Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Say Toads Can Predict Earthquakes

reillymj writes "Researchers claim toads sensed a severe earthquake last year five days before it hit. Last spring's L'Aquila earthquake devastated the medieval city of the same name in Italy. Five days earlier, a group of biologists noticed some toads behaving strangely in a pond nearby that would later be the quake's epicenter."

6 of 66 comments (clear)

  1. Toads Say Slashdot Editors Are Morons by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From TFA:

    I consulted with Susan Hough, a seismologist at Caltech. After having a read of the paper, here's what she had to say: This is a good example of bad science. The earthquake prediction heyday of the 1970s was launched and sustained by similar studies: people who found snippets of data after the fact that showed an apparent correlation between some signal and an eventual earthquake. This is not good statistics. You can't select data after the fact. In this case, there's no way to know what kind of fluctuations are normally seen in toad activity, or what else might have been going on in the study area that could have influenced toad behavior.

    Slashdot interpretation: Scientists Say Toads Can Predict Earthquakes!!!

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  2. Not only toads, also human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I would like to point out that Giampaolo Giuliani predicted that same earthquake measuring radon gas around there (link: http://www.nowpublic.com/environment/giampaolo-giuliani-laquila-earthquake-youtube-warning-ignored )

  3. Re:Pfft by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Informative

    Scientists are doing a lot of strange things nowadays ...Scientists Use Gene Splicing To Create Real "Cadbury Easter Eggs"

  4. That's nothing. by kirill.s · · Score: 2, Informative

    The same toads can also predict the release date of Duke Nukem Forever.

  5. Re:Don't RTFA by VJ42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's right. Don't read it. I'm going to summarize it for you:

    Some scientists noticed frogs acting "strange". A couple days later, an earthquake followed. Scientists wondered if the frogs were somehow aware of the earthquake. They had no particular reason to believe they were. Other scientists interviewed on this matter say probably not. People retroactively attribute all kinds of things to big events that follow.

    The article ends: "For now at least, the hunt for a way to predict earthquakes must continue."

    That's it. You're welcome.

    No, I heard the researcher on the radio yesterday; the toads unexpectedly left the area for a few days & whilst they were gone, the quake hit; the toads returned after the quake, she had a couple of hypotheses about how the toads could detect the coming quake, but freely admitted she had no strong evidence for them.

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  6. Re:Real funny thing by VJ42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nowadays, I can't tell the difference between your typical slashdot stories and April Fool's Day stories.

    Everyday is April Fool's day here.

    This isn't an April fools story, the BBC also has coverage. Note the date:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8593000/8593396.stm

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me