Slashdot Mirror


James Lovelock Suggests Suspending Democracy To Save the World

mosb1000 writes "Climate scientist James Lovelock claims it may be necessary to put democracy on hold to prevent a global climate catastrophe. He goes on to say that the best remedies may be adaptation techniques such as building sea defenses." Lovelock is famously the creator of the Gaia hypothesis.

7 of 865 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Lovelock or Love Democracy by MrHanky · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If democracy has become an end in itself, then it's not worth saving.

  2. Re:A better way to save the world by techno-vampire · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Would be to suspend James Lovelock. In carbonite.

    Personally, I'd rather he were suspended by the neck until dead.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  3. Re:Slow news day by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It can -- but Gaia's fix will involve the die-off of most or all of humanity.

    Not doing too well on that so far, is it?

    Enjoy your pseudo-religious "Armageddon of the heathens" fantasies though.

    --
    Azural - instrumentals
  4. Not just stupidity but also addicted by perr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Unfortunately humanity is also addicted to democracy and capitalism.

  5. I say we suspend by night_flyer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    gov't financing of scientists

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  6. Re:Um..no by jcr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Very little gets done because it might interfere with what the uneducated masses think is best for them.

    You know, it's that contempt for ordinary people that is the basis of all tyranny. Why in the world am I supposed to believe that someone like, say, YOU, is better qualified to make decisions for the people you despise, than the people themselves are? I heartily invite you to go fuck yourself.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  7. Re:Um..no by jez9999 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Same set of people who think that people aren't fit to bear arms... except when it's the people they personally prefer.

    Too right! Who are to say who should and shouldn't have tanks, apaches, and nuclear weapons?