Reread that: If you’re right, if people stop wearing shoes because something is transporting them around, who’s going to design/build/maintain/profit from those transporters? New Nike? Who’s going to do the same for the mini aircraft, New Boeing? If you think new environments/techs are going to displace the old and so this is a worthless exercise, you missed the point.
Together with previous rumors of Z running for President, I think we can see what is going on here and where this is going. He's doing research on ordinary folk in preparation for, well, we'll see.
The readily available components for this - a one-dose vial of epinephrine and an appropriate syringe - costs less than $10, less than $5 if you shop around. People are reluctant to use those because it's more complex and cumbersome than an epipen, but they should. Especially backup doses. And items like this the USA should just declare eminent domain and manufacture/distribute them at cost. This goes for any patented medicine not made available in sufficient quantity and at cost with not more than reasonable profit.
And we're left to wonder if they can't tell the difference between DDOS or a peak load, or if they'll decide to call "DDOS" on any peak load they're politically against.
Yesterday, in a medical conference, I was told that 75% of heroin addicts that started with oxycontin abuse never had a prescription for their oxycontin. Different statistic, but also very different implication. And no I don't have a source to cite, sorry, but I do believe in the sincerity of the speaker, FWIW.
I've always considered fundraising an admission that you're not there yet. With every round. And it's a necessary evil and a welcome leg-up when you need it, but you're begging for help and diluting the value of your project because you need it because you're not there yet.
I'd like to see those questions and responses, because 32% of all the adults I know find it hard to just get online - they wouldn't even try to download pirated content. Given this "statistic" was created by a group that would benefit from the a wildly inflated perception of the quantity of piracy, I'll take it with a grain of salt. And by the way, only 69% of people know that piracy is illegal? Do they even understand the definition of piracy?
"...homeless people and poor children who will never have any influence in the world..."
Wow. Check your bias at the door please - not having money or a home says nothing about your intelligence, capability, or desire to do good. I mean, look at our 5th avenue hillbilly president, offering an example of the opposite. Actually I can't tell if you're tongue-in-cheek or serious.
Hardening solar panels to withstand the wear of vehicles on them is fine for research, but you gotta believe there are other no-impact places to put them that would reduce the cost and win an argument for preference unequivocally when planning a big deployment. But maybe the French have money to burn (!) on infrastructure, while we're buried in tax cuts and war materiel.
Uber is all about bypassing and ignoring regulations and laws in the name of profit. I hope San Francisco can find a way to ensure they follow the rules, and prosecute them fully when they don't.
IOT attacks, that this discussion is addressing, are possible because millions of attached devices exist that aren't designed to be managed yet are capable of being hijacked. If it's possible to design IEEE-level standards into these devices that prevent the hijack, and legislation mandates that those standards must be present in any device sold in the USA, then those standards will proliferate. Malware authors will have many fewer targets on which to base DOS attacks. They will still break the rules, but they'll have far fewer targets with which to break the rules in this way. That's the idea, and it's a worthy idea to pursue.
Anything generating large amounts of high-energy neutrons is going to be a pain in the ass to keep clean and non-toxic. And, while research is always its own reward, any energy source that's also a neutron source should be put on the shelf until/if we max out renewables.
Slashdot Mirror
... no one can see your blue screen.
Reread that: If you’re right, if people stop wearing shoes because something is transporting them around, who’s going to design/build/maintain/profit from those transporters? New Nike?
Who’s going to do the same for the mini aircraft, New Boeing?
If you think new environments/techs are going to displace the old and so this is a worthless exercise, you missed the point.
Why isn't this illegal in every state? Maybe the story and the issue was targeted only to Washington State voters.
"When asked if it's a robot, a robot will always admit to you that it's a robot, or through inaction allow you to figure out it's a robot."
Together with previous rumors of Z running for President, I think we can see what is going on here and where this is going. He's doing research on ordinary folk in preparation for, well, we'll see.
The readily available components for this - a one-dose vial of epinephrine and an appropriate syringe - costs less than $10, less than $5 if you shop around. People are reluctant to use those because it's more complex and cumbersome than an epipen, but they should. Especially backup doses.
And items like this the USA should just declare eminent domain and manufacture/distribute them at cost. This goes for any patented medicine not made available in sufficient quantity and at cost with not more than reasonable profit.
The bible says a hack for a hack makes the whole world go blue screen.
We're proving that ignorance, greed, and bias doesn't scale.
And we're left to wonder if they can't tell the difference between DDOS or a peak load, or if they'll decide to call "DDOS" on any peak load they're politically against.
"I love my job."
Yesterday, in a medical conference, I was told that 75% of heroin addicts that started with oxycontin abuse never had a prescription for their oxycontin.
Different statistic, but also very different implication. And no I don't have a source to cite, sorry, but I do believe in the sincerity of the speaker, FWIW.
I needed a good push to stay away from Facebook. Avoiding instant noise is definitely that push.
I've always considered fundraising an admission that you're not there yet. With every round.
And it's a necessary evil and a welcome leg-up when you need it, but you're begging for help and diluting the value of your project because you need it because you're not there yet.
Do they come with free data plans, or do you have to pay for the 24x7 surveillance they provide?
Why can't it walk on it's "hands"?
"Extreme vetting" means something else entirely.
Before the robots are developed, we can use this to print our own tattoos at home.
Bye-bye ink shops - another skilled job lost to automation.
I'd like to see those questions and responses, because 32% of all the adults I know find it hard to just get online - they wouldn't even try to download pirated content. Given this "statistic" was created by a group that would benefit from the a wildly inflated perception of the quantity of piracy, I'll take it with a grain of salt.
And by the way, only 69% of people know that piracy is illegal? Do they even understand the definition of piracy?
"...homeless people and poor children who will never have any influence in the world ..."
Wow. Check your bias at the door please - not having money or a home says nothing about your intelligence, capability, or desire to do good. I mean, look at our 5th avenue hillbilly president, offering an example of the opposite.
Actually I can't tell if you're tongue-in-cheek or serious.
Paul Revere already sent a message using, potentially, one "unit of light": one if by land.
And he most probably wasn't the first.
Hardening solar panels to withstand the wear of vehicles on them is fine for research, but you gotta believe there are other no-impact places to put them that would reduce the cost and win an argument for preference unequivocally when planning a big deployment. But maybe the French have money to burn (!) on infrastructure, while we're buried in tax cuts and war materiel.
Uber is all about bypassing and ignoring regulations and laws in the name of profit. I hope San Francisco can find a way to ensure they follow the rules, and prosecute them fully when they don't.
IOT attacks, that this discussion is addressing, are possible because millions of attached devices exist that aren't designed to be managed yet are capable of being hijacked. If it's possible to design IEEE-level standards into these devices that prevent the hijack, and legislation mandates that those standards must be present in any device sold in the USA, then those standards will proliferate. Malware authors will have many fewer targets on which to base DOS attacks. They will still break the rules, but they'll have far fewer targets with which to break the rules in this way. That's the idea, and it's a worthy idea to pursue.
Anything generating large amounts of high-energy neutrons is going to be a pain in the ass to keep clean and non-toxic. And, while research is always its own reward, any energy source that's also a neutron source should be put on the shelf until/if we max out renewables.
All your drives are scanned for free. The subscription service allows you to request a restore.