Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Researchers Make Plastic Out of Water

greenrainbow writes with this excerpt from Inhabit: "The material shown in the picture above is just ice, right? Look again. Elastic water, a new substance invented by researchers at Tokyo University, is a jelly-like substance made up of 95% water along with two grams of clay and a small amount of organic materials. As is, the all-natural substance is perfect for medical procedures, because it's made of water, poses no harm to people, and is perfect for mending tissue. And, if the research team can increase the density of this exciting new substance, it could be used in place of our current oil-based plastics for a host of other things."

117 comments

  1. First Post by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    Woohoo, plastic water, just what I need! (:

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    1. Re:First Post by OrwellianLurker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great, now dolphins can choke on water too.

      --
      'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' - Mao Tse-tung
    2. Re:First Post by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      oh great, way to take the wind out of my sails. ):

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    3. Re:First Post by Jarnin · · Score: 5, Funny

      When asked about potential choking hazard to dolphins, the Japanese scientists were quoted saying, "Fuck you dolphin!"

    4. Re:First Post by StoneOldman79 · · Score: 1

      No, they probably want to use them to choke whales for more "research".
      Those Japanese scientists never bothered to look it up...
      Dolphins and whales are mammals and you can choke them pretty easily in plain old seawater.
      Big waste of time if you ask me.

    5. Re:First Post by skine · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Why can't they be more like us and kill chickens and cows?

    6. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they had turned to chickens now.

    7. Re:First Post by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Well they already do choke on water, they're mammals :P

  2. Blurry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Wow, that's one blurry photograph.

  3. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    any one else thinking of ice nine?

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rice Nine.

    2. Re:hmm by tzot · · Score: 1

      Yep, ice-9. That's what I thought at first, too. Then, while reading the article (something about eventually decreasing the density), I thought "new replacement for silicone used in breast implants". Then I combined the two and resulted with something marginally better than a plastic doll.

      --
      I speak England very best
    3. Re:hmm by Opyros · · Score: 1

      That was the second thing I thought of – the first was "polywater".

    4. Re:hmm by Black+Gold+Alchemist · · Score: 1

      aisu-kyuu? (Means ice nine in japanese).

      --
      Responsibility is an addiction
      Virtue is a temptation
      Community is a cartel
    5. Re:hmm by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ice and breasts? Sounds like my last girlfriend...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because this isn't a new allotrope of water. It's a homogeneous mixture.

    7. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like 3,2

  4. It's not April First by dunng808 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know Japan is a day ahead, but April Fools Day was last month.

    --

    Gary Dunn
    Open Slate Project

    1. Re:It's not April First by dunng808 · · Score: 1

      what's-kanji-for-boffin -- interi?

      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

  5. Whatever... by thestudio_bob · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not impressed. I read somewhere where some guy turned water into wine. Not that's impressive.

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
    1. Re:Whatever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's easy, just add sugar and yeast.

    2. Re:Whatever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You kid and all, but he did do it instantly. Let's also remember wine is made with grapes not grains.

    3. Re:Whatever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he? Bear in mind that none of the accounts of jesus are first hand.

    4. Re:Whatever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes it even more believable! He didn't even say he did it, he just did it.

    5. Re:Whatever... by mmkkbb · · Score: 1
      --
      -mkb
    6. Re:Whatever... by Svippy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not impressed. I read somewhere where some guy turned water into wine. Not that's impressive.

      Aren't you hard to impress?

      Yes, I am calling him out on his typo.

      --
      Clicked pie.
    7. Re:Whatever... by Pikoro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yah, homeopathic history. The farther from the original event they are recorded, and the more times it has been passed by word of mouth before it's committed to some more permanent medium, the more believable it is.

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    8. Re:Whatever... by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      No he didn't, hell, there's not even any proof the dude existed

  6. Elastic water by mindbrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Take this on desert treks. You can stretch it over a much longer time.

    --
    ideopath @ play
  7. Fine... by rmushkatblat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would be interesting to know exactly what the other "organic materials" are, and how they made it.

    1. Re:Fine... by snowraver1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jello mix

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:Fine... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Here's the nature article (paywall):
      http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7279/full/nature08693.html

      When I couldn't find it in the most recent nature issue,
      I looked a little harder and noticed TFA was published Jan 25th.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Fine... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I was about to say - because it looks not like ice, but like gelatin.

    4. Re:Fine... by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      ***It would be interesting to know exactly what the other "organic materials" are***

      My spies tell me they are

      Eye of newt, and toe of frog,
      Wool of bat, and tongue of dog,
      Adder's fork, and blind-worm's sting,
      Lizard's leg, and howlet's wing

      Let's see if the USTPO can recognize the prior art once this stuff is reformulated into patent speak.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    5. Re:Fine... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ricin. From Castor oil seeds.

      Organic, so it is perfectly harmless. Right? Right??

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  8. Already invented eons ago by t0qer · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:Already invented eons ago by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I stopped being impressed the instant I found that it was only 95% water. Lettuce is also 95% water (depending on the variety, you can look them up at a USDA website).

      That’s the whole idea of an aerosol or gel. It’s mostly one substance because of its properties that you like, but has just enough of another substance (that also has certain properties that you like) to give the overall gel or aerosol those properties.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Already invented eons ago by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That shows your lack of understanding.

      Yes, it's impressive. If it were totally water it wouldn't be impressive, it would be unbelievable.

      There are several questions, of course. Like how much will it cost to make? Is it really as green as it sounds? (Water + clay sounds pretty green.) How much will it be possible to adjust it's properties? What tensile strength can be achieved? What compressive strength? Can it be made edible? Is it a good diet food? Et, multitudinous, cetera.

      Now this isn't up in the range of being as impressive as a working assembler, but it's in the range of a bio-compatible steel. (Makes me wonder... could you lay down conductive traces in it and have them remain in position? Might turn out to be just the thing for dynamic connections to nerve cells. [Probably not, but it's possible.])

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Already invented eons ago by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      There are several questions, of course. Like how much will it cost to make? Is it really as green as it sounds? (Water + clay sounds pretty green.) How much will it be possible to adjust it's properties? What tensile strength can be achieved? What compressive strength? Can it be made edible? Is it a good diet food? Et, multitudinous, cetera.

      Sure... start answering those sort of questions, and I might be impressed. Or might not. But simply announcing that you’ve made a gel from water is unimpressive. TFA was very light on details.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  9. Attention Japanese Science-fidels by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Informative

    We "invented" this a couple of hundred years ago. We call it "jelly" in civilised lands, or "jello" in the colonies. kthxbye.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Attention Japanese Science-fidels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you were trying to be funny, but:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konjac

    2. Re:Attention Japanese Science-fidels by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      jelly is what you put on toast

    3. Re:Attention Japanese Science-fidels by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      We "invented" this a couple of hundred years ago. We call it "jelly" in civilised lands, or "jello" in the colonies. kthxbye.

      Sure, but it's a whole class of materials called gels.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gel

      "Gels are defined as a substantially dilute crosslinked system, which exhibits no flow when in the steady-state."

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    4. Re:Attention Japanese Science-fidels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Only in America. Everywhere else (English speaking), jam is what you put on toast.

    5. Re:Attention Japanese Science-fidels by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

      We (in America) also put jam on toast. Jam has bits of fruit in it and is generally softer than jelly. Jelly is fruit-flavored gelatin. Jell-O is a brand that, like Xerox, has become synonymous with its product.

    6. Re:Attention Japanese Science-fidels by Randle_Revar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is jello regional like Xerox? Because here in the Northwest most people use "Xerox" only as a proper noun.

      And I don't know about elsewhere, but here people only use "jello" for gelatin if you make it from a powder, and eat it by itself, regardless of brand. If solid gelatin is premade and in a jar and you put it on bread or something, it is always "jelly".

    7. Re:Attention Japanese Science-fidels by aquila.solo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've almost always heard Xerox (ab)used like Google: As a synonym for the act of photocopying, the machine used in that act, the results of that act ("hand me that Xerox over there"), etc. Only context tells you what's intended. As for regional variations, I couldn't tell you. I've lived in four states (Virginia, New Mexico, Nebraska, Utah) and Xerox and Jell-O both seem to be in pretty wide usage. What really seems to vary is the word used to indicate a sweetened, carbonated beverage. That can change between zip codes. I would agree with your last statement. Jelly is usually a condiment, and Jell-O is the stand alone dessert. But it's all the same stuff ultimately: you take powdered gelatin, sugar, fruit juice (if you're doing it right) or artificial flavor (if you're doing it wrong) and boil them in water for a while.

    8. Re:Attention Japanese Science-fidels by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

      Dang it. The one time I forget to preview is the one time I don't put in
      tags.

      Grr.

    9. Re:Attention Japanese Science-fidels by Chaset · · Score: 1

      Always thought "jelly" is fruit with pectin as a solidifying agent. If it has gelatin, then it had various names.

      --
      -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
  10. Nice units, blog writers! by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a jelly-like substance made up of 95% water along with two grams of clay and a small amount of organic materials.

    It also takes 7 minutes and 8% of your time to set after you mix the ingredients together.

    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    1. Re:Nice units, blog writers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's fix it...

      x = total sample mass
      2g = 0.05x
      x = 40g

      Sample mass minus clay mass:
      40g - 2g = 38g water
      ...

      38g water from before, times 1.004 mL/g (buoyancy corrected density of water at 25C)
      38g (1.004 mL/g) = 38.15 mL
      2g clay is dissolved in 38.15 mL water

    2. Re:Nice units, blog writers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just grouped together clay and the other organic materials. But in reality
      1, we don't know their ratio
      2, don't know what the other organic materials are

    3. Re:Nice units, blog writers! by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 1

      I neglected 'small amounts' as being journalistically synonymous with 'trace amounts'.

  11. Walking on water. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, so that's how Jesus did it.

  12. Interesting Other Properties as Well by itsdrewmiller · · Score: 1

    Apparently this new substance melts at 45.8 degrees Celsius.

    1. Re:Interesting Other Properties as Well by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Useless in the tropics, then, eh?

  13. water + clay + organic = god made a human? by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is it like some sort of a water bag/pocket, only if it tears it will not leak, is it sort of like Jelo?

    The story has no details, it's water + clay + some organic stuff.

    Sounds like what god was using to throw together the first human prototype. Are these guys from Tokyo god?

    1. Re:water + clay + organic = god made a human? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The story has no details, it's water + clay + some organic stuff.

      That's the Jell-O you dropped on the ground by accident.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  14. remember aquaplastics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on X-COM Terror From the Deep (circa 1996), there was this fictional alien material called aquaplastics...which could be used to build armor.

  15. Cool, but.... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cool, but old news. Haven't really heard anything about it since (other than rehashes of that same info from Oct)

    1. Re:Cool, but.... by one-eye-johnson · · Score: 1

      Thanks for linking to the actual paper. The other article was completely non-informative.

    2. Re:Cool, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is OT, so I'm posting Anon, but after reading your username, and seeing what you did I almost shit my pants.

  16. I for one... by grnbrg · · Score: 0, Troll

    welcome our new water-based, plastic overlords!

    1. Re:I for one... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      welcome our new water-based, plastic overlords!

      This is not the Kool Aid you seek. Nothing to see here. Move along.

  17. more by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    natural

    breast

    implants

    that is all

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:more by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And suddenly I think we might actually see this stuff getting mass produced.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:more by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they are implanted, they are by definition not natural. Sorry. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:more by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      That depends on how you define "natural".

      It's perfectly reasonable to call an implant "natural" if the material it's made of is natural (i.e., not man-made). In this case, they'd be compared to silicone implants, which don't fit anyone's definition of "natural".

      On the other hand, this substance itself is man-made, so it can't be "natural" (but not for the reason you state). I would hazard a guess that they feel more natural than the silicone implants.

    4. Re:more by dhalgren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The implants may be natural, but that doesn't mean that the breasts are.

    5. Re:more by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Right, but when you say "natural breast implants" (as the original post that Hurricane78 was responding to did), "natural" refers to the implants, not the breasts. Besides that, if you really wanted to get precise, I think most breasts are natural. It's the internals of the breasts that are artificial. The external breasts themselves are still (AFAIK) still skin tissue.

    6. Re:more by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0

      When was the last time you used actual speech to talk to someone? ;)

      Is it “natural breasts implants” or “natural breats implants

      It is obvious, that we meant the former, not the latter, since the latter is not something, someone would want, since for us “users”, it would make no difference if the implants were natural. What counts is if the breasts are natural.

      So whooosh. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:more by bhartman34 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What matters to the end user (which would be males or lesbians, I suppose) is that the breasts in question feel natural. In terms of actually being natural, if they feel natural and look natural, for all intents and purposes, for the end user, they are natural.

      As with all other prosthetics, what matters is the function and the perception, not the strict reality.

      What you were born with naturally isn't part of your character traits. It's an accident of genetics. The only thing to be embarrassed about with prosthetic breasts is, therefore, poor workmanship.

  18. Good! by bynary · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...because if there's one thing the human race doesn't need for survival, it's definitely water.

    --
    http://www.bynarystudio.com
  19. OMG!!! It's ICE 9!!! by RedCharlie · · Score: 1

    ...for the Vonnegut fans out there...

  20. Old news is old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10441604-1.html

  21. Pretty easy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. when you the use water off of Louisiana.

  22. The secret is... by falken0905 · · Score: 1

    That all of the necessary chemicals to make plastic are already in our polluted water. They have simply found a way to make it congeal.

  23. *ANOTHER* Misleading Title..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Again, the "Wizards" at SlashDot let ANOTHER crappy and purely misleading title make its way into "News":

    ".....95% water along with two grams of clay and a small amount of organic materials."

    -So, in all ACTUALITY, the researchers did *NOT* make plastic out of water, the made it out of water, clay, and other chemicals, but not just water.

    This use of water is no more remarkable than the use of other absorbant polymers or hydrogels, such as Super Slurper, or for an organic material, Gelatin.

    It's about time somebody started seeing such "discoveries" for what they really are: Re-hashed Crap. I'm waiting to see a SlashDot article where somebody discovers The Wheel.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    1. Re:*ANOTHER* Misleading Title..... by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

      Obligatory KOTH quote:

      Dale Gribble: "If you want, I can teach you how to make a bomb out of a toilet paper roll and a stick of dynamite."

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    2. Re:*ANOTHER* Misleading Title..... by jelizondo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently you missed it

      --
      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
    3. Re:*ANOTHER* Misleading Title..... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Actually, I find the claim of 95% water interesting, because I would have figured that most plastics were substantially more than 5% backbone elements (carbon, silicon, nitrogen, sulfur, and other nonmetals that can sustain more than two covalent bonds per atom, so that you can chain them end-to-end with one another in long molecules and still attach other stuff at the sides). Water contains only oxygen and hydrogen, neither of which, so far as I am aware, is known to form chains more than three atoms long (well, hydrogen does when it's solid, but it's more metal than plastic, and furthermore it reverts to a diatomic gas if you look at it funny or let the temperature rise much above zero kelvins).

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    4. Re:*ANOTHER* Misleading Title..... by Zerth · · Score: 1

      I also like how they confused plastic(as in deformation) with plastic(as in chained hydrocarbons)

    5. Re:*ANOTHER* Misleading Title..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

      Please accept my sincere apologies for any inconvenience.

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    6. Re:*ANOTHER* Misleading Title..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you expect this new material to be made 100% of water? Any normal person would read the title and reason that this new plastic would be mostly water, not %100 water.

  24. self-healing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also has a high mechanical strength and self mends when damaged.

    Either the article is wrong, or it has some very interesting properties.

  25. Aerogel anyone? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aerogel* is also only 2% silica and 98% air. Doesn’t mean it’s made out of air.
    This is a material out of clay, that can bind lots of water. Just like aerogel binds lots of air.

    ___
    * Btw, my favorite of all “normal” materials on this planet. :) (The favorite abnormal is definitely a Bose-Einstein condensate!)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Aerogel anyone? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Aerogel* is also only 2% silica and 98% air. Doesn’t mean it’s made out of air.
      This is a material out of clay, that can bind lots of water. Just like aerogel binds lots of air.

      ___
      * Btw, my favorite of all “normal” materials on this planet. :) (The favorite abnormal is definitely a Bose-Einstein condensate!)

      And as you might expect, this one is called a hydrogel. The novel part isn't that it has a lot of water in it - much more dilute hydrogels are trivially produced and have been since before I was born. I think the interesting part here, without RTFA, is that this is a ceramic instead of an elastomer.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  26. One solution was invented decades ago... by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1

    I can't remember if it was Popular Science, Popular Mechanics or Mechanix Illustrated, but at least 25 years ago I read an article about an invention that would be ideal for such a spill.
    It was a large dome that floated mostly underwater, with a cupula sticking out of the top with baffles that directed waves into the center.
    The wave action essentially pumped the oil floating on the surface (and water) into the dome, and since the oil floats, the water was pushed out of the bottom. It was designed to be deployed as an array for very large spills such as this one.

    --
    - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
  27. Water Bottles by undecim · · Score: 1

    Sounds like an excellent marketing ploy for bottled water companies

    --
    The Internet has given stupid people the resources of intelligent people.
  28. "because it's made of water, poses no harm" by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Water, clay and "organic materials". What if the "organic materials" are dysentery amoeba, Ebola virus, or cyanide? Suddenly 95% water doesn't mean as much.

  29. Safe for human use? by sodafox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because it is 95% water does not mean it is necessarily safe for human use. Aside from a little clay, what is the rest of that 5% of 'organic material'? Formaldehyde is an organic material, and I would not want that put into my body in any great quantity.

    1. Re:Safe for human use? by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It can't be both an exciting new substance, and safe for human use.

      If it's new, how are you sure it's safe?
      You must mean it doesn't immediately poison you or asphyxiate you or stab you.
      Before I can be sure it's safe (if it's new) I want the bejesus tested out of it.

      Care to start testing it by slapping a wad of it on your arm for a week or two? Breathe deeply.

    2. Re:Safe for human use? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Formaldehyde is an organic material, and I would not want that put into my body in any great quantity.

      - that's because you are not as cool yet as a pharaoh.

  30. whaa? by dissy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First:

    is a jelly-like substance made up of 95% water along with two grams of clay and a small amount of organic materials.

    Then:

    because it's made of water, poses no harm to people

    That's about as reassuring as saying "This 95% water and 5% deadly deadly poison solution will be completely safe to inject directly into your bloodstream, since it is made completely out of water!"

  31. A photographer's POV by Alexvthooft · · Score: 1

    Fine, they can make plastic out of water, way cool! I'll give em that. But why, oh why can't they upload a decent photo :S

    --
    Be yourself and aim high!
  32. Right by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    because it's made of water, poses no harm to people

          Yeah. Forget about the clay and OTHER ORGANIC MOLECULES, it's got water so it has to be safe, right? People can be allergic to iron or zinc, let alone complex molecules.

          Sea water is made of "water" too. Try injecting some in your veins.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  33. you mean a goo girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean a goo girl ? warning, NSFW

  34. I want my transparent aluminum! by zish · · Score: 1

    I don't care how crappy the movie was!

    --
    Spork.

    P.S. Spork.
    1. Re:I want my transparent aluminum! by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      Here you go.

      Welcome to 2004.

      There was even a slashdot discussion of the article.

  35. Another Great Product That Won't Make It by Codename+Dutchess · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This will never replace oil based plastics. All you need to do is look at how hemp isn't replacing wood products, paper, clothing, etc. There are too few people with too much money running the oil industry. If they don't want your little water-plastics taking over the market, then it won't be. Simple as that.

  36. lies lies and damned lies by plague911 · · Score: 1

    "because it's made of water, poses no harm to people"" tell that to any one who has been hit by a large wave.. or a hurricane or a typhoon or been hit by another human being.

  37. Ice-nine ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One step closer to ice-nine.

  38. Thank you, and Baen Books! by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    And you made me remember: Polywater Doodle!

    Leave it Baen Books to put some of my childhood back up on the web for free. Anyway, their DRM-free marketing strategy works for me, I've never bought any ebooks anywhere else!

  39. APK, are you an asshat? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Yes? Then, stfu. I did even post data to back up my statement.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  40. Where is the recipe or the journal article? by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    Could anyone find the link to the Nature article or any other scientific literature on this material? I couldn't find it in the current issue of Nature.

  41. This is not new--or even recent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not new, nor is it even recent--you could buy this as a novelty (and a very nasty prank item) some fifteen years ago. You simply take five to ten pounds of the powder stuff, scatter it in somebody's living room, and then add water, with a hose. It is a damn HARD cleanup, as it forms "ice-cubes" up to waist deep. Another vandal use for it is dump ten-twenty pounds into swimming pools, or ornamental ponds/fountains--but try it yourself!

  42. high strength by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    how strong is it, and by what measure? I see it flexes in that person's hand so it's certainly not rigid. tensile strength? sheer strength? There's no way to tell what may or may not be done with the substance without more information.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  43. Is it biodegradable? by wrencherd · · Score: 1

    The most important thing about any replacement for our current plastics, I would think, would be that it be biodegradable, no?

    TFA doesn't seem to say one way or another though.

  44. oh boy! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

    After learning that metal, plastic, and ceramics weren't safe to drink out of, I thought I was smart getting a mould of a mug and freezing up an ice mug in the freezer. Now that you can use water to hold water without it melting, I just feel silly lol.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  45. Stimutacs! by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    That's about as reassuring as saying "This 95% water and 5% deadly deadly poison solution will be completely safe to inject directly into your bloodstream, since it is made completely out of water!"

    Yeah just like those Stimutacs I got from some guy who never gets out of his chair. He said they're safe because they are made from, like, 99% kelp. He works in a very advanced underwater research center called Sealab so he should know!

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  46. Anyone else notice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Medigel anyone?

  47. "Poses no harm"?!?! by izomiac · · Score: 1

    As is, the all-natural substance is perfect for medical procedures, because it's made of water, poses no harm to people, and is perfect for mending tissue.

    Seriously?

    • Basically everything biological is mostly water, but not everything biological is harmless
    • "All-natural", well obviously it's safe then. It's not like there's any substance in nature the least bit dangerous.
    • Icicles are essentially 100% water, yet they kill people all the time. Realistically, any solid could cause an embolism which can easily cause a PE, MI, or stroke (all very bad things).
    • It takes a single immunogenic or thrombogenic ingredient or combination of ingredients to make this substance useless for medical procedures. It turns out, our body is quite good at attacking stuff that doesn't belong there, so very few substances can be used for such purposes.
  48. Re:Yes figures: You're no chemist, Mr wanna be exp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a terrible troll, just awful. you have to post something at least half way interesting if you want people to reply.