Slashdot Mirror


Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange Has Passport Confiscated

Taco Cowboy writes "The Australian founder of the whistleblower website Wikileaks had his passport confiscated by police when he arrived in Melbourne last week. While Assange has made himself particularly unpopular with the US military by publishing video of attacks on civilians in Iraq, he's been something of a thorn in the side for the Australian government too. Last year, Wikileaks published a list of websites which were to be banned under the government's proposed Internet filter. While the aim of the filter is to block extreme pornography and the like, the blacklist included a number of more prosaic sites such as those of a travel company and a dentist.

24 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    While it was returned 15 minutes later

    Man, they are brutal down in Melbourne. And from the original article linked at TG Daily:

    The Age has been told that Assange's passport is classified "normal" on the immigration database, meaning the Wikileaks director can travel freely on it.

    They really know how to shake people up and intimidate you. Sounds almost as bad as my trip through United States customs coming back from vacation. They abducted me for three hours as I was forced to stand in line awaiting inspection and approval. They called it standard processing but I tell you what--it was more of a death march.

    Australia would have to be insane to do something like that to Assange. He would trot that out in front of the media for weeks if that was what happened. What a claim to legitimacy. And for that reason I'm guessing this is likely a natural passport process turned into a PR stunt.

    Assange mentioned it in an SBS Dateline interview.

    So basically Australia said, "We need to renew your overly used passport and the authorities are looking into how you got a hold of a blacklist from our government." <sarcasm>The poor man! When will the persecution stop?! The only way you can only mitigate his suffering by making a tiny donation to Wikileaks.org.</sarcasm>

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, Ghandi said it best: first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they point out that your passport has expired, then they ignore you again.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      First they ignore you
      Then laugh at you
      Then hate you
      Then they fight you
      Then you win - you are here

      Then you do a FATALITY!
      Then the next challenger laughs at you.

    3. Re:For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by Cimexus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod parent up. This is a ~complete non-story~. Same thing happened to me a few years ago with my old and tatty passport. They routinely do this for damaged passports (for various reasons, the primary one being they don't go through the auto passport readers so well). They'll also do this for passports with 6 months validity on them when you enter (most countries do this). The only 'unusual' thing here is that it happened to someone in the public spotlight.

      The TFA also includes a massive non-sequitur, mentioning an unrelated case (that was dropped by the AFP) that has nothing whatsoever to do with the passport issue. I doubt the immigration officer concerned even knew who he was.

      Can't believe this actually made the Slashdot front page.

    4. Re:For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by FuckingNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I remember a time when Americans would be bothered by being detained by any government official for more than 0 minutes. Looks like consent's been well manufactured in you.

    5. Re:For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's "Gandhi".

      OK, First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they correct your spelling.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    6. Re:For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Troll? Really? Hardly. He's just expressing his opinion. You don't have to like it, but that's no reason to censor him via subtracting points until his post disappears.

      I agree with his sentiment. I was detained in Texas by an "internal security checkpoint" or whatever the hell it's called. I was within 50 miles of the international border, and had never crossed it, but they still wanted to search the trunk of my car. I refused to comply. They made me stand-around while they shined* lights through the window of my car, and then held their ear against the trunk, before finally letting me go an hour later.

      Now anyone with common sense could have looked at my Maryland license plus how I was dressed (shorts/Tshirt), and realized I was a tourist not a smuggler. I don't know what they thought they'd find. There's not much room to hide anyone in a two-seater.

      Anyway: Rights don't have meaning unless you use them. INSIST upon compliance; refuse to consent to warrantless searches and remain silent.

      *
      * Irregular verbs are illogical. They should be added to the list of obsolete words. IMHO.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Funny

      >>>British Commonweal.

      Is this the Middle English speeling? Well let me call in me wyf. She war an Anglish taughter.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by twidarkling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now anyone with common sense could have looked at my Maryland license plus how I was dressed (shorts/Tshirt), and realized I was a tourist not a smuggler.

      While I congratulate you on your refusal to comply for no reason, I have to point out this is one of the absolute butt-fuckingly stupidest things I've ever read. In your world, do burglars go around in striped shirts and small black masks over their eyes, carrying sacks with dollar signs on them? Do pirates all have wooden peg legs and eye patches?

      "I didn't look like a smuggler so obviously I wasn't one." Christ.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    9. Re:For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by linzeal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As someone who has a few friends who work on the border patrol I can tell you the last thing they want to do is arrest someone, it is a lot of paperwork, going to court and they don't let you work overtime those weeks you are in court like they used to. What, you did not know that is why cops arrest so many people? The sweet sweet overtime, which can double their salaries has made police unions actually protest when they makes plans to hire more cops and reduce overtime.

      It is a growing concern that the more time a cop spends testifying per week the more likely he will get overtime, which is a major problem, and not just for budget reasons.

    10. Re:For a Whole Fifteen Minutes by psm321 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's unfortunate that you expected better treatment because of your license plate/looks, and not because _nobody_ should by treated like that without strong probable cause or preferably a warrant.

  2. Move along. Nothing to see here by kentrel · · Score: 4, Informative

    He has a criminal record. His passport was old. They cancelled it. He got it back.

  3. A bit too much sensationalism even for Slashdot by erroneus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The first paragraph of the article said it was returned within 15 minutes and informed that it would be canceled... I presume it would be his passport that would be canceled when he returns, but it doesn't say so. Then the article goes on to say the things cited in the summary.

    What I am pointing out is that whoever created the summary didn't just "miss" that 15 minutes later detail, they omitted it intentionally.

    So I ask you directly, submitter, what exactly are you trying to make happen by attempting to twist the news this way? Have you no conscience at all about spreading incomplete and therefore misleading information? By intentionally omitting that important detail, it misleads people to believe he is being detained in Australia for all intents and purposes.

    1. Re:A bit too much sensationalism even for Slashdot by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      BROWN LEAVES HOTEL.

      The bird is on the tree. I repeat. THE BIRD IS ON THE TREE.

  4. Re:Assassinated by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did anyone else see "Wikileaks founder Assassinated" before taking a second look?

    No, most of us can read.

  5. Must Have It Rough by Revotron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some people are just natural-born troublemakers, going to great lengths to make a big deal out of every possible scenario. I'd like to see how he acted as a child.

    But in all seriousness, 15 minutes? And he's crying and blowing his whistle? I've been detained longer for having a penny stuck in my shoe.

    I wonder if he sleeps with a katana.

  6. Weekly World Slashdot by autophile · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next on Slashdot... BatBoy sighted on ChatRoulette, and Cmdr Taco has love child by alien visitor.

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  7. I'm becoming... by fauxhemian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...more and more dubious about Assange and his intentions. http://cryptome.org/0001/wikileaks-funds.htm

    --
    I've got news for Mr. Santayana: we're doomed to repeat the past no matter what. That's what it is to be alive.
    1. Re:I'm becoming... by shish · · Score: 4, Informative

      Relatedly, does anyone know /how/ it costs $600,000 to run the site? Since it's been offline and collecting donations for as long as I've known it, I'm not sure what it does, but the name implies "a wiki where people can upload leaked stuff", for which I would imagine $2000 in hardware and $2000/year in bandwidth would be generous...

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  8. The dentist site was censored with a reason by mangu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wouldn't you censor a dentist that has a sign like this?

  9. Re:Assassinated by Lunatrik · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, most of us can read.

    Citation Needed!

  10. Re:Absolute power by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

    AC power corrupts, then it doesn't then it does then it doesn't...

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  11. Wikileaks != Wikipedia by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why is this tagged "Wikipedia"? Wikileaks is a completely separate site and organization. Do you think that "protons" are "protozoa" are the same thing just because they start with he same four letters?

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  12. Pretty typical for Canada by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You found a US immigration agent with a sense of humor?

    Actually I've found the US immigration and border patrol people you meet in Canada are generally very good and, as long as you do you best to follow the rules, they have all been very helpful. I like to think that being based here means that a little of Canada is rubbing of on them. This is in stark contrast to the ones I used to meeting while living in the US with a green card who frankly seemed to be actively looking for any excuse not to let you enter.