Slashdot Mirror


This Is Apple's Next iPhone

An anonymous reader writes "There has been some speculation about it. Not anymore: 'This is Apple's next iPhone. It was found lost in a bar in Redwood City, camouflaged to look like an iPhone 3GS. We got it. We disassembled it. It's the real thing, and here are all the details.' Judging by Gizmodo's reaction, it looks like a winner."

7 of 492 comments (clear)

  1. Suuuure, it was "found" by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And they "got" it from whom? Directly from Larry Lightfingers, or via Frankie the Fence?

    J'accuse: they're dealing in stolen property, and they know it, or should know it. But ethics be damned, because ZOMG IPHOAAAN!!!!11! Right?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Suuuure, it was "found" by martas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      either that, or this is yet another "accidental" leak by apple.

  2. Apples Marketing Department by affenhund · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Embarrassing, how the media got played to do advertisement for them. Goodbye, journalism.

  3. Re:FAIL! by Altus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According the TFA the phone was functional before being remotely wiped by Apple. Certainly people do walk around with camouflaged, functional engineering samples during the testing cycle for new phones. I know employees at Nokia are often given pre-release hardware to try out both in the building (early testing) and outside the building (later in testing)

    It really does sound like this is a real unit. It may have been leaked intentionally but that doesn't make it less relevant.

    The only thing that makes me suspicious is that I cant find any report on what chip it is using. I would expect them to say something about that, even if all they said was that the processor didn't have any markings on it. I would think that would be one of the first things they would look at.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  4. Re:FAIL! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Apple sure pulled the wool over your eyes. What, do you think after "accidentally" letting the phone fall into the hands of the press, Apple was going to act like it wanted it to happen? No, because that give them just enough plausible deniability so that folks like you will make statements like -

    It doesn't sounds like marketing to me.

    This is classic textbook Apple advertising of a new product. Next some specs will be leaked and posted online, and after sufficient time that anybody is interested can see them, Apple will start issuing takedown notices. Are all of you really not going to remember that Apple has done stuff like this in the past??

    "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me dozens of times, I'm an Apple customer."

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  5. Re:iSick of it by bonch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've had more iPad news in the last weeks than Linux news in the last months.

    Um...no, we haven't. In fact, there's barely been any iPad news. Meanwhile, there was a story about Linux not attracting young developers, an analysis of Linux's shared kernel memory, GPL compliance checking in embedded software, how Android's Linux changes will make it back to the main source tree, how the WePad tablet will use Linux, etc.

    I get that Apple competitors post here and are trying to drum up some lame anti-Apple sentiment, but lying will get you nowhere.

  6. Re:FAIL! by Anonymusing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple is clearly no longer the leader. This phone is their admission of that fact. They hope packaging will save them.

    Apple was never the leader in features or chipsets. However, they are the leaders in packaging, marketing, and UI (the latter being disputable by some folks, especially on Slashdot). And those things translate into mindshare and sales.

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right