US Changes How Air Travelers Are Screened
Hugh Pickens writes "The Washington Post reports that the Obama administration is abandoning its policy of using nationality alone to determine which US-bound international air travelers should be subject to additional screening and will instead select passengers based on possible matches to intelligence information, including physical descriptions or a particular travel pattern. Under the new system, screeners will stop passengers for additional security if they match certain pieces of known intelligence. The system will be 'much more intel-based,' a senior administration official says, as opposed to brute force. For example if US intelligence authorities learned about a terrorism suspect from Asia who had recently traveled to the Middle East, and they knew the suspect's approximate age but not name or passport number, those fragments would be entered into a database, shared with commercial airline screeners abroad, and screeners would be instructed to look for people with those traits and to pull them aside for extra searches. Administration officials have said that, in hindsight, the central failure in the attempted bombing of an Amsterdam-to-Detroit flight on Christmas Day involved inadequate sharing of information." In other TSA-related news, CNN takes a look at the full-body scanners that are beginning to be deployed in the US and elsewhere, concluding that they are good at finding concealed drugs but haven't found much that could bring down an airplane. John Perry Barlow is quoted: "Every time technology makes another leap forward, we have to reclaim the Fourth Amendment, and often we have to reclaim the entire Bill of Rights, because technology gives [the authorities] powers that were not envisioned by the Founding Fathers."
Let's not be coy......the one thing they all seem to have common is they they're Muslim.
True enough. I probably should have put "whoever pulled anything off or came close to it." There's a lot of back-and-forth going on, though - many of the Al-Qaeda members do a lot of back-and-forth from Pakistan to the West.
Except those guys didn't try to commit crimes on airplanes. Also, by "Oklahoma bomber" I assume you mean Timothy McVeigh, who was not a terrorist. He was a badly misguided revolutionary.
24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
maybe that's because NZ don't topple democracies in the middle east, or install dictators, or direct those dictators to use weapons of mass destruction on their neighbors and own people, etc. no, they must hate us inexplicably. that way we don't have to question our behavior.
"If still these truths be held to be
Self evident."
-Edna St. Vincent Millay