Slashdot Mirror


The Fruit Fly Drosophila Gets a New Name

G3ckoG33k writes "The name of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster will change to Sophophora melangaster. The reason is that scientists have by now discovered some 2,000 species of the genus and it is becoming unmanageably large. Unfortunately, the 'type species' (the reference point of the genus), Drosophila funebris, is rather unrelated to the D. melanogaster, and ends up in a distant part of the relationship tree. However, geneticists have, according to Google Scholar, more than 300,000 scientific articles describing innumerable aspects of the species, and will have to learn the new name as well as remember the old. As expected, the name change has created an emotional (and practical) stir all over media. While name changes are frequent in science, as they describe new knowledge about relationships between species, these changes rarely hit economically relevant species, and when they do, people get upset."

19 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. Backwards compatibility by bjourne · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it only in software we care about backwards compatiblity? This new name change will break thousands of studies which now references a fly does not exist. Journalists with only a fleeting aquantaince to biology will be confused about Drosophila melanogaster and its new name which leads to worse science reporting. This seems like gratitious breakage, where if an analysis was made the costs would be found much higher than the benefits.

    1. Re:Backwards compatibility by bmo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Somehow humanity doesn't dump a core over a new word

      It doesn't?

      Where the hell have you been?

      What about the fights over gender identifying words and political correctness? Gott im himmel, get out from under your rock. Core dump? Entire political movements have been centered around whether we should use certain euphemisms.

      That chair has no legs, it has "limbs" - Victorian era
      That's not a retard, that's a "special person" - Modern times.

      --
      BMO

    2. Re:Backwards compatibility by bmo · · Score: 3, Funny

      To follow up to myself, and to apply this to myself, please don't call me "a person of size"

      I'm fat.

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:Backwards compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      but Big Massive Object is okay?

  2. Re:It's not Sophophora yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Exactly. Read the article. Mod summary down.

  3. 50% of the species I have memorized by Protoslo · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It was very difficult for the commissioners," says Ellinor Michel, the commission's executive secretary. "It was a question of celebrity, as everyone knows D. melanogaster."

    That would certainly be awkward...if we lose Drosophila melanogaster, the only full binomial I will know from memory will be Homo sapiens. I'll have to memorize the name Caenorhabditis (of C. elegans fame) or something, and that will truly be a tragedy.

    1. Re:50% of the species I have memorized by selven · · Score: 4, Funny

      3x + 5

      There, you know two binomials again.

  4. Lyrical summary by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sophophora was Drosophila
    Now it's Sophophora, not Drosophila
    Not been a long time gone, Drosophila
    Now it's bug filled time on a moonlit night
    Every fly that was Drosophila
    Lives in Sophophora, not Drosophila
    So if you had a fly in Drosophila
    It'll be waiting in Sophophora
    Even old pluto, was once a planet
    Why they changed it I can't say
    People didn't like it better that way
    So take me back to Drosophila
    No, you can't go back to Drosophila
    Been a long time gone, Drosophila
    Why did Drosophila get the works?
    That's nobody's business but the Scientists
    Sophophora (Sophophora)
    Sophophora (Sophophora)
    Even old pluto, was once a planet
    Why they changed it I can't say
    People didn't like it better that way
    Sophophora was Drosophila
    Now it's Sophophora, not Drosophila
    Not been a long time gone, Drosophila
    Why did Drosophila get the works?
    That's nobody's business but the Scientists
    So take me back to Drosophila
    No, you can't go back to Drosophila
    Been a long time gone, Drosophila
    Why did Drosophila get the works?
    That's nobody's business but the scientists
    Sophophora

    (with apologies to They Might Be Giants)

    ---

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Lyrical summary by bmo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you need to do more than merely apologize to TMBG.

      You need to buy them a new meter, because you bloody well broke it there.

      --
      BMO

    2. Re:Lyrical summary by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

      BURMA SHAVE

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  5. Re:No surprise by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Translation: "I was on the losing side of this debate, so I'm bitching about the process."

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  6. Are they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    going to change the name of time flies too?

  7. Re:No surprise by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    At least the popular name is staying the same. I'd hate it if they ruined my favorite entomological pun: "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  8. I bet Pluto ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... feels better, now.

  9. Re:Not Sophophora melangaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe its because biology students are first exposed to it in their sophomore year at college.

  10. Re:No surprise by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can!

    Any planet-like bodies that are Pluto-sized or larger are "Planets."

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  11. Re:No surprise by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good point. And since Jupiter's mass ratio to the Sun is close to what Earth's is to Jupiter, I think we should just call Jupiter "a really crappy star."

    Or maybe for classifying celestial objects it's not the size of the body, it's the motion of the fundamental forces ;)

  12. I was hoping for... by mace9984 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jeff Goldblum :(

  13. Re:No surprise by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    {sigh}

    And "Informative"? Really?

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/