Slashdot Mirror


Lower Merion School's Report Says IT Dept. Did It, But Didn't Inhale

PSandusky writes "A report issued by the Lower Merion School District's chosen law firm blames the district's IT department for the laptop webcam spying scandal. In particular, the report mentions lax IT policies and record-keeping as major problems that enabled the spying. Despite thousands of e-mails and images to the contrary, the report also maintains that no proof exists that anyone in IT viewed images captured by the webcams."

3 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Wow... by Zerth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Especially considering the email that said they thought it was like watching "a little LMSD soap opera,". While the statement could have been taken out of context("testing this is cool, this is like 'a little LMSD soap opera'"), it kind of implies they looked at something.

  2. As expected by wisnoskij · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is the minions fault, of course no one in management would ever do anything amoral.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  3. Re:So how did they see the kid eating candy? by zeroduck · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is what I've heard (source):

    The report says Robbins turned in his laptop with a broken screen and was issued a loaner on Oct. 20, but school officials quickly moved to retrieve it due to outstanding insurance fees. So the tracking program was activated from Oct. 20 to Nov. 4 and captured 210 webcam photographs and 218 screen shots, the report said.

    So they knew who had the laptop (not missing). They gave it to him (not stolen). They didn't attempt to recover the laptop by using reasonable measures (asking him for it back, calling the parents). But some how, spying on him for 15 days, off campus, is reasonable for not paying a $50 fee?