Slashdot Mirror


First Non-Latin TLDs Go Online Today

eldavojohn writes "ICANN today switched on the country code top level domains for Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, which are the first non-Latin TLDs available and are also fully readable right to left. Slashdot does not support them but you can find the TLDs in the BBC article. ICANN said it had 21 more requests for TLDs in 11 different languages. A quick note — if you do not have the language packs installed, you may experience unpredictable browser behavior in the URL bar. Right now countries like China and Thailand have implemented workarounds to achieve the same effect."

25 of 302 comments (clear)

  1. Thats all good by Johnny+Fusion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But they will still need Latin characters to type "http://"

    --
    There are two kinds of fool. One says, This is old, and therefore good. And one says, This is new, and therefore better.
    1. Re:Thats all good by HiVizDiver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't you mean HTTPVS/URLVS?

  2. Non-latin TLDs? by kvezach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, hooray for a more fragmented Internet. While every keyboard can type A-Za-z, that's not true of Chinese or Arabic, so sites using those TLDs will be effectively off-limits to those that aren't "native". Sure, the sites can also register an ordinary domain name, but then why not just use that domain name to begin with?

    1. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone with a Western Keyboard can type A-Z and a-z. Not so with other countries keyboards. (btw, you can still type the unicode characters in windows, its just much more difficult). But really, if they have a Chinese language URL, and a site that is entirely written in Chinese, are they worried about not having you as a potential customer, when you can't figure out how to connect using their language?

      There are more people online in China than live in the US. This is going to be awesome for their local online economies, as people will be able to use their native languages.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    2. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this a boon for russian scamers.

      some letters in russian cyrillic look like latin characters but have different uses. example, the cyrillic character that looks like a "C", is actually aquivalent to "S", their "H" is actually our "N". so a TLD ".som" in cyrillic would be seen on the screen (and understood by westerners) as ".com".

      so here's my suggestion to firefox developers: put some easy to see visual clue on the address bar to tell exactly in which language or character set the URL is written in.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
  3. Seriously? by elewton · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is it chauvinistic that I find this insane?

    I wouldn't mind if they used an escape character sequence and then mapped other alphabets to strings of Latin characters, but actually breaking backwards compatibility...

    1. Re:Seriously? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh C'mon! Jesus used the Aramaic alphabet.

      Shakespeare wrote in a "diffyrente waye", with an alphabet that included letters like the "thorne" - a "th" that is frequently mistaken for a "y" - hence our ridiculous "Ye Olde".

      As for Homer Simpson? I don't believe he can write very much at all.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    2. Re:Seriously? by bradleyjg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jesus spoke Aramaic (AFAWK didn't write at all) and his followers recorded his life in Koine Greek. Neither of which can be represented in ISO 8859-1.

  4. Fragmenting and such... by Unka+Willbur · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ridiculous tribalism, that's all it is. Fragmentation of the Internet to appease some regressive, regional e-peenery is the stupidest idea to date. I speak 8 languages and love some, like Russian immensely, but the internet is a nation with its own language, and that language is Standard English. I call shenanigans on anything else being shoehorned into its basic infrastructure!

    --
    "Remember when I said I would never lie? Well, that was the first time."
    1. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      English? WTF? LOL!

    2. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When the 7 Billion people around the globe will be speaking Standard English, then you may have a point. Until then I think it is everybody's right to use his/her native/preferred language on the Internet, including in TLDs. I speak 5 languages and Arabic is my native language and I think that today is a great day for the Internet.

    3. Re:Fragmenting and such... by melikamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but the internet is a nation with its own language

      Yeah, but it's not English, it's TCP/IP. And DNS is not even an integral part of the Internet, but rather a layer on top, used mostly for the WWW part. Many peer-to-peer applications would work just fine even if DNS was never created.

    4. Re:Fragmenting and such... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ridiculous tribalism, that's all it is.

      Well, then as the submitter, I regret tagging it with "culture."

      I speak 8 languages and love some, like Russian immensely, but the internet is a nation with its own language, and that language is Standard English. I call shenanigans on anything else being shoehorned into its basic infrastructure!

      Huh, as a developer I had always assumed that we wrote software to help people. Not that people changed their behaviors and customs to be able to use our software. I guess I was wrong. I find it disturbing that a polyglot like yourself can so easily dismiss an engineering challenge as "ridiculous" and "shenanigans" because all it takes to get around it is for everyone in the world to learn my language of takes.

      I find it humorous that we sit here and rail for interoperability and satisfying the consumer and no DRM and open standards ... only to turn around and call something that opens up the internet to the rest of the world "ridiculous."

      If this is the consensus among geeks, what a shame it is to be a geek.

      Where do you stand on the effort that went into the Linux language packs? Were those ridiculous tribalism as well when someone took the time to make them?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    5. Re:Fragmenting and such... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a UI problem, and it's pretty easy to fix. Simply display punycode URLs in a different colour, such as red. Some browsers do this already. Punycode isn't new; it's been supported for second-level domains for a long time. The only new thing here is that some ccTLDs are now using Punycode for the top-level part as well as the subdomains.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Fragmenting and such... by jmv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ridiculous tribalism, that's all it is. Fragmentation of the Internet to appease some regressive, regional e-peenery is the stupidest idea to date.

      Maybe if DNS addresses were based on Chinese, Hindi or Arabic then you'd have a different opinion.

  5. This is just like .xxx by drumcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Guess what -- this will all get blocked. More fragmentation = less free internet. Here comes Sharia law that says all internet usage must be in Farsi, and all websites with latin endings will be blocked. Weak.

    1. Re:This is just like .xxx by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Guess what -- this will all get blocked. More fragmentation = less free internet. Here comes Sharia law that says all internet usage must be in Farsi, and all websites with latin endings will be blocked. Weak.

      No, the sharia will be that all internet usage must be in Arabic since that is the only language the Koran can be in (if it isn't in Arabic, it isn't the Koran according to Muslims).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  6. you're not thinking the issue through by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    currently people are not getting on the internet because its all in english: it serves as a barrier and they see no reason to even try

    but when the internet supports their native language, they get on the internet, get a taste of it, like it, want to use more it, and inevitably this drives them to the english web, since there's more of whatever they're looking for over there

    in other words, the long term effect of supporting other languages on the web is paradoxically further and faster consolidation to english

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you're not thinking the issue through by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not necessarily.

      Since sometime back in the '90s the web site www.ilse.nl was founded: a search engine that would index Dutch language sites only. Very useful for those that speak Dutch. Luckily for us Dutch we don't need a different character set, we can get along with the limits of Latin just fine. When it came to searching for Dutch language sites it was the number one choice. And so there are a few more, www.startpagina.nl is another very popular one.

      Wikipedia comes in lots of languages - but I have never heard anyone here shout "fragmentation! Less freedom!" about that. Even though most of those other languages are inaccessible to them. But then English is inaccessible for a large part of the world, and the vast majority of people still prefers to use their native language. And that preference continues online. Even though they may be proficient in English.

      I can actually imagine that the English language in the long term becomes a minority language. After all there are more native Chinese speakers than native English speakers in this world. There are probably even more non-English speakers than that there are English speakers, and in this case not even talking about native English speakers.

  7. Good first step! by fortapocalypse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now to axe the latin protocol prefix, colon, slashes and dots. Also, what about those with disabilities- it is visual after all. We need "thought domains"- but wait, what about those with impaired mental capacities? Domains by intuitition would work. But what about parallel universes! Argh.

    1. Re:Good first step! by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when does a user have to type the http:/// in a browser bar?

  8. Re:Really? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't wait to register mohammed.com in arabic and redirect it to goatse!

    You realize that now every Anonymous Coward is a target, right?

    Thanks a lot.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  9. Re:Really? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just for anybody who is interested and lazy... javascript:alert(unescape("http://www.bankofam%u212ercia.com"))

    It doesn't look exactly like 'e', but it's certainly close enough to fool some people.

  10. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    TFS said Slashdot doesn't support those URLs. That doesn't mean the rest of the internet can't.

  11. Re:Really? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do that to ebay.com paypal.com, etc.... It opens up a world of unholy hell for all the scammers on this planet to make it even harder to determine if a site is real or fake....

    Thanks ICANN!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.