Slashdot Mirror


Beaver Dam Visible From Space

ygslash writes "The Hoover Dam no longer holds the title of the world's widest dam. Satellite photos of northern Alberta, Canada, show that several families of beavers have apparently joined forces to build a dam 850 meters wide, more than twice as wide as the Hoover Dam."

12 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. I like beavers by SoupGuru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Putting aside the obvious jokes for a second, I always liked the fact that beavers are like humans because they modify their environment to suit their needs like we do.

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    1. Re:I like beavers by Supurcell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not like they're the only ones either. Birds, ants, spiders, gofers, and a whole lot more build structures to live more comfortably in. Humans need to stop thinking they are so special.

    2. Re:I like beavers by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Humans are special.

      We make steel, make building from concrete and glass. We've been to the moon and sent device outside our solars system.

      We can build damns, can beavers build space ships?

      Human beings kick ass.

      Although the original poster was being a little slow in the head. I mean, ALL creatures modify their environment. You have to in order to reproduce and eat.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:I like beavers by capebretonsux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no other species on earth quite like any other species on earth, period.

  2. Unaided? by Itninja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article doesn't say, but is this the unaided eye (e.g. a guy in he space shuttle could look out the window and see it)? Because I could see my house from modern satellite pictures.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  3. FOX news? by Karganeth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On my slashdot? It's more likely than you think!

  4. Re:Was the Hoover Dam EVER the widest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No, the original article was in The Sun (UK), the Fox article even links to it.

    And Slashdot still sucks for being third in a chain of reposts by staff that apparently only does an absolute minimum of fact checking.

  5. They really are the only ones. by mosb1000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The difference is that beavers don't just build a home, they also make radical changes to their natural environment which puts them in an entirely different class. It's comparable to the way we build dams for flood control (except . . the other way around) or plant crops to grow food. The changes they make expand their habitat rather than simply providing shelter.

  6. Seriously by skam240 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously everybody, nature's fucking awesome.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  7. Re:Bigger is Better by TaggartAleslayer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not sure if you were going for ironic or just stupid, but you hit both, so kudos.

  8. Re:850 meters??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Leave this one to the Chinese. The Three Gorges Dam is almost thrice as long, 2335 meters.

    Yeah, but was it built by beavers?

    /Proud Canadian

  9. Re:Was the Hoover Dam EVER the widest? by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The common factor is that it's all Murdoch media- Fox, The Sun, The New York Post etc.

    Yes, it's scary as fuck that the most succesful news corporation world wide is the one that's most full of shit globally.

    Hell, they even look possibly set to be getting their own way and putting David Cameron into power in the UK today, fingers crossed things don't quite go entirely Rupert's way and we get a hung parliament now.

    News Corporation papers are unfortunately responsible for more than just getting beaver stories wrong. Honestly, the best thing that could happen to the Western world would be the bankruptcy of Murdoch and the fall of all his papers etc. Him getting hit by a large truck would be nice too, because ultimately his love of spreading bullshit is responsible for more misery and problems globally through the spread of lies, ignorance, and bad government than some of the worlds worst dictators in history. If you look at the influence Fox had on getting Bush elected for example (even if you don't believe Fox's call was what gave him the election, all pre-election slandering of opposition makes a differences) then you can really link him to the fact the US went into Iraq in the first place even though it had nothing to do with 9/11. The actions of his news outlets have real, serious, knock on effects that can set off chains of events that cause tens, possibly hundreds of thousands to die.

    Of course, Murdoch isn't unique, others are as bad, he's just the king of evil in this respect. It's quite sad really. What makes it worse is that his offspring are just as bad and are taking over the reigns from him, so it's not as if we'll get rid of him that way either.