Is the 4th Yellow Pixel of Sharp Quattron Hype?
Nom du Keyboard writes "Sharp Aquos brand televisions are making a big deal about their Quattron technology of adding a 4th yellow pixel to their RGB sets. While you can read a glowing review of it here, the engineer in me is skeptical because of how all the source material for this set is produced in 3-color RGB. I also know how just making a picture brighter and saturating the colors a bit can make it more appealing to many viewers over a more accurate rendition – so much for side-by-side comparisons. And I laugh at how you are supposed to see the advantages of 4-color technology in ads on your 3-color sets at home as you watch their commercials. It sounds more like hype to extract a higher profit margin than the next great advance in home television. So is it real?"
No.
Don't make me say it a third time.
No link.
The "refresh rate" is set by the flourescent light in your back panel - not the lcd crystal shutters. Just like the "LED TV" is just an LCD tv with an LED for a backlight instead of one or more flourescent lights. That's why they all end up looking like crap in comparison to a plasma - where each pixel is made up of 3 separate emitters, no backlight, no diffusion panel, no light bleed when you stand near it and look down (or at too great an angle on the horizontal axis), and inherent reduced motion blur because the image is strobed, same as a crt
Spend the few bucks more and buy a plasma. You won't get the "soap opera effect", and you'll have a rock-steady picture.