Slashdot Mirror


Sex.com is Going Down

nathanielinbrazil writes "A motion to dismiss the involuntary bankruptcy of Sex.com has been filed in a California court. Operational turmoil has put its owner in the doghouse with its creditors, who want to take over. 'It's the best domain in the world by far,' said Mike Mann, who has tried to keep the creditors at bay. Sex.com is estimated to be worth $100m. Let the games begin!"

7 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. Um by jav1231 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always thought going down had been a big part of their strategy? :p

    1. Re:Um by h00manist · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is sex still profitable on the net? How did these guys manage to mess up? It doesn't seem to take a genius to sell sex online.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    2. Re:Um by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

      What sex? A name like "sex.com" just isn't specific enough anymore. It's just like a department store trying to compete with small, specialty stores.

      Would a serious skater buy a board at Wal-Mart?

      If you want to sell sex on the Internet, target a specific market segment, with a domain like:

      TeenLesbiansWithTripleHeadedDildoes.com, or

      GranniesScatRompWithLordOfTheRingCharacters.com, or

      CatholicSchoolTeachersAbusingSchoolKids.com . . .

      . . . although, for the last one, you can get the real thing for free by attending church . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, you suck. NONE of those links work!

  2. Not worth that much i guess by thsoundman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the domain is "so valuble" then why can't he sell it? Who the hell values these things? Granted it's a much clamored for domain but seriously... somthing is only worth as much as someone is willing to pay for it. If no one is willing to pay for the domain it's not worth 100 million.

    1. Re:Not worth that much i guess by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Beyond the growth of free stuff, and good old fashioned piracy, the value of generalist site names, even in classy TLDs, seems to have been basically destroyed by the rise of search engines that don't suck.

      Back in the bad old days, when searching was seriously limited and not very good, having a URL (or AOL keyword, god help us all) that would be immediately obvious to a desperate n00b might well have had real value.

      These days, though, you either know exactly where you are going, or you use your browser's search box as a kind of sloppy-natural-language-command-line thing and enter your hopes and wishes and questions with varying degrees of vagueness. Then, typically, the search engine does a pretty good job of figuring out what you want, and gives you some plausible options, no matter what their URLs are.

      If anything, the truly "obvious" URLs are probably worth less than some of the weird ones, now. Upholding a trademark(without having to constantly append your .TLD in advertisements) is almost certainly easier if your company name/URL is some catchy nonsense word than if it is something that would have helped a n00b 10 or 15 years ago.

  3. the best domain in the world? by Virtucon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What about google.com? microsoft.com?

    I'd point out that those sites have made substantially more money for their owners than sex.com. Just reading the stories about this domain, the theft, the international intrigue it makes me think it's the most nefarious domain on the network, but hardly the best one. It reminds me of the story of "the monkey's paw" and unfortunately that was fiction, this is reality.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"