Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Claims Google Chrome Steals Your Privacy

An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft is going on the offensive against Google, accusing the search giant of creating a browser that does not respect user privacy. The company posted a video, embedded below, on TechNet Edge with the following description: 'Watch a demo on how Google Chrome collects every keystroke you make and how Internet Explorer 8 keeps your information private through two address bars and In Private browsing.' Microsoft's first criticism is Chrome's combining the address bar and the search box into a single entry box; IE8 keeps those fields separate. 'By keeping these boxes separate, your privacy is better protected and the addresses of the sites you're visiting aren't automatically shared with Microsoft, or anyone else,' says IE product manager Pete LePage."

25 of 522 comments (clear)

  1. Correct by sopssa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pete LePage is spot on with this. The privacy intrusion by Chrome is outstanding. Every key you type to the address bar is sent to Google. Your Chrome installation has an personal UI number to track where you downloaded Chrome from, wherever you use it and how you use it.

    I am still surprised how many people (even here on our geeky slashdot group who should know better) choose something based on it being offered for free, no matter what happens to their privacy. The same people who complain about casual people using Facebook and how much information they're putting there, and not realizing how much privacy they are losing by using Google's free products and search engine.

    It's a known fact that every software needs to be funded in some way. Personally I rather choose a paid solution where I know my privacy wont be lost and I can save documents, emails, etc on my own hard drive instead of relying on cloud computing and all the marketing and privacy intrusion to make it possible. After all Google is a marketing company while Microsoft is an software company. The fact they're doing business by selling me a product instead of whoring to advertisers kind of shows that.

    1. Re:Correct by Jaysyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Personally I rather choose a paid solution where I know my privacy wont be lost and I can save documents, emails, etc on my own hard drive instead of relying on cloud computing and all the marketing and privacy intrusion to make it possible.

      You do that. I'll stick with Firefox, thanks.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hope so, they might be able to start recommending some better, hotter, stuff for my pleasuring!

    3. Re:Correct by sopssa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually you are spot on, but for other reasons.

      With Facebook you choose what information you put or post there.

      With Google you do not - they have what you have typed to address bar, what you have searched for, what your emails contain, what sites you visit, how you're there, what you do (analytics) and so on..

      Actually both Google and Microsoft are worried about this - see my subscription here for a request to change relating laws.

    4. Re:Correct by Trinn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've accidentally gone back while filling out a major form (that won't remember its state on a click of forward) enough times to want to simply remove the backspace key from my keyboard. I am happy to hear someone's getting rid of this asinine default. cmd/alt-left/right are fine. backspace has a specific meaning that has nothing to do with history navigation.

  2. Look.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if Chrome -was- violating your privacy, why switch to IE? Especially when there is Firefox... Myself I don't like using Chrome because it is not customizable the way Firefox is. You can't even change history settings on Chrome!

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  3. Bogus argument by FranTaylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "By keeping these boxes separate, your privacy is better protected"

    Umm, the boxes are all controlled by the same program, so whether or not there is physical separation between them (does that have any meaning in a user interface?) has nothing to do with whether or not the data is collected or not.

    This guy is a product manager?

  4. Re:Not Correct by parallel_prankster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did you not read TFA at all ? You can not only choose which search provider to use the search suggestions, you can also turn off search suggestions in chrome !!

  5. Let me be the first to say... by kaffiene · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Meh!

    I don't care. I know the deal with Google. Everyone knows the deal with Google - they mine your data so they can target ads, you get useful software.

    I don't mind Google's targeted ads so I feel no need for a tinfoil hat over this one.

    If Google were trying to break into my bank account, I'd be worried, but I don't fear non-obtrusive advertising.

  6. Re:Not Correct by ChinggisK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All of these settings are hidden in the advanced settings dialog

    Bullshit. The search provider option is right on the first options tab. The search suggestions option is at the very top on the last tab (there are only 3 tabs), under the big blue "Privacy" label. Don't damage your own case by exaggerating the facts.

  7. Re:Not Correct by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've read the title of the summary, and dismissed it as an especially smelly load of swine shit. Every browser has it's own issues, and the user should be familiar with them. Yeah, all the browsers tend to keep records that are unnecessary. All the browsers tend to report data that is unnecessary, to websites, to developers, to the authors, if left on default settings.

    But, for MICROSOFT to point fingers is just preposterous.

    Maybe they can try again in 10 years, after they've created a clearly superior browser. I mean, CLEARLY superior to anything else on the market. When those of us who really dislike and/or hate microsoft HAVE to admit that their browser is at least as good as any of the competition, THEN MS can find fault with the competition.

    Wait - did I say "10 years"? Hmmmmmm. More than likely, browsers will be obsolete before Microsoft makes the browser that is clearly superior to any competition that can be found.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  8. Re:Not Correct by repka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's so hard to understand about this problem? Most users want to use suggestions only for their searches, not URLs they enter. Chrome only allows toggling suggestions for both.

  9. Re:Not Correct by DJRumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To add to that, what is to stop a software vendor (MS) from simply gathering the information typed into ANY field in a browser. Whether they are in a combo field or not is irrelevant. What a ridiculous argument.

  10. Re:Not Correct by Kugrian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All of these settings are hidden in the advanced settings dialog

    They aren't hidden, they're quite visible. 3 clicks show you them.

  11. Re:Not Correct by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's useless. Most Slashdotters have their heads so far up Google's ass, nothing you say will reach their ears. This is a company that indexes everything forever, including your email and IM conversations. It gets praised as some "open source company" when its main product--its search engine and advertising platform--is as closed as Windows. It only uses open source products to get people onto its proprietary advertising platform.

  12. Re:Not Correct by repka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's not true, if they wanted to keep it anonymous, they wouldn't send session cookie with each request. Yet they do. Session id is not required for auto-suggestions.

    Once again they don't just receive everything you type in address bar, they also associate it with your session.

  13. Re:Not Correct by DJRumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean via the same mechanism where you type information into 'Bing', and then 'Bing' responds with your search results?

    Most people don't type in 100 character URL's (I don't know of any) they either have it bookmarked, or they search for it via, you guess it, the search engine like Google, Bing, or whatnot.

  14. Re:Not Correct by ChinggisK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a fine, legitimate argument. It becomes bullshit when you start suggesting that the options are "hidden in the advanced settings dialog" instead of just right there in the options menu. I'm just protesting the exaggeration.

  15. Re:Not Correct by Simon80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, Firefox's default behavior is to serve up your keystrokes to google as well, so I think the main point is that all three browsers' defaults aren't privacy friendly.

  16. Re:Obnoxious Motherfuckers by Rantastic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What this really means is that Microsoft is scared shitless. Anyone who really cares about security and privacy left Windows and Microsoft behind a long time ago.

    --
    Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
  17. Re:Not Correct by shimage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Assuming you didn't just pull that "90%" figure out of your ass, who cares? They obviously don't, and it's not my privacy they're dicking with. Besides, it's not like Google and every other search engine out there doesn't already store and analyze search queries (indexed by IP address). Is it that big a problem that Google or Bing or whatever knows what you are about to search for before you hit the enter key?

  18. Re:Not Correct by supremebob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That said, most of that 90% of users who wouldn't bother changing the default options in Chrome probably wouldn't have Chrome to begin with. Most of those users would be using whatever browser came pre-installed on the PC that they ordered from Dell or picked up at Sam's Club, and many of them probably haven't even heard of Chrome yet.

    My point is that Chrome already has a pretty advanced user base (advanced enough to know how to download and install a web browser, anyway), and they would know how to edit privacy options if they wanted to do so.

  19. Re:Not Correct by BobPaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's so hard to understand about this problem? Most users want to use suggestions only for their searches, not URLs they enter.

    Bullshit. Most users only use the search bars on Firefox and IE, anyway. And they frequently type URLs into them. If I had a nickel for every time I saw someone type "google" into the search bar, click the first result from MSN and then type a search...

    Usage studies is how Google came to their cleaner interface. Your concerns about privacy are valid, and I wouldn't doubt that factored into their design decisions, but I wouldn't be surprised if the other browsers combined their bars eventually, too. We're already moving that way with FX's awesome-bar.

  20. Re:Not Correct by Torodung · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um, Firefox's address bar searches your local bookmarks and history. The "suggestions" are from your own locally stored browsing habits, which you can burn to the ground with every exit if you like.

    --
    Toro

  21. Re:Not Correct by Benaiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And 90% of all statistics are made up on the spot!