The Economist Weighs In For Shorter Copyright Terms

lxmota writes "The Economist says that long copyright terms are hindering creativity, and that shortening them is the way to go: 'Largely thanks to the entertainment industry's lawyers and lobbyists, copyright's scope and duration have vastly increased. In America, copyright holders get 95 years' protection as a result of an extension granted in 1998, derided by critics as the "Mickey Mouse Protection Act." They are now calling for even greater protection, and there have been efforts to introduce similar terms in Europe. Such arguments should be resisted: it is time to tip the balance back.'"

Comments

Who reads The Economist?

[sugarmotor]

I never read anything useful in The Economist.

Here they are disappointing again, with a really short article, short compared to the scope of the topic. It can really only count as a draft; maybe the author was interrupted, and clicked Submit by accident?

Stephan

Re:When they're right, they're right

[Grimbleton]

I can't tell if you're retarded, but from reading your reply you are. Please re-read what I replied to, followed by my reply.