Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Bug Lets Users Force Others To Follow Them

Several readers have sent word of a Twitter bug which has been allowing users to make any other user follow them by simply tweeting "accept [username]." People have been abusing it to make the accounts of various celebrities and publications follow them. Twitter acknowledged the bug and disabled the follow/unfollow system until they can get it fixed.

143 comments

  1. Bug fixed by PeekabooCaribou · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    "I'll say it again for the logic-impaired." -- Larry Wall.
    1. Re:Bug fixed by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

      Twitter says they have resolved this bug.

      http://status.twitter.com/post/587210796/follow-bug-discovered-remedied

      It's not so much fixed as unreproducible by way of disabling the entire "follow" feature. The twits are in a panic, wondering if they've offended people since their followers have all disappeared.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Bug fixed by pitchpipe · · Score: 1, Funny

      Twitter Bug Lets Users Force Others To Follow Them

      Who could resist following someone who was doing the "TwitterBug"? It's such an irresistible dance!

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    3. Re:Bug fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter says they have resolved this bug. http://status.twitter.com/post/587210796/follow-bug-discovered-remedied

      I have an easy way to fix it: Cancel your Twitter account.

    4. Re:Bug fixed by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      It's not so much fixed as unreproducible by way of disabling the entire "follow" feature.

      Aaaaaaaaand now it looks fixed.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Bug fixed by raynet · · Score: 1

      Oh I wish that "cancel (username)" would work :)

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    6. Re:Bug fixed by Linker3000 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Good job little Bobby Tables is not using Twitter.

      http://xkcd.com/327/

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    7. Re:Bug fixed by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Good job little Bobby Tables is not using Twitter.

      http://xkcd.com/327/

      Or his mum.

  2. Fast by digitalmonkey2k1 · · Score: 1

    Looks like it's being fixed...

    --
    My sausage tree didn't grow, does that make me a bad mommy?
  3. That might explain Chavez's Top Twitterer Status by ZuchinniOne · · Score: 3, Funny
  4. Re:Solution... by PeekabooCaribou · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Slashdot has comments, friend/foe, and journal (blog) space. What's to prevent you from getting fired for using Slashdot?

    --
    "I'll say it again for the logic-impaired." -- Larry Wall.
  5. Probably not a bug by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider that selling a list of users and their preferred content information to advertisers could result in a huge profit for Twitter. Then imagine a captive audience forced to receive what is essentially spam tweets.

    This is definitely a feature, not a bug. And this disabling of the feature for the time being is a temporary measure to let the furor blow over before reactivating it later.

    Twitter isn't a public utility. It's a business just like Google and Microsoft. They will find a way to monetize your behaviors.

    So what should you do? Stop using Twitter?

    1. Re:Probably not a bug by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what should you do? Stop using Twitter?

      Yes.

    2. Re:Probably not a bug by janeuner · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So what should you do? Stop using Twitter?

      Yes.

    3. Re:Probably not a bug by fotbr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

    4. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what should you do? Stop using Twitter?

      Yes.

    5. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what should you do? Stop using Twitter?

      Yes.

    6. Re:Probably not a bug by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      So what should you do? Stop using Twitter?

      Not a bad solution, this link claims locking your twitter account would also work.

    7. Re:Probably not a bug by 517714 · · Score: 1

      Never start.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    8. Re:Probably not a bug by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

      That might not be allowed. If you don't sign up with these social networks, you will be flagged as a "loner" type , and put on the no fly list. Customs already does this to people who don't have a credit card. I speak from experience. So, what have you got to hide? Sign up already!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    9. Re:Probably not a bug by Dalambertian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The suggestion that we should stop using twitter because of spam is quite strange. Has spam stopped you from using email?

    10. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what should you do? Stop using Twitter?

      Please?

    11. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't make any sense. The bug is that you can sign people up to follow your tweets by simply forging the expected "ack" for what would normally be the "syn" on a protected account. This would allow the user to do things like unfollow or block unwanted twitter accounts that are used for advertisers.

      Twitter has already said that they are creating an advertising system that will insert ads into your twitter stream. These supposedly will be single ads, inserted at the top, similar to google's searches. These will not be advertiser streams that you will be signed up to receive: they will simply appear in your stream. You will have no recourse to stop following or ban the ads, as they are phantoms in the system. They behave nothing like the bug listed here.

      Making it a public call would be even more foolish, as advertisers would be able to use it without actually paying Twitter. They could just sign people up on their own. What would be the profit in that? Twitter needs to control access as the gatekeeper in order to make advertisers pay.

      And do you really think Twitter the company doesn't have in-house tools to add anyone to anything they want to? What would they need this hacky external method for?

      Think it through. This is a bug, pure and simple. Someone wrote the authentication for protected accounts a long time ago, and didn't put a lot of thought into it being a worldwide phenomenon. Yes, Twitter is going ad-supported. But this bug has nothing to do with that.

    12. Re:Probably not a bug by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Meant to post under this account name.

    13. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could just be a bug.

    14. Re:Probably not a bug by Jer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whether or not this would be useful for spam, it would be more profitable for Twitter to be able to control it, rather than letting individuals force other people to follow them. This is clearly a bug - there's no financial benefit to Twitter with this and if it went on for too long they'd lose users (which is probably why they shut off the follower mechanism as soon as the bug was publicized).

      Not to say Twitter couldn't introduce their own advertising scheme. Just that if they did they'd want it to be one they controlled - and took payments for - not one that random spammers could exploit for free.

    15. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would imply starting to use Twitter.

    16. Re:Probably not a bug by owlnation · · Score: 1

      "The suggestion that we should stop using twitter because of spam is quite strange. Has spam stopped you from using email?"

      Yes. Well, specifically, it has stopped me using Yahoo or Hotmail as an email provider.

      Twitter is perhaps a useful tool for a few people, but it's far from essential. There's plenty of alternative means of communication. There's no reason anyone "needs" twitter. I've never used it, and I can't imagine any situation where I would ever do so. It's simply a fad, nothing of value will be lost by anyone stopping using it.

    17. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's twitter?

    18. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      yes

    19. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

      Dangit. I just lost The Game. Problem is, as per Rule 1, you can't not play.

    20. Re:Probably not a bug by Dalambertian · · Score: 1

      Like many others here I use gmail to make spam negligible, and I'm sure enterprising people will do the same for twitter should spam become a real problem. Twitter's value comes in what you stand to gain by using it, not by what you think is currently necessary. Think about the effects of #cnnfail or Kevin Smith's Southwest Airlines incident. Compare the effects of a single subversive tweet to all the hundreds of letters you might write your congressman. But aside from its role in society, its personal value is in who you choose to communicate with, just as with email.

    21. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like trying to read slashdot by only reading slashdot.org/~[username]/comments

      You only get to see the comments of people whose usernames you know, you only get to see one person's comments at a time, and if you spend half a day you can almost put together most of a thread.

    22. Re:Probably not a bug by binarybum · · Score: 1

      that sounds awesome - sign me up!

        btw. this twitter thing is not on at the same time as reality tv is it? because i'd hate to miss that.

      --
      ôó
    23. Re:Probably not a bug by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      that sounds awesome - sign me up!

      I'll do that for you right now...

    24. Re:Probably not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are doing it wrong.

    25. Re:Probably not a bug by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > If you don't sign up with these social networks, you will be flagged
      > as a "loner" type , and put on the no fly list. Customs already does
      > this to people who don't have a credit card. I speak from experience.

      Huh. I've never had a credit card, and last I checked I didn't have any trouble at the airport. Granted, it's been five years since the last time I flew. But I didn't have any problem at that time.

      If I were paranoid, I'd probably think you were a credit-card industry shill spreading FUD to scare people into getting credit cards. But in reality I don't think they're bothering much about it at this point. They have pretty much the entire adult population in their crushing grip already and have, I think, become complacent about the rest of us. There must be at least a few hundred of us left in this country who have never given in and got a card, but at this point I think they're just ignoring us. Heck, they don't even bother to harass me with endless credit card offers in the mail any more. I used to get that junk every day, but at this point several *months* can pass between their "offers".

      First they wheedle and cajole, then they laugh at you, then they ignore you, then you win?

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    26. Re:Probably not a bug by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      As soon as Twitter is useful for sharing confidential business information, receiving bills and shipping information, having personal conversations with one other person or just a select group of people, and transferring attachments... then and only then can it be compared in any way to email.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    27. Re:Probably not a bug by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Think about the effects of #cnnfail or Kevin Smith's Southwest Airlines incident.

      The what? Who's Kevin Smith, and why do I care what happened between him and an airline I avoid like the plague?

      Twitter still isn't important.

    28. Re:Probably not a bug by geekboy642 · · Score: 1

      If you share confidential business information over unencrypted email, you might as well just be posting it on twitter.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    29. Re:Probably not a bug by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Absolutely right. Which is just another feature of email--the fact you have the option of encryption--that sets it so far apart from Twitter, you can't possibly start comparing the two as the parent poster did.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    30. Re:Probably not a bug by Dalambertian · · Score: 1

      My point in the comparison is simply to illustrate that the benefits of twitter as a utility outweigh the costs of whatever spam that might get through, just as with email. Twitter does not need to duplicate the functionality of email for it to be genuinely useful to society.

    31. Re:Probably not a bug by Dalambertian · · Score: 1

      #cnnfail was the twitter hash tag used when CNN neglected to cover the Iranian protests last summer. It's what prompted CNN to include a twitter feed in their broadcasts. Kevin Smith is the writer/director of Dogma, Clerks, Chasing Amy and other counter-culture cult classics. He complained over twitter about getting kicked off a plane for being too fat. Southwest Airlines was forced to make a few public statements defending their policy. I mention these stories as examples of how twitter is helping shift the balance of power away from mainstream media and corporations and toward the public.

    32. Re:Probably not a bug by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, point taken. I find it an odd comparison, but I can see what you're getting at.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    33. Re:Probably not a bug by QuietObserver · · Score: 1

      More to the point, aren't most of us "loners" already? Besides, what's wrong with being a "loner" in the first place? And I agree with you about credit cards. I can't recall the last time I received a "you're preapproved" item either, though I have destroyed enough in my time. I believe we can say we have won.

    34. Re:Probably not a bug by QuietObserver · · Score: 1

      No, but it moved me to GMail, where I have far better control over spam. And I never used twitter in the first place, and only looked into this because the article name made me laugh.

  6. That sounds more like a by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    test command embedded into the code that allows "dummy" testing within the development environment. Either way - oops.

    --
    L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
    1. Re:That sounds more like a by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm going to stick my neck out and suggest it's more a case of someone deciding not to check for errors in a bit of code.

      In Twitter, you can have either protected tweets or unprotected tweets. If the former, then if someone wants to follow you, they have to request it, and you can either "accept" them following or deny it.

      It looks to me that the commands are sent in-band, and that the command "accept " is related to the above code. What isn't happening is any check that the person identified ever actually sent a request in the first place.

      So, this isn't an evil conspiracy to send people advertising (was BAG being serious?), and I doubt it's test code either. The above just "fits" with everything we know about twitter.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:That sounds more like a by AndrewNeo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They're likely sent in-band because most SMS commands are the same as the web interface. You can follow, direct message, etc. through both SMS or the update interface.

    3. Re:That sounds more like a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. It's likley just another security flaw that allows command injection into the twitter application. Along the lines of SQL injection, or interpeter code injection used when web programming was done using CGI

  7. Of course by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Justin Bieber is actually a secret computer hacker, breaking simple algorithms like this is cake for him.

    In fact, all of his music is about IRC.

    1. Re:Of course by Thelasko · · Score: 1, Funny

      From what I understand, this bug was discovered by someone who calls himself "Bobby Tables." However, there appears to be no records of such person in any school system computers.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re:Of course by i+ate+my+neighbour · · Score: 1

      Actually it is discovered by some anonymous guy in "inci sozluk" kind of Turkish equivalent of /b/

  8. So...? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    All your tweets are belong to us?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:So...? by Abstrackt · · Score: 5, Funny

      "In Soviet Russia, celebrities follow YOU!"?

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:So...? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more like "All our tweets are belong to all of you".

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:So...? by BSAtHome · · Score: 1

      All your tweets are belong to us?

      No, they belong to Bobby Tables.

    4. Re:So...? by ciaohound · · Score: 0

      ...
      5) Profit!?

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    5. Re:So...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in Soviet Russia...

  9. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if I try to tweet system("rm -rf /") ?

    1. Re:Cool! by sohp · · Score: 1

      Or better yet: ;DROP table users; --

  10. Does this work on Slashdot? by InvisibleSoul · · Score: 5, Funny

    accept +1 Funny

    1. Re:Does this work on Slashdot? by Yvan256 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Looks like it works, but let's try it with something else just to be sure.

      accept +5 MooCow

    2. Re:Does this work on Slashdot? by capo_dei_capi · · Score: 2, Funny

      This board does not have Super Cow Powers.

    3. Re:Does this work on Slashdot? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn, I went back to Tristram for nothing.

    4. Re:Does this work on Slashdot? by Idiomatick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I like that this was marked troll as if the mods were personally offended that someone dare suggest that /. doesn't have 'Super Cow Powers'.

    5. Re:Does this work on Slashdot? by capo_dei_capi · · Score: 0

      Yup, this is definitely the last time I doubt the omnipotence of /.
      Gonna get banned if I do it again, anyway.

    6. Re:Does this work on Slashdot? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Yup, works fine.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    7. Re:Does this work on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      replying AC to undo accidental overrated mod. Meant funny.

      Fucking stupid metamod system that doesn't let you confirm...

  11. and i thought people just hated me by alen · · Score: 1, Insightful

    looked up my twitter and i have 0 followers now

    1. Re:and i thought people just hated me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have the same number of followers.

    2. Re:and i thought people just hated me by Ackmo · · Score: 1, Funny

      0?

    3. Re:and i thought people just hated me by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Looks like the mods here hate you too since you're modded off-topic (even though your post is more on-topic than most posts :) ).

      Maybe you could try posting "accept +1 Insightful". It worked for some slashdotter earlier (who went for +1 Funny).

      --
  12. In-Band Signalling by captaindomon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is one of the difficulties of In-Band Signaling. Their communication channel is so limited that handling secure signaling is difficult.

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    1. Re:In-Band Signalling by Amouth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not exactly.. their failure was not implementing some type of request/accept queue system.. and if they did they bypassed it and gave the accept message the ability to add people even if they where not in the queue, which is just stupid.

      while i agree that In-Band Signaling is not easy to do right, and that they do have a limited communication channel.. they do not have a limited processing or back-end infrastructure..

      there is no excuse for this type of screwup..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:In-Band Signalling by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      it's not *that* difficult: you could have a simple UUID sent on follow requests that has to be returned in the accept/not accept response for example; the fact that twitter fixed this issue very quickly could mean that that this was indeed a testing command that was left in and that the user-initiated follow/unfollow works a bit more securely...

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    3. Re:In-Band Signalling by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      well, go ahead and accept me at my /. twittername and see if it works. I think they've disabled follow/unfollow requests for now

      Plus, I really wanna see if it shows up on both ends of the queue, or just the one end.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  13. Obligatory by Godai · · Score: 1

    TWITTER BEFORE ZOD!

    --
    Wood Shavings!
    - Godai
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, this wasn't obligatory at all. Epic fail.

  14. Blue Box by John+Whitley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Heh, it's tempting to view this as an accidental homage to the blue box.:

    An early phreaking tool, the blue box is an electronic device that simulates a telephone operator's dialing console. It functions by replicating the tones used to switch long-distance calls and using them to route the user's own call, bypassing the normal switching mechanism. The most typical use of a blue box was to place free telephone calls - inversely, the Black Box enabled one to receive calls which were free to the caller.

    For those new to the party, on early telephony networks the telco's control signals were sent on the same channel as the content (voice) signals. Some bright folks figured out how to exploit this weakness. Oops. ;-)

    1. Re:Blue Box by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting...

    2. Re:Blue Box by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      For those new to the party, on early telephony networks the telco's control signals were sent on the same channel as the content (voice) signals. Some bright folks figured out how to exploit this weakness. Oops. ;-)

      The main difference being that back in the blue boxing days, security was an afterthought and now it's a multi-billion dollar industry.

      Which only makes Twitter's glaring mistake all the more embarrassing.
      It's up there with Norton's "stopkeylogger" fiasco.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Blue Box by hitmark · · Score: 3, Informative

      yep, telcos operated on the "security by obscurity" system. Only their own personnel should in theory know the unlisted numbers to the switches and so on. But thanks to anything from grabbing manuals from the back of repair trucks, to wardailing whole area codes, this didnt work in the long run.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    4. Re:Blue Box by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Which only makes Twitter's glaring mistake all the more embarrassing.
      It's up there with Norton's

      Damn it! Why does your post keep crashing my browser? There's nothing after this...

    5. Re:Blue Box by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The main difference being that back in the blue boxing days, security was an afterthought and now it's a multi-billion dollar industry.

      It's a multi-billion dollar industry... that gets called in after-the-fact once a tool gets really popular.

  15. Woot this, Twitter! by macraig · · Score: 1

    I thought the Woot blog response to the matter was more interesting. I haven't been corrupted by Twitter yet, so it's all just amusing to me anyway.

  16. fix by karlzt · · Score: 0

    fixed!

  17. Re:That might explain Chavez's Top Twitterer Statu by nbates · · Score: 1

    You are kidding, right?

  18. fixed! by karlzt · · Score: 0
    1. Re:fixed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope! Just disabled. A little like you.

  19. Re:Solution... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

    1) Do not hire anybody using social networking sites.

    2) Make joining social networking sites a cause of immediate termination of employment.

    Are you kidding me? How on earth do you expect employers to spy on their employees without the employees handing out their personal lives on a sliver platter? Sure, everyone wants the "best and the brightest" employees ... but do you really need a Rhodes scholar to do your accounts payable paperwork? Or handle your returns department? Of course not. Employers use these sites to "safely" monitor their herd of employees without "going to far".

  20. Re:Solution... by ls671 · · Score: 1

    > Slashdot has comments, friend/foe, and journal (blog) space.
    > What's to prevent you from getting fired for using Slashdot?

    much less obvious when comes the time to link it to my identity. Not that it is impossible although ;-)

    I never told my Slashdot ID to anybody I know, I don't friend/foe anybody and I have no journal. Additionally, I try to be careful about what I post.

    When can I pass the interview ? ;-)

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  21. this only worked in Twitter's Web interface.. by tirnacopu · · Score: 2, Informative

    ..not on third-party apps?
    Twitter, meet WWW::Mechanize.
    WWW::Mechanize, meet a twat.

    1. Re:this only worked in Twitter's Web interface.. by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      It probably worked over SMS, too.

  22. Re:Solution... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

    > Slashdot has comments, friend/foe, and journal (blog) space. > What's to prevent you from getting fired for using Slashdot?

    much less obvious when comes the time to link it to my identity. Not that it is impossible although ;-)

    I never told my Slashdot ID to anybody I know, I don't friend/foe anybody and I have no journal. Additionally, I try to be careful about what I post.

    When can I pass the interview ? ;-)

    When you work for a company I'm pretty sure they know your identity. I think it's also safe to assume they don't care what your /. ID is, just that you're wasting company time.

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  23. it's all fun and games by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    until you realize that as twitter creeps further into english language use, the following conversation following english language convention is only a few months away:

    "i was going to twitter that until i got the tweet you twatted yesterday and i realized its no fun twuttering anymore, you twat"

    "don't call me a twat you twit"

    (shudder)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:it's all fun and games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      saying twat in the context of twitter was funny for like the first 5 minutes of twitter existing

    2. Re:it's all fun and games by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Acting grown up is easier when you like, use correct capitalisation, punctuation and like, don't use the word "like" like that.

    3. Re:it's all fun and games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not a criticism of perceived maturity, just saying stale joke is stale

  24. Testing by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Funny

    modfunny 318230

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Testing by ahow628 · · Score: 1

      I could definitely see "unaccept (username)" coming in really handy over here at /.

    2. Re:Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're doing it wrong ... it would be modfunny 32159358

      (But then you didn't know your mid when you posted, did you?

    3. Re:Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it works! quick freeze the mod system, it's got the same bug as Twitter!

    4. Re:Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      accept cowboyneal ... feels more like a religious statement...

  25. Re:Solution... by ls671 · · Score: 1

    Sorry I posted on the wrong topic, I had a FA linking to a topic about social networking sites and jobs in "sensible activity fields" on my /. front page and it doesn't seem to be there anymore ;-))

    It might be a /. bug, I can`t explain it ;-(

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  26. Conan saw it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    http://twitter.com/ConanOBrien/status/13631062967

  27. Re:Solution... by ls671 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry I posted on the wrong topic, I had a FA linking to a topic about social networking sites and jobs in "sensible activity fields" on my /. front page and it doesn't seem to be there anymore ;-))

    Here is the link I posted to, it apparently has been rescheduled from 1:27 PM to 3:09 PM eastern time. So it seems like a /. problem.

    http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/05/10/1652245/Businesses-Struggle-To-Control-Social-Networking?art_pos=1

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  28. Re:Solution... by ls671 · · Score: 1

    > just that you're wasting company time.

    Some people are paid by their company to read /.

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  29. Why do Web 2.0 sites have so much trouble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it with the so-called Web 2.0 sites that makes them so much more prone to cock-ups like this?

    If they aren't suffering from a security flaw like this one, they're suffering from horrible performance problems.

    Take Reddit, for instance. They put it in read-only mode for many hours last week after users had their posting histories go missing and other problems arose.

    It's not like these sites are getting that much traffic. Digg and Reddit aren't even in Alexa's Top 100 sites. There are many other sites out there that get just as much, if not more, traffic, yet their performance is just fine.

    Maybe it has something to do with these sites using NoSQL? They've flat out rejected 40 years of accumulated database knowledge and experience in favor of messing around with network-aware hash tables. Maybe it's no surprise that they have so many problems, when they intentionally avoid best practices.

    1. Re:Why do Web 2.0 sites have so much trouble? by dskzero · · Score: 1

      I'd guess it's because there are more users more likely to stick their mouse pointers where they are not supposed to.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
  30. myspace? by WndrBr3d · · Score: 1

    ... but most of all, samy is my hero.

  31. It's twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's twitter. Did you really think it takes that great of an actual programmer to write that site? I mean they did decide to make a massive site using Ruby on Rails and then write their own message queue in Ruby, ignoring the 100000 existing queues that were better in Ruby and other languages. Is anyone shocked that they can't implement basic logic and security properly?

  32. Re:Solution... by drachenstern · · Score: 1

    And yet some of us have been using slashdot for as long as we've been on the web (roughly so ~ more or less) as younger folks know it today.

    I've been using this nick since 95 ish and haven't hidden that fact as far as I can remember. It was only lately that I even got an email addy that matched my real name (and that only for job hunt purposes). So I guess the fact that you don't share your username outside /. is related to the fact that you only got on the internets a couple years ago?

    Also, who the f*ck cares? It's /.. We're supposed to be crackpots. Why be careful about what you post?

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
  33. Recursive twittering by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone abused this to follow themselves? That has much more fun potential than pretending random strangers care about your tweets.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    1. Re:Recursive twittering by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      I would agree, but the only people following me are random strangers - possibly because I signed up for Twitter, sent one tweet as a test, and haven't been back again. I just don't see the point if you aren't a celebrity who wants to get more publicity.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    2. Re:Recursive twittering by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      Infinite loop! Let's try that out... out... out... out... out... ....

    3. Re:Recursive twittering by cgenman · · Score: 1

      If you have a large group of friends and associates, it's a nice way to let each other know of goings-on. Things like BBQ's, beach outings, cocktail nights, etc.

      If people you know aren't using it, then it is exceedingly useless.

    4. Re:Recursive twittering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a real cocktail, fruit!

    5. Re:Recursive twittering by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 2, Funny

      And so dawns the age of the auto-lobotic circle-tweet.

  34. I know someone tried this already, but,,, by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    friend VGPowerlord

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  35. Re:Solution... by silanea · · Score: 1

    Too bad there is no -1 Making me envious moderation.

    --
    Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
  36. Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I never thought I would see one of these soviet russia things where it was actually accurate and relevant.

    1. Re:Holy crap! by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      I never thought I would see one of these soviet russia things where it was actually accurate and relevant.

      Why, thank you. Let me add you as a follower on twitter. ;)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  37. Don't be silly by Snaller · · Score: 1

    "So what should you do? Stop using Twitter?"

    Exactly. They'd loose 90% of their users like that if it they started doing that.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Don't be silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. They'd loose 90% of their users like that if it they started doing that.

      They'd turn 90% of their users loose? Good heavens! Can you imagine 90% of Twitter's users, loose in the wild, making hideously abbreviated statements and acting like they're important because a bunch of other abbreviated-minded people follow them? It'd be an unprecedented disaster! It'd be as if all the braindead SMS texters suddenly started talking exactly like they text, in the real world!

      We have to stop it from happening! Twitter can't LOSE * a single user over this!

      *: You illiterate moron.

    2. Re:Don't be silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y r teh grammer natzees allways so angrey?

    3. Re:Don't be silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the grammar Nazis are always confused with the spelling Nazis.

  38. Re:Solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That reminds me of a Breakfast Club quote: "Demented and sad... but social."

  39. One tweet... by Stick32 · · Score: 1

    One tweet to rule them all... One tweet to find them... One tweet follow them all... and in the darkness... pitch them your script for your Lord of the rings spin-offs.

  40. Reminded of 'The Wizard of Oz' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better watch out for the Twitterbug... ;)

  41. Haha Turkish Metal Killed Twitter..... by Shadow_139 · · Score: 1

    "Twitter bug and ensuing 0 followers/0 following fiasco was inadvertently started by a Turkish fan of heavy metal band Accept. When this young man tweeted "Accept pwnz," he found that the user @pwnz was suddenly following him."

  42. Accept "@" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Follow Me Bitch!

  43. Sorry to go so far off topic-- by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    but how did you acquire your ticket? cash?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Sorry to go so far off topic-- by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yeah, of course.. That's one of the things that flag you. And I bought it through an ad in the Sunday paper at the last minute because the price was so cheap. They gave me all sorts of shit. I know I "fit a description". Fuck them.. Bitch was completely convinced I was carrying.. Even said so as I was leaving.. "You just don't have it on you." Fuck them twice.. Five days later four airliners crashed almost simultaneously.. by people who had credit cards.. All their papers were in order

      But now, in these days of hysteria of our post 9/11 world, they can hold you for a lot longer for no reason at all.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Sorry to go so far off topic-- by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      but how did you acquire your ticket? cash?

      Yes, actually.

      PROTIP: Buying a ticket for "next flight to <X>" at the airport using cash gets you instantly flagged for Special Treatment... Handy if you're at a busy airport. :-)

  44. Re:Solution... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    Too bad there is no -1 Making me envious moderation.

    Its not a good thing.

  45. nonono:: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chmod +5 ---funny 'Dan East':318230

  46. Security through Obscurity? HA HA HA by SoTerrified · · Score: 1

    As a programmer, I found the story of how the 'bug' was discovered quite amusing.

    "The bug was inadvertently exposed by a Turkish fan of the German heavy metal band ACCEPT. When this young man tweeted "Accept pwnz," he found that the user @pwnz was suddenly following him." (Details (in Turkish) at http://inci.sozlukspot.com/e/4266098/)

    This should forever be used as an example of why security through obscurity is no security at all.