Slashdot Mirror


StarCraft Cheating Scandal Rocks Korea

dotarray writes with this snippet: "The largest scandal in e-sports history is currently unfolding in Korea, with revelations that a number of current pro gamers are involved with match setups and illegal betting. While the gamers are unnamed at this point, the story is said to touch many A-list StarCraft celebrities, including sAviOr, Ja Mae Yoon, one of the best-known and most successful players of all time."

6 of 471 comments (clear)

  1. When money is involved by Kitkoan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some people will do anything to get even more money. Its also possible that some of the Starcraft players are seeing a dead end of their time playing gaming professionally. As in they might not be that great at most RTS games, but amazing at Starcraft. And with Starcraft 2 coming along closer and closer, it might be the writing on the wall for Starcraft 1's viability. Cash out while they can and all?

    --
    Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
  2. Re:Who cares? by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, if I was betting on the outcome of a contest between two people, I would sure as hell care if they were fixing the outcome and I wouldn't say I am stupid.

    Oh, I get it, you just wanted a first post and had nothing better to post than racism. Guess who looks stupid now?

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  3. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "You can't know criminals' names in Korea? Kind of weird."

    It has it's positives i.e. vigilante justice and not getting ones life ruined if accused of a heinus crime (pedophelia, sexual assault, etc).

    In america I find the fact they publish the names of sex offenders grotesque because rehabilitation and re-entering society to lead a normal life is impossible, this vigalante mob justice has never sat well with me.

  4. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by rebot777 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's most likely you can't know alleged criminals names for their protection. A concern I have with current US society is the media's influence on our views of 'alleged criminals'. If you're in a high profile case and it turns out you're not guilty the inertia of public opinion against you for being accused can haunt you for the rest of your life. I believe these laws are in response to such situations.

  5. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Probably because his name is typically written in Hangul?

  6. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Cimexus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I doubt they have an equivalent. Even in other ~Western~ countries there is often no equivalent of such a registry. It's one of those things I always found a bit odd about America actually.

    Where I live, you either don't release a serious criminal who is going to have a tendency to re-offend, or tabs are kept on them in other ways (house confinement, surveillance, radio bracelets etc.). I mean sure, the people who live nearby to the to-be-released sex offender will be notified and have a right to object to/block the offender moving into that area. But that doesn't extend to the whole world being able to punch in a random address and see who's around.

    I'm not American so I may have misinterpreted what the Registry actually does. If so I apologise. But my impression was that ~anyone~ can search for nearby offenders ~anywhere~, even if that location has nothing to do with them.