Slashdot Mirror


ACTA Draft To Be Made Public Next Week

Spitfirem1 writes with this snippet from ZDNet: "Negotiators will on Wednesday publish the first officially released draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a new treaty designed to harmonize copyright enforcement around the world. The decision to release the consolidated draft on 21 April was made at the eighth round of Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) negotiations, which took place this week in Wellington, New Zealand. So far, the only publicly available information on the negotiating countries' proposals and amendments have been leaked documents purporting to be drafts of the agreement."

7 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Obama's "transparent" government by Fluffeh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can bet the US wasn't behind this decision.

    You can bet that the lobbyists within the US weren't behind this decision.

    There, think that's more on the point now. I wouldn't at all be surprised if some members of the US party in these negotiations isn't secretly crying out "Booyah!" while putting on their "Oh dear, I'm sorry that happened..." face to the lobbyists who give them money.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  2. Treaty? by tpstigers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really? I can't help but laugh. Treaties are diplomatic tools we use to end wars. Or avoid then.

  3. Guilty until proven innocent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Since this treaty will hold ISPs liable for alleged copyright infringement of pass-through content by its users, we can expect new levels of monitoring and three-strikes you're out.

    This won't stop copyright infringement (as its currently defined), but it may slow it down a bit - for a while. And at the price of turning content carriers into the internet police. The results will be pretty chilling for the average joe, and I wonder what this will mean for media sites like YouTube, whose parent company is rolling in enough cash and clout to bribe, cajole and fight this as they see fit.

    This is the worst thing since DCMA, which is another 4 letter disaster.

  4. Re:Spoiler by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spoiler: you're not going to like any of it. At all.

    That's assuming they release the real thing...

    I wouldn't be too surprised if they released a decoy. Last time there were such talks, they were killed when they came under the public eye. So a bland document would be a good way to defuse the situation.

    Of course that's assuming anybody cares about it nowadays which might be a bit optimistic of me.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  5. Re:Why fear terrorists... by jo42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And over 400,000 die every year from consuming Tobacco products. So which is the greater evil? The Terrorist or The Tobacco industry?

  6. Re:mass civil disobedence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    At least it doesn't randomly lose commits like git does.

  7. Re:Why fear terrorists... by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While this is true, do note that the destruction (perhaps think in terms of $) also caused by 9/11 was considerable, and that additional casualties may have been incurred via illness caused from toxins or toxic debris, not to mention overall disruption and panic.

    Not that I'm supporting the US government's subsequent (increased) trampling of rights.