Slashdot Mirror


Colleague Comes Forward To Defend Anthrax Suspect

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times writes about Henry S. Heine, a former Army microbiologist who worked for years with Bruce E. Ivins, whom the FBI has blamed for the anthrax letter attacks that killed five people in 2001. Heine told a 16-member National Academy of Sciences panel reviewing the FBI's scientific work on the investigation that he believes it is impossible that the deadly spores could have been produced undetected in Ivins's laboratory, as the FBI asserts. Heine told the panel that producing the quantity of spores in the letters would have taken at least a year of intensive work using the equipment at the army lab, an effort that would not have escaped colleagues' notice. Lab technicians who worked closely with Ivins have told Heine they saw no such work. Heine adds that, in addition, the biological containment measures where Ivins worked were inadequate to prevent the spores from floating out of the laboratory into animal cages and offices. 'You'd have had dead animals or dead people.' Asked why he is speaking out now, almost two years after Ivins's suicide, Heine says that Army officials had prohibited comment on the case, silencing him until he left the government laboratory. Although Heine does not dispute that there was a genetic link between the spores in the letters and the anthrax in Ivins's flask, Heine says samples from the flask were widely shared. 'Whoever did this is still running around out there. I truly believe that.'"

6 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Anthrax... by maxume · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure they would. But the other 299,999,950 of us need to decide if such attacks warrant as much attention as, say, car accidents.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  2. Re:Anthrax... by Beelzebud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who in the hell said it was an epidemic? It was a targeted attack, and people died at the places it was sent.

    Who said you should spend your time worrying about it?

  3. Re:Anthrax... by dave562 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "blown out of proportion" aspect of the story was the "threat of terrorism". The anthrax attacks hit the Capitol at the same time legislators were being pressured to pass the PATRIOT Act. The anthrax attacks delivered the unspoken message to our representatives that "nobody is safe from terrorists".

  4. Re:this story is made for paranoid schizophrenics by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No it screams government incompetence. Someone sent the samples. The FBI jumped to conclusions and harassed a man to death that they thought was a suspect.

    It's not the first time. Remember Richard Jewell? After he saved countless lives by noticing a suspicious backpack and evacuating the area around it in Centennial Olympic Park, he was first hailed as a hero. The FBI investigated him for no other reason than he fit the profile of a lone bomber despite having no background with bomb making. What's worse is that he FBI leaked that he was a suspect. After a trial in the media and having all his possessions thoroughly search by the FBI, it wasn't until months later that a US Attorney (and not the FBI) declared he was no longer a suspect. Years later Eric Rudolph admitted he planted the bombs.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  5. Re:Silence != Truth by b4upoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It really makes me wonder if overzealous nuts in the Bush regime could have caused anthrax to be let lose to justify our military actions. I have no trust at all after things like WaterGate and the arms for drugs crap that went on under republican administrations.

  6. Re:Anthrax... by X0563511 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure "this guy" is more qualified than you to make the call.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...