Slashdot Mirror


Testing and Mapping a Cellular Data Network?

bgsneeze writes "In order to resolve an ongoing issue with a vendor, I have been trying to find a way to test different 3G data devices empirically. I would like to be able to chart signal strength, latency, and bandwidth. I would also like to create a map of the coverage area. I have a test 3G card from three different providers. I would like to be able to travel with the setup to several different locations and run tests. What software or techniques would Slashdotters use to test the different devices? Are there any free or open source software packages that will do this?"

14 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. MyTrueCoverage/Root Mobile by mtmra70 · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.mytruecoverage.com/ is a good site to show coverage. You can install an app on your phone then manually run tests. The results usually take 12-36 hours to post to the website.

  2. Re:hack something in perl by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why do it yourself when you can just wait for Google to announce they did it accidentally ;-)

  3. Big Money; Lots of variables by TheOddOne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Empirical testing with wireless CELLULAR networks can be very tricky; A few things that you will need to keep in mind is that for testing, you want to make sure your transceiver setup is perfectly reproducable; Same card, same ANTENNA, same position of antenna. When performing your testing, your signal strength will depend on several factors: Distance from the site, antenna type/gain, and specifically what sector/node on the site you happen to be on. while driving in a straight line, you may find that you approach steep nulls near the border of a cells sector boundary. Alot depends on the ability of your particular card to handle the handoff between sectors/sites.

      Your latency measurements will also vary according to the individual usage of the sector/site that you are currently on, and additionally vary with time and also variable bandwidth allocation to the sites from the main switch.

    There are quite a few test sets and software suited that are commercially available and are tailored for this use, and are used heavily by the mobile data/cellular industry in their drive testing and coverage verification methodologies.

    Good luck to you on your testing.

    --ToO

  4. Re:Don't waste your time by bughunter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These are simply links to the coverage maps advertised by the providers, in which service quality is frequently exaggerated, if not blatantly false.

    For example, AT&T (my provider) claims "good" coverage in two neighborhoods in my home town, Pasadena, where I know for a fact that there is no coverage, or worse, sporadic one-bar-then-no-bar coverage that drains my cellphone battery in an hour. And even worse, they show "best" coverage throughout San Marino, a town in which I can never make or receive calls on AT&T.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  5. Obligatory reference: by zill · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you ping me yet?







    How about now?

  6. cdrouter by mveloso · · Score: 3, Informative

    Industry standard?

    http://www.qacafe.com/cdrouter

  7. Re:3G by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you mean the USB/PC card 3G adapters for computers, I doubt you'll be able to run them on Linux without using WINE or a VM or whatever, which may interfere with latency readings...........Note: too lazy to dig up hacks and testamonials from Google.

    Sigh.......this is the kind of misconception that happens when you are too lazy to use Google. Those USB/PC card 3G adapters for computers work quite well on Linux, here is one example tutorial. Try not to give advice if you are too lazy to verify it.

    --
    Qxe4
  8. Re:Good Luck With That by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, if you have 3G cards from three different providers, and your company wants to know which one to use to deploy their new fancy device, and they don't actually trust any of those providers (for good reason), it may be a good idea to go out and make sure with real world tests before you jump to one provider or another.

    --
    Qxe4
  9. I had to do something similar. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the end, the project was cancelled before we got a chance to get to test 3G coverage. But we did get to think about it. Our customer was a fleet of cargo ships, going through a fixed path on the Rio de la Plata (River Plate). Basically, we were going to install our CCTV system in there, and have it push images and other information to our servers whenever it had signal. We wanted to know approximately in what areas of the river we would have signal. We were going to base our system on the Vodafone mobile connect driver. It's a set of Python scripts. Of course, it communicates with the modem using simple AT commands. It's released under the GPL. It is capable of measuring signal, sending and receiving text messages, and other nice stuff (like, well, actually dialing and calling PPP to stablish the connection). We had it working with several Huawei devices, but I know it works with other brands too.

    Our idea was to modify this scripts so that they would try to maintain a connection, auto-dial every time it disconnected, and log the signal at certain intervals to a MySQL DB. We were also going to run download tests all the time automatically. Since there was no chance we would go on the ships with the devices (the ships were cargo ships that transported and extracted sand, and there weren't very comfortable, not to mention their average trip was at least ~72 hs.), so we wanted to do all of this automatically. The devices would also inform their IP to a web service every time their IP changed, so we could SSH in the machine running this tests in case we needed to change something.

    We were going to add a GPS to this system, that would also log its position at certain intervals, so that we could then generate a color-coded signal map.

    I hope this helps. It's really fairly simple. I would be happy to provide you with source code, but we didn't get that far into the project as to produce actual source code, since the customer changed his mind due to budget restrictions real early. Feel free to contact me if you have other questions {almafuerte (at) gmail (dot) com}

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  10. Academic paper on that topic by DrCompE · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~suman/pubs/citywide.pdf
    ABSTRACT
    We describe our experiences in building a city-wide infrastructure for wide-area wireless experimentation. Our infrastructure has two components — (i) a vehicular testbed consisting of wireless nodes, each equipped with both cellular (EV-DO) and WiFi interfaces, and mounted on city buses plying in Madison, Wisconsin, and (ii) a software platform to utilize these testbed nodes to continuously monitor and characterize performance of large scale wireless networks, such as city-wide mesh networks, unplanned deployments of WiFi hotspots, and cellular networks. Beyond our initial eorts in building and deploying this infrastructure, we have also utilized it to gain some initial understanding of the diversity of user experience in large-scale wireless networks, especially under various mobility scenarios. Since our vehicle-mounted testbed nodes have fairly deterministic mobility patterns, they provide us with much needed performance data on parameters such as RF coverage and available bandwidth, as well as quantify the impact of mobility on performance. We use our initial measurements from this testbed to showcase its ability to provide an ecient, low-cost, and robust method to monitor our target wireless networks. These initial measurements also highlight the challenges we face as we continue to expand this infrastructure. We discuss what these challenges are and how we intend to address them.

  11. Signal quality isn't a comparable measure by lordlod · · Score: 4, Informative
    Signal quality numbers are about as meaningful as CPU numbers.

    A bigger number on the same device probably means you have a better signal. A 'two' on one device could be equivalent to a 'five' on another or a 'one' on a third. There is no standard that is used across the industry, or even across all devices from a given manufacturer.

    When a device manufacturer gets customer reviews that say "I only get one bar with your phone but two from company X" the device manufacturer can either try and explain repeatedly that their one bar is better than X's two bars and that unlike X you can still make phone calls on our device on one bar. Or they can just double the number of bars reported on the next model so they don't look worse than X.

    Which do you think they do?

    To do a real test you need to use a constant antenna and location, attenuating the signal gradually until each device stops functioning. The amount of attenuation it can take is a crude indicator of the quality of the radio.

  12. Re:3G by fandingo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dan Williams, the guy behind Network Manager, does a lot of work to get cellular modems working in Linux. There seems to be lots working and steady process on others.
    His blog http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/ is informative and frankly pretty hilarious in a geeky way.

    Props to Dan for doing a great job.

  13. Re:One idea by stoborrobots · · Score: 3, Funny

    P.S. The only thing better than the "grad student technique" is the "summer intern technique"

    Especially if she's hot...

  14. Re:Good Luck With That by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd tell you stories, but my therapist says I'm close to recovery...