Slashdot Mirror


Supreme Court To Rule On State Video Game Regulation

DJRumpy sends in this quote from an AP report:"The Supreme Court will decide whether free speech rights are more important than helping parents keep violent material away from children. The justices agreed Monday to consider reinstating California's ban on the sale or rental of violent video games to minors, a law the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco threw out last year on grounds that it violated minors' constitutional rights. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who signed the law in 2005, said he was pleased the high court would review the appeals court decision. He said, 'We have a responsibility to our kids and our communities to protect against the effects of games that depict ultra-violent actions, just as we already do with movies.'" SCOTUSblog has a more thorough legal description of the case.

4 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Industry self-regulates by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Informative

    The charge for video game censorship has been led by Democrats in California and New York. Hillary Clinton has considered it one of her personal crusades.

    I won't begin to suggest all Democrats are evil. I'm a middle of the road guy. But suggesting that this is a Republican issue just isn't factually correct.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  2. Re:Industry self-regulates by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't want the goverment to tell me how to raise my kids.

    They aren't, they're telling your kids how [not] to raise themselves. There's nothing to stop you buying restricted games for them, if you want.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Re:"We" don't have a responsibility ... by Theaetetus · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, that's not the point of the bill. The point of the bill is that the Gov't knows better than the parent what is or is not appropriate for their child.

    No, it doesn't. The bill doesn't prevent a parent from buying any game they want for their child. It merely prevents a store from selling directly to the child without parental permission. You want your 10 year old to play GTA, then go buy a copy for them.

  4. Re:Industry self-regulates by DeadboltX · · Score: 3, Informative

    They aren't making it illegal for kids to play M rated games, nor are they making it illegal for parents to buy M rated games for their children. They are preventing M rated games from being sold directly to minors, just as R rated movie tickets are. If you are a parent and you find it ok for your minor to see an R rated movie then you are more than able to purchase the R rated ticket for them, just as you are more than able to purchase the M rated game for them.