Slashdot Mirror


Games Workshop Sues Warhammer Online Fansite

chalkyj writes "WarhammerAlliance.com (run for the last five years as one of the leading fansites for the MMORPG Warhammer Online) is being sued by Games Workshop for the use of the 'Warhammer' name, 'cybersquatting' and 'unfair competition.' This lawsuit is yet another in Games Workshop's disturbing pattern of suing their fans and hobbyists, this time going after a legitimate fansite for their MMORPG franchise. The full complaint (PDF) has been posted online."

7 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Way to kill your business by sourcerror · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't imagine anything worse for their PR. No amount of advertisement can fix that.

    1. Re:Way to kill your business by hibiki_r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They took down a bunch of stuff from BoardGameGeek too: They are doing their best to commit PR Suicide.

  2. Questionable claims by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Two points:

    1. It's not cybersquatting when the domain name is used for legitimate purposes.
    2. I don't know about trademark law, but a non-legal, average person interpretation of the term "unfair competition" suggests that you'd have to be competing against the trademark holder rather than expressing support for their product.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  3. Re:Trademark is a tricky thing by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    there is also no reason to defend your copyright against someone who is encouraging others to buy and use your copyrighted product.

    There are a lot of stupid copyright suits, but these type are the ones that absolutely astonish me the most. They aren't suing someone who makes them lose money or even a use that does nothing for the bottom line, they are suing people that are helping them make money by giving out free positive promotion and rallying their customer base. They ought to be sending them a thank you a "Warhammer approved!" website badge. When companies that I patronize do this it makes me reconsider being their customer in the future... especially when it's a "want" product like a game rather than a need.

  4. Re:Damm lawyers by bconway · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your subject shares nothing with your post. Lawyers didn't decide to a sue a Warhammer fan site.

    --
    Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
  5. Re:Trademark is a tricky thing by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    there is also no reason to defend your copyright against someone who is encouraging others to buy and use your copyrighted product.

    You just jumped from trademark to copyright; two sometimes related but entirely different things.

  6. Re:Damm lawyers by Jer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Somehow, I doubt that Games Workshop's shitty attitude towards their customers just comes from their legal department. The guys at the top at least have to sign off on it - if they aren't the ones who are pushing the policy in the first place.

    Lawyers are rarely the ultimate cause of problems from corporations. They're usually enablers, not decision makers. They get more credit than they deserve for bad decisions because part of their job is to be the designated asshole for a company, but the decisions come from the top at any company that isn't completely dysfunctional. (And in companies that are completely dysfunctional the decisions come from HR anyway, not from legal.)