Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Crawler Speaks Back

Last week we ran a story about Facebook suing to get a crawled dataset offline. This week we have a bit of a response written by Pete Warden, the guy who actually did the crawling. He followed robots.txt, and then Facebook's lawyers went after him. It's actually a quite interesting little tale and worth your time.

3 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. Re:obviously this is abusive by goldenseller01 · · Score: -1, Troll

    http://www.golden-seller.com/ Jersey $23 Sunglass $12 Purse: $12 Necklace $15 Bracelet $15 handbag $33 Bikini $23 http://www.golden-seller.com/ High quality,competitive price,accept paypal,fast delivery

  2. Re:Mark Zuckerberg by Jumperalex · · Score: 1, Troll

    "If he is the face of the next generation entrepreneurs, then [insert imaginary friend(s)] save the industry"

    There. Fixed that for ya.

    Annoying having someone tell you about your own beliefs isn't it?

    --
    If you can't be good, be good at it!
  3. I am not anything even by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I am not anything even approaching a lawyer, but I suspect his actions were probably legal. The Internet is a public medium, unless you specifically put walls around content, it has the same protection as if you posted fliers on a physical bulletin board in a public place. Yes, you retain copyright over your content, but you have ZERO ability to say "by reading this, you agree to additional terms". If I want to produce a review of all the fliers posted around town, I can. If I want to make excerpts (within "Fair Use") I can. Pretty much the only thing I can't legally do is deface them or copy them outright. Unless he was doing this from a logged in account, I can see how they can limit what sorts of derivative works he makes. (So long as the derivative doesn't violate copyright)
    How To Play The Most Economical China Mobile Phone The Difference Between Japanese Girls And Chinese Girls Indian Girl Into A Karate Black Belt