.

      If you tried to apply your "lactose intolerant" analogy, don't you suppose your opponent would point out that the makers of your favorite foods don't project those foods into your home against your wishes?

      If these sensitivities were real (though I very much doubt that they are), he would have a point. Just because something has become socially common doesn't mean it's ok to do if it later turns out that it harms others in their own home. The key phrase is if they were real; so this point is moot unless someone can show some credible scientific basis for anything beyond the psychosomatic.

      I don't know if this guy really believes he's sensitive or if he's just a complete asshat. It sure looks like he figured he saw a way to make a quick buck by convincing someone he knew uses electronics to move in to the next house over.

    4. Re:Picture in the summary has it right by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A more apt analogy would be somebody who develops extreme sun sensitivity late in life, and then attempts to sue the sun.

      And as much as I'd like to believe this is a really, really stupid example, I somehow can not completely discount the possibility of this happening someday, somewhere.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    5. Re:Picture in the summary has it right by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 4, Funny

      Assuming high noon on the equator, it's a regular window mounted vertically in the wall. The trick is you need a pool mounted at 45 degrees.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  4. Lucky for him by Grashnak · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's lucky he doesn't live in a universe where "electromagnetism" is everywhere, all the time. Oh, wait...

    --
    Life needs more saving throws.
  5. The waves are everywhere! by COMON$ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok people, do you have any CLUE how many radio waves are going through your body at any given time? I mean seriously do people think that GPS's, Cell Phones, Watches, all have some kind of invisible tether? Your best hope is to find a cave in the mountains. Not a home in suburbia...

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    1. Re:The waves are everywhere! by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Funny

      >>>Ok people, do you have any CLUE how many radio waves are going through your body at any given time?

      I'm being irradiated right now.
      By my CRT.
      Tuned to playboy.

      It tingles.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:The waves are everywhere! by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

      No they don't. Most people are horribly undereducated about the world around them. I blame High Fructose Corn syrup consumption.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Homeowner? His responsibility by Evardsson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If he is a homeowner, how he protects himself from his surrounding environment is his responsibility. If he really believes he is being made sick by electro-magnetic energies around him maybe he needs to wrap his house in a Faraday cage and shut the hell up.

    You can't sue your neighbor when their cherry tree blooms and sets off your allergies. Same thing.

    --
    Death looks every man in the face. All any man can do is look back and smile. - Marcus Aurelius
    1. Re:Homeowner? His responsibility by slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For that to work, he'd have to believe that Faraday cages work.
      Since he clearly has no truck with science, why would he believe that?

  7. Re:In this litigious society... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blasphemy! I'm going to sue you for that statement, you insensitive clod!

  8. So presumably a lawyer took this case by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the irritating thing about it. You can harass people with frivolous lawsuits, and, while the judge may throw them out, the lawyers still get paid. Provided the guy's lawyer asks for his fee up front, what is his disincentive to file lawsuits like this one? I really wish lawyers could receive some sort of punishment or censure for wasting the court's time and enabling harassment.

  9. Mercy by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suspect that the plaintiff is suffering from some significant mental health issues. Maybe paranoia or hypochondria or something. My guess is that this guy isn't suing because he's a jerk, but because he thinks the issue is real.

    Hopefully the suit will be dismissed with a minimum of fuss and expense, and the guy can get the help he probably needs.

    1. Re:Mercy by LingNoi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the guy is simply a jerk. He knew before she even moved in that she uses these devices. He's trying to cash in and from reading the article this women is too afraid to even leave her house because of this dick and his friend.

      From the article..

      I have always made myself available to them at all hours," she said. "We communicate often through Skype, Gmail chat, video and audio sessions."

      Firstenberg knew this when he mentioned to her that the Casados Street house was for rent, but after Monribot moved in, he and a friend insisted that she turn off her Wi-Fi router and other equipment. She tried to comply, but felt harassed.

    2. Re:Mercy by Myopic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Be careful when saying things like "mental illness is as real as any physical illness". In order to equate mental illness with physical illness, you must equate imagination with reality. If I imagine my arm is broken, that doesn't make it physically broken. If I imagine I have a brain tumor, that doesn't mean I have a brain tumor.

      But, if I imagine I feel pain, then that might be equal to "actually" feeling pain, since pain is an imaginary symptom (occurring literally only in your head).

      So, it's true in some ways, and untrue in other ways. Just make sure to be clear on what you mean.

  10. Re:In this litigious society... by Moryath · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm going to sue you for insulting all of us insensitive clods, you insensitive clod!

  11. She should have turned-off the devices by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...without telling the Moron, and then let the moron keep insisting "your wireless makes me sick". It would be funny. Especially in court.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:She should have turned-off the devices by wjousts · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or even better. Ask him how he knows the wireless devices are on?

    2. Re:She should have turned-off the devices by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He probably saw her using her iPhone and it made him feel sick.

      I have the same problem... but only when I see them texting while driving at 90.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  12. Re:At least... by LingNoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even if it makes it to court the guy won't. I'll be there with a grid of routers, cell phones and all type of other EM emitting radiation devices.

  13. I think I have a solution by Takionbrst · · Score: 5, Funny

    Follow me here: The average household is somewhere around 2400 square feet. Let's assume for simplicity sake that it's a box measuring 49'x49'x10'. That makes for about 6800 square feet of interior surface area. The skin depth for gold at 2.4 GHz is pretty close to 200nm, but to be sure that the vast majority of the signal is stopped lets assume a coating of 1um thickness. 6800 square feet multiplied by 1um yields a volume of about 6e-4 m^3 of gold. Multiplying this by the density of gold (~20gm/cm^3) yields about 12 kilograms of gold. The last time I checked, gold was something close to $1200 dollars an ounce, which works out to be about $508k. So all the guy really wants to do is use the settlement money to WiFi proof his house. And have a gold plated interior. And a little bit left over for hookers and blow.

  14. How to tell if he's a liar by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) Mount a satellite dish on the wall of a long room.
    2) Place a chair at the opposite end of the room.
    3) Have this guy sit in the chair for an hour.
    4) See how much he complains about headaches, how much he acts up, how he has been brain-poisoned etc.
    5) Show him that the dish is not connected to anything, and never has been.

    If he doesn't react, affix it to a signal generator and see how he performs in an actual scientifically conducted test. But do it my way first, then make it into an amusing video montage so everyone knows how much of a tool he is.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  15. Re:Basic Human Rights? by Ephemeriis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the summary:

    "I feel as if my life and liberty are under attack for no valid reason, and it has forced me to have to defend my very basic human rights."'"

    Ok, so the guy filing the suit is a moron and the suit has no technical merit at all. But really? Running a router is now a basic human right? A little melodramatic don't you think?

    Well, some places are declaring Internet access a human right...

    But I don't think that's really the point.

    Generally speaking, you're allowed to do what you want within the confines of your own house. Of course you still can't murder people and whatnot... But it's a little unusual for your neighbors to be able to dictate what kind of telephone you use, and whether your Internet connection is wired or wireless, or whether you can own or use a cell phone. Those are all liberties that we pretty much take for granted.

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  16. Re:Human interest filler story by Cryophallion · · Score: 3, Informative

    PopSci just had a major article on it: http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-02/disconnected

  17. Re:use UTP then by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sorry... UTP is not the answer. The answer is to tell this guy to go fuck himself. I'm not responsible for changing my behavior because some other nutbar has a psychosomatic illness. That's for him and his doctors to deal with. Not me and his lawyers.

  18. Re:In this litigious society... by Mitchell314 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And what's with this discrimination against sensitive clods? I'll be seeing you all in court.

    --
    I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
  19. Re:Um... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

    My dad actually presided an arbitration over a complaint against a cell tower, the complaint was of course about the electromagnetic field and how they have a negative impact on the people. The main complainant presented his case, lamented for nearly 15 minutes (he has to be given the time, no matter what, part of the procedure, even though my dad really wanted to interrupt...), when he ended the rest of the arbitration consisted of:

    Dad: What's that in your breast pocket?
    Complainant: My cellphone.
    Dad: Complaint rejected. My advice is to get a book about basic physics, read the part about electromagnetism and how distance affects fields and their strength.

    The hard part was to get the recorder to strike that last part from the record...

    I know that case pretty well, my dad always uses it as the perfect example why you have to know more than just your field of study, him only knowing law and not physics would not have ended this case so quickly. And it's a good example how hysteria often replaces rational thinking, especially when people feel ill for some reason and grasp for straws in their quest to find a culprit.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. Re:In this litigious society... by tthomas48 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "And, I'm sorry to say, probably win."*

    *Citation needed

    Just because you're jaded doesn't mean reality matches your view.

  21. Re:it's not so funny by pz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...when you are the victim. Don't know for an Wireless AP but I go real headaches from a telco's base station. It was as close as 70 meters from my appartment and although it was 4 storeys higher than my home it still made me sick. And the most interesting part: while climbing the stairs to my appartment going through the floors when I was getting near my floor the nasty sensation was setting off. So the guy may be in his right. All he did was to buy a house and then waited till somebody started making him sick. Why don't you look from the other side - make the lady put her house in a Faraday cage if she insist on her wireless?

    Where's the control in your experiment? How do you know that it was the tower and not, say, the ultrasonic pest repellent devices that your landlord had installed on your floor? Or any of a half dozen frequently used but kind of nasty chemicals that are routinely found in apartment buildings? Or the flickering old-style fluorescent lights? Frankly, the fact that the sensation wasn't worse OUTSIDE when the building isn't shielding you from what sounds like line-of-sight irradiation makes me dubious that the source of your headaches have been properly isolated.

    Or, you're trolling, and I fell for it.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  22. Old News by Scotland+Tom · · Score: 3, Informative

    Didn't this same Firstenberg guy ALREADY DO THIS to another neighbor back in January?

    Why is anyone even paying attention to him and his absurd claims?

  23. Against something that's government sanctioned? by name_already_taken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The devices in question are already approved by the Federal government for use in residential settings.

    That more than likely trumps any claims by this nutcase*.

    It will be up to the nutcase* himself to insulate or shield the interior of his home.

    Think about it - if instead of electromagnetic sensitivity he thought he had car sensitivity - cars driving by his house made him sick. He'd want to stop people from driving on the street, but that's another government sanctioned activity that no court would let him impose restrictions on.

    *nutcase - someone with a psychological disorder that they think is caused by something external, instead of the truth which is that he's got too much time on his hands. He should really buy an old mine and live underground if he wants to avoid RF.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!