Adding Some Spice To *nix Shell Scripts

An anonymous reader writes "Developing GUI script-based applications is time-consuming and expensive. Most Unix-based scripts run in a CLI mode or over a secure ssh session. The Unix shells are quite sophisticated programming languages in their own right: they are easy to design and quick to build, but they are not user-friendly in the same way the Unix commands aren't (see the Unix haters books). Both Unix and bash provide features for writing user friendly scripts using various tools to build powerful, interactive, user-friendly scripts that run under the bash shell on Linux or Unix. What tools do you use that spice up your scripts on the Linux or Unix platforms?"

Comments

None!

[Anrego]

I know this is troll-ish, but the way I view it a script is just that.. a script. A series of commands to be executed in a specific order designed to automate a repetative task. Basic logic, control, and input are generally ok.. but interaction is in my opinion an indicator that your task is out of scope for a "script" and should become a full fledged application.

(you may now freely argue amongst yourselves on the difference between a script and an application)

There are a metric ass-tonne of dialog-type apps out there .. just google for your favorite toolkits prefix and "dialog" and you'll probably find something..

gdialog
kdialog
xdialog
etc..

Consistency is the only spice ...

[bhepple]

As said previously, scripts are scripts and don't often need a GUI. But for grep's sake, make them consistent!!! The only spicing up _really_ needed are some standards:

o output errors to STDERR; normal output to STDOUT
o include (-h, --help) processing - and send it to STDOUT so the help can be piped to 'less'
o use getopt(1) or process-getopt(1) so that options on the CLI parse in a predictable and standard way
o keep it terse except for errors so that the user can easily see if it worked or not without scanning vast output
o provide a --verbose option to help with tracking down those errors

... and the most annoying thing of all - make sure --help _always_ works, even if the script body itself can't - at least the user can then be told about what the prerequisites are.
Head over to http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ for much wisdom on how to write better bash scripts.

Re:None, I have given up bash scripting

[camperdave]

You still need to work with the user's files, which will inevitably have spaces in them. If a space is a valid character in the filesystem then your scripts need to reflect that. Erroring out is not a valid solution.