Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Restore Youthful Memory In Aging Mice

An anonymous reader writes "German neuroscientists made a breakthrough in 'age-related cognitive decline', a common condition that often begins in one's late 40s (especially declarative memory — the ability to recall facts and experiences). Their new study identifies a genetic 'switch' for the cluster of learning and memory genes that cause memory impairment in aging mice. By injecting an enzyme, the team 'flipped' the switch to its on position for older mice, giving them the memory and learning performance they'd enjoyed when they were young. Now the team ultimately hopes to recover seemingly lost long-term memory in human patients." The video, which explains the gene flipping mechanism, is worth a watch (2:18).

145 comments

  1. Restore Youthful Memory In Aging Mice by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    So they remember everything, but they don't know anything?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Restore Youthful Memory In Aging Mice by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny

      So they remember everything, but they don't know anything?

      Silence, Pinky, or I shall have to hurt you.

    2. Re:Restore Youthful Memory In Aging Mice by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      If this gets on the market, we'll never forget any cheese anymore.

    3. Re:Restore Youthful Memory In Aging Mice by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Mod -1 PETA

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Restore Youthful Memory In Aging Mice by wye43 · · Score: 1

      So they remember everything, but they don't know anything?

      Silence, Pinky, or I shall have to hurt you.

      Brilliant, Brain! Oh, one quick question: Do sealions eat seazebras?

  2. Hmmmm by socceroos · · Score: 1

    I'm not in my 40's yet and I already need this done to me...

    1. Re:Hmmmm by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're that young and already having memory problems (assuming you don't have a brain tumor or something), it's lifestyle related. Get out and exercise, eat well, there's probably some nutrient you're missing. Eat lot's of broccoli. Sleep enough. Don't under-estimate the brain wasting effects of alcohol or cocaine. I don't know you so I can't say exactly what your personal problem is.

      A lot of people, for example, don't eat enough vegetables. They'll eat a salad once a week or an apple every few days or something and hope that's good enough. It's not. You may not notice the effects right away, but over time they will add up as your body uses up its stored nutrients.

      Same thing with sleep. When you are in college you can get away with binge drinking on the weekends and never sleeping (actually you'll notice the effects of that right away, but they might not be overwhelming), but after a few years you're going to need to take a break and rebuild your energy. A lot of people hit 28 and think they are getting old and tired, but the truth is old-age doesn't set in that early, they're just seeing the effects of not treating their body right. Do what you need to do to rebuild your energy (personally I suggest distance running, and this book is really great motivation, but do what works for you).

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Hmmmm by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm totally with you, esp. on the last point. My wife and I had a kid a year ago, and sleep hasn't been the same since. Over the same period of time, I've learned for the first time in my life what it means to have to be humble about my memory. Used to be near photographic. Now it's all a jumble. Shows you what 13 months of 5 hours a night of sleep (with the occasional additional nap to almost catch up) will do to you.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    3. Re:Hmmmm by geekoid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Bull shit.

      Shut the hell up.

      There is nothing to back what you are saying, and that book, while mildly entertaining, is full of crap.

      People like you are HURTING people.

      Ftwad.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can take amphetamines.

    5. Re:Hmmmm by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      lol someone got hit in the head with the dumb stick today and spewed out his wrath on Slashdot. Since when did you go from writing logical, reasonable posts to writing ad hominem crap? There are tons of studies that show that exercise is good for you, and that eating a healthy diet is good for you, and that sleeping well is good for you. Stop being lazy and asking for evidence when you can find it so easily yourself.

      --
      Qxe4
    6. Re:Hmmmm by Smooth+and+Shiny · · Score: 1

      I'm not in my 40's yet and I already need this done to me...

      Need what done to you?

    7. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we did. Don't you remember?

    8. Re:Hmmmm by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Everything sounds great, except the bit about distance running. Running isn't really good for your body; it's really hard on your joints, especially if you run on concrete or asphalt (which just about everything in a metro area is covered with these days).

      I recommend cycling instead. It's better exercise, uses at least as many calories (as long as you don't ride lazily), and doesn't cause joint injuries. It's also a lot better if you're flat-footed like me. It also gets you around a whole lot faster, and if you're really lucky in where you live and work, you might be able to use it for commuting instead of driving, so you can get your exercise as part of going to and from work.

    9. Re:Hmmmm by socceroos · · Score: 1

      You could say that its lifestyle related - but having sleep apnoea doesn't help.

      I eat, on average, 3 pieces of fruit a day (not sure if that is insufficient or not). Normally an apple, banana or two and a mandarin.

      Broccoli? Not so much... Vegies? Yeah, normally when I have tea (evening meal).

      Exercise? Two-hour BJJ sessions twice a week and also Futsal once a week (45 min fast paced game).

      Sleep? Never enough.

    10. Re:Hmmmm by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Informative

      Heck, while I'm at it, I found some studies for you. Here's a reference to a study that found exercise even keeps your telomeres in your cells longer. This one at Stanford that lasted 20 years found that running specifically helps keep you healthy, they said, "Elderly runners have fewer disabilities, a longer span of active life and are half as likely as aging nonrunners to die early deaths."

      And then there's this one, a study of over 100,000 people that basically found the more you run each week, the less likely you are to develop high blood pressure, diabetes, or high cholesterol, although the study author thinks (for whatever it's worth) that a similar effect would be found for swimming or cycling or any other aerobic exercise.

      So yeah, there's tons to back up what I said. You may disagree with those studies, and no science is perfect, but there's a good bunch of evidence.

      --
      Qxe4
    11. Re:Hmmmm by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The catch-phrase slogan is five-a-day for fruits and veggies, so if you make sure to get some vegetables with your evening meal you're probably "ok".

      We just joined a CSA (community supported agriculture). While I like the idea of eating food produced locally, organically, in season, I really like the concept of being given large batches of food and having to cook with it. In one session it's broken us out of our usual dining ruts; over the past week we've had several vegetables I'd never eaten before...

      First ever beet, in a beet and carrot slaw (shredded beets and carrots, lemon zest and juice, a bit of honey, a few drops hot sauce, served raw).

      First ever kohlrabi (didn't even know how to cut it or what part was edible at first, but diced it and some potato, tossed in olive oil, added a bit of pepper, and baked at 450 for half an hour, stirring occasionally).

      Now I hope we don't get those every week for the next year, but in a few weeks they'll be gone and something new will be unexpectedly thrust upon me. Interesting concept but it's working so far.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    12. Re:Hmmmm by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      You sound like my mom ... you're right, mind you, but you still sound like my mom.

      As a chronic insomniac I can attest to the damage caused by the lack of sleep. I used to be nice, logical, and even had good grammar and spelling. Now, not so much .. if at all.

    13. Re:Hmmmm by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that pretty much sucks. I have no clue what to do with sleep Apnea, maybe get some breathe right strips lol? or maybe sleep on your side instead of your back? That might help.

      --
      Qxe4
    14. Re:Hmmmm by russotto · · Score: 1

      Why is it always vegetables and pain? I don't know if you'll live longer eating broccoli and distance running, but it'll sure feel longer. Especially if you really do improve your memory...

    15. Re:Hmmmm by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Here's a quote I remember when I exercise: "If exercise feels like work, you're doing it wrong." If eating broccoli and distance running is miserable for you, then you should change something up a bit.

      --
      Qxe4
    16. Re:Hmmmm by mmarlett · · Score: 1

      After a few years of running moderate distances, I ran a marathon in 2001. That day, after running 26 miles, I drank for 12 hours. Then I ate a dozen Krispy Kreme donuts. I refer to it as my triathlon. I was fine the next day and for a few weeks, then my knees started really complaining about the running addiction. My knees were fine with the beer and donuts.

      I've slept four to six hours a night for nearly 20 years now. I drink three to six beers a day, but rarely at a rate greater than one per hour. I have two donuts every other day for breakfast. I got about 30 pounds heavier than I was when I was running 60 miles a week. I could do without it.

      So, two years ago, I picked up cycling. After a year of riding my bike to work every day (15 miles round trip, morning donut stop included), I'd lost about 15 pounds. Then I got run over by a little old lady who ran a red light. She had a senior moment and didn't see the light, the half-dozen other stopped cars or the fully lit and reflective cyclist.

      So, yeah yeah yeah ... take care of your body. Whatever. Shit happens.

      I've never had any unique or interesting memory problems. I beat the 11-year-old neighbor kid on the Wii Fit stuff all the time; my Wii Fit age is usually almost half my actual age (37). In some ways, I remember much more than I used to. I have a little more trouble learning new things, but I learn them better and with more confidence. Maybe I'm just a better listener.

    17. Re:Hmmmm by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Y'know, I'm really trying to see where you are coming from on your post (that's apparently already been modded as flamebait), but I don't know if I'm seeing it from your point of view.

      Are you actually suggesting that recommending eating vegetables, not depriving oneself of sleep, and regular exercise is actually pushing some sort of agenda that not only does not benefit the individual but is actually harmful? If so, please cite sources... this could be interesting.

      If it's not that, I'm at a loss... your remarks actually seem rather non sequitur outside of the above interpretation.

    18. Re:Hmmmm by Kjella · · Score: 1

      There's no doubt that the easiest way to be healthy is to stay healthy, they're running because they're in good shape and they're in good shape because they run. Obviously runners are more healthy than the general population because you've excluded everyone with hip/knee/foot injuries, heart conditions, lung conditions and whatnot that says they can't, shouldn't be or will have trouble running.

      Many people choose the same circle in reverse, they're not exercising because they're in bad shape and they're in bad shape because they don't exercise. Using modern technology you can live almost without doing any manual labor without huge health problems, as long as you aren't also trying to eat yourself to death or whatever. I've tried both and being in good shape is better but it's an easy slip and a heavy climb.

      Exercising when you're in bad shape is quite frankly mostly annoying and not very healthy beyond enabling you to exercise more. You're just not in the shape where you can keep up a decent calorie burn long enough for it to matter, your limbs are weak and more prone to injury under excessive weight. All you get in the beginning are aches and pains as you build muscles and joints to get real exercise done.

      I took me about a month of two to three heavy sessions per week (for my shape) and light exercise every day before it started to make any real impact. Then I suddenly passed some kind of peak where the kilos started flowing off, the exercise got easier and easier to do and it was all steady sailing. But you have to be willing to do a real program and pass that peak, if I had given up after two weeks this would have been nothing but frustration and bad memories. So if you're committed to making a change in your life go for it but it's like "Aw alright, I'll take ONE exercise round and decide afterwards" then with 99% probability they will fail.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    19. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice hippie!

      *pats phantomfive on the head*

      Now, go have a nice fruit salad and a joint, mmmkay?

    20. Re:Hmmmm by MoeDumb · · Score: 0

      Go fish oil, young man, fish oil!

      --
      Mod Me Up. You'll make a grown man cry.
    21. Re:Hmmmm by cc1984_ · · Score: 1

      Please, stop feeding the trolls.

      Unless it's broccoli and fish oil that is :)

    22. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody got hit with the "know it all douche-bag stick" this morning. You may be right, but you don't need to be such an insufferable ass about it.

    23. Re:Hmmmm by beerbear · · Score: 1

      From my experience, BJJ sessions tend to spend too much time doing anaerobic work, which means stress for your body. In small measures this is not a problem, but it's definitely not in the same league as more-or-less casual jogging and cycling.

      --
      Hold my beer and watch this!
    24. Re:Hmmmm by Flammon · · Score: 1

      Hi phantomfive,

      I'm guessing that you're a runner and you're lucky to have the necessary dopamine production in your brain to motivate you to do so. The people here who are criticizing the benefits of exercise have probably never tried it and are probably talking out of their asses. Unfortunately for them, it's very difficult to get started because ironically, dopamine production is dependent on good nutrition and exercise.

      I've done both, run and not run and when I don't run, I feel like shit and I'm depressed. It's hard to believe that people can live that way.

      Short story. I started to play chess about 1½ years ago and my rating for the first month was between 900 and 1000. I'm now rated at about 1450 and have progressed much faster than the people I play with who are interestingly not physically active. I don't have any special abilities nor do I spend an extraordinary amount of time learning chess - certainly no more than anyone else in the club.

      I believe that my ability to learn quickly can be attributed to my healthy lifestyle. I run 60 - 120 km per week and eat very nutritious food.

    25. Re:Hmmmm by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      I recommend cycling instead.

      I've seen plenty of fat bicyclists in my time. You don't see nearly as many fat runners.

      It's better exercise, uses at least as many calories (as long as you don't ride lazily), and doesn't cause joint injuries.

      It's an easier exercise because you're not subjecting your body to nearly as much stress. If I wanted my exercise to be easy, I'd drive a car everywhere.

    26. Re:Hmmmm by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's an easier exercise because you're not subjecting your body to nearly as much stress.

      Wrong. The loads you put on your muscles are significantly higher, especially if you ride in higher gears. The difference is that you don't have any impacts; all the motions are smooth.

    27. Re:Hmmmm by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Well if those actions did nothing then it would be a waste of time and money (which equals time). There is alot of advice out there that I think qualifies as that but usually its some sort of obfuscation of the more fruits/vegetables, sleep more, and get exercise holy trinity that somehow gets your money transferred to someone else's pocket. As to whether buying fish oil supplements matter if you are already eating healthy (as goes for most people who buy it)... I'd say thats still up for debate.

    28. Re:Hmmmm by wye43 · · Score: 1

      I'm totally with you, esp. on the last point. My wife and I had a kid a year ago, and sleep hasn't been the same since. Over the same period of time, I've learned for the first time in my life what it means to have to be humble about my memory. Used to be near photographic. Now it's all a jumble. Shows you what 13 months of 5 hours a night of sleep (with the occasional additional nap to almost catch up) will do to you.

      Sounds like the perfect birth control pill ad!
      1. Take pill
      2. ...
      3. Memory works better
      4. Profit!

    29. Re:Hmmmm by wye43 · · Score: 1

      You know what else is good for you? There are tons of studies that shows if you kiss my ass, it's good for you. Also stopping being a douche is good for you.
      Here is an evidence: after college days, I never stopped binge drinking(only accelerated the ammount and frequency), eating fat and meat, no vegetables and I never work out. Now it's 20 years later, my health is perfect, I have perfectly balanced weight and my income has doubled every 3 years. I am serious. Apparently this kind of lifestyle is good for you!

    30. Re:Hmmmm by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      The loads it puts on your leg muscles are significantly higher. The loads on your arms, your mid-section, your skeletal structure, muscle stabilizers, etc., are next-to-none.

    31. Re:Hmmmm by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's what the gym is for. There's lots of machines there for exercising specific muscle groups with configurable resistances, without causing impact injuries.

    32. Re:Hmmmm by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Also stopping being a douche is good for you. Here is an evidence: after college days, I.......

      Non-sequitur; since you sir, are clearly a douche.

      --
      Qxe4
    33. Re:Hmmmm by bitty · · Score: 1

      Running isn't really good for your body; it's really hard on your joints, especially if you run on concrete or asphalt (which just about everything in a metro area is covered with these days).

      The big problem with running is the lousy shoes that all but force you to use a heel strike. It's the heel strike that trashes your knees and hips, and leads to fatigue very quickly. Take the shoes off and run barefoot, landing flat-footed or on the balls of your feet. At first you'll discover muscles you haven't been using, then you'll find yourself wondering why you wasted all that money on expensive running shoes.

    34. Re:Hmmmm by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes, that'll work great on hot concrete and asphalt...

      We don't live in wild grasslands any more.

  3. This research is phenomal! by JDSalinger · · Score: 5, Informative

    My grandmother slowly died of Alzheimer's and it could not have been a sadder thing to witness. Bias fully admitted, I can't help but say... Alzheimer's is the 7th leading cause of death and it afflicts 19% of people aged 75-84 and over 40% of people over 84. If we care about our elders and we care about the shoes we will one day fill, we should all help raise awareness and put our spare money and time to good use.

    The toll of Alzheimer's on America is estimated at about $100 billion per year. If only we could convince Congress of the simple truth, that this sort of basic research will completely pay for itself in the long run and do wonders for humanity. Unfortunately, we can't depend on someone else to pay for this knowledge and progress. We must all pitch in what we can and help keep this sort of research as well funded as possible.

    www.alz.org is a great organization if you have money to donate. Or you can easily start a "Memory Walk" team to go out for a charity walk to raise money and awareness. Plus, can't we all use a good excuse to enjoy a nice day in the sun and have fun with friends and family?

    1. Re:This research is phenomal! by tsotha · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not clear to me a treatment for normal cognitive decline would necessarily be effective for Alzheimer's.

    2. Re:This research is phenomal! by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      I don't fully agree with the opinion I'm about to present, but one of your statements just seems wrong.

      How would this research pay for itself in the long run? These are generally older people that are afflicted with the disease. The types of people that are either done with their working careers or nearly so, and contribute little or nothing to the tax base. In fact, they either are drawing or are soon to draw on the social programs like Social Security and Medicare. By reducing the number of geriatric deaths, we increase the economic burden of these programs, thereby making us pay even more for the research. Wouldn't it make more economic sense to require the elderly to go down to an office in order to collect their Social Security and Medicare benefits, and if they forget to do so, pocket the change? (No, they could not collect multiple times.)

      Now, I in no way would really want to back the stance of the last question, nor want to avoid researching a cure. I just think either I'm missing something, or your statement is wrong.

    3. Re:This research is phenomal! by hackerman · · Score: 1

      What he means is that investing a (relatively) small amount on money now could mean less spending in the future.

    4. Re:This research is phenomal! by plastbox · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine it costs a whole lot more to keep an aged Alzheimer's patient alive (and relatively happy) that it costs to pay a retired individual who is capable of caring for themselves to do just that. And besides, who cares about expenses in this regard? Yes, I know, everyone cares about money, but the few bucks I'll get once I retire will absolutely pale in comparison to the amount of money I have payed due to all sorts of taxes (I live in Norway, where I pay ~36% income tax, 24% tax on anything I buy, ~80% tax on tobacco, alcohol and fossil fuels, etc.).

    5. Re:This research is phenomal! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If you can prevent Alzheimer's and other age related decay these folks can keep working.

    6. Re:This research is phenomal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get rid of Social Security and Medicare..

    7. Re:This research is phenomal! by blue+trane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point of civilization is knowledge. Knowledge allows us to predict and adapt to sudden catastrophic environmental change, hence it improves our survival fitness. Economics is just a way to increase knowledge.

      If economics is a science, how well does the current model predict economic downturns, or Japan's having a 200% debt-to-gdp ratio but no inflation, low unemployment, and a strong currency?

      The current model of economics appears to include an axiom: the creation of money should be in private hands. Can we challenge this axiom, given examples such as Japan, or our own history (Lincoln printing greenbacks, govt making up over 40% of GDP during WWII, inflation not much of a concern during Reagan's run-up of the debt, etc.)? Is it not suspicious that the main proponents of the current economics are the beneficiaries of a system where banks have a monopoly on money creation? Why can't the people's elected representatives create money too?

    8. Re:This research is phenomal! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      But the odds are they will eventually get something else expensive before dying.

      If it's all about economics we'd be happy to let the smokers smoke. After all in countries like the UK they pay more in tobacco tax than they cost the health system every year. So basically smokers are subsidizing the nonsmokers.

      Fact is, eventually you are going to die. Once you're no longer producing $$$ for the country you're starting to cost it $$$.

      Sure it could be your own money, but most people if they retired would eventually run out of money - unless they're the rich people who collect rents from everyone (but they start looking like the **AA bunch - not contributing much just collecting rent). Lastly not everyone can be rich enough to collect rent from everyone :).

      Lastly no, it can't just be about economics. Good economics and high productivity must not be goals in themselves, they can help with providing a better life for most. But we have to be realistic about it, and not be ignorant about it. The economics are worse if we had old retired people living longer and healthier. Now if we had older working people living longer and healthier, then the economics are better. If the young bunch are fine with paying for the former case (because they think it's civilized and good) then that's great. But if instead the older people start making up the majority and vote so that the younger ones pay against their will, then more of the younger ones might leave and eventually things will go bad.

      --
    9. Re:This research is phenomal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandfather's 9 year battle with Alzheimer's racked up almost half a million dollars in professional care, and that's just the easily quantifiable tip of the financial iceberg.

    10. Re:This research is phenomal! by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Without any specific knowledge of the situations you mentioned, I will say that all of that came back to bite everyone on the ass later and what was going on is that the people in control of the money were also reporting/controlling the nations state of affairs. Also I agree the federal reserve is bad. I'd be interested to know how the yen works... I'd look it up but I would just Wikipedia it (not do it correctly) right now anyway.

  4. What I'd like to know, is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can I have an injection of that please? :P

  5. Wow...... by irreverant · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I'm old I'll be able to recall how i misspent my youth. How depressing!

    --
    Of all the things I've lost; I miss my mind the most. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Wow...... by ChefInnocent · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why am I reminded of the multi-attributed quote: If you remember the sixties, you weren't really there?

  6. Oh great by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was looking forward to an old age filled with pleasant memories of my many moon landings, that time I helped a young Jewish girl hide from the Spaniards, my service in the Gulf of Afgiraq, and my sexual exploits with Morgan Fairchild. And now you're going to take that away from me?

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Oh great by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Two old men were out walking with their wives. The first man says to the other man, "I had a great dinner last night at... what was that place? Uh, what's the name of that red flower?" The second man suggests, "Rose?" The first goes on, "That's it." He then calls over to his wife, "Hey, Rose! What's the name of that restaurant we went to last night?"

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Oh great by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Waiting for God, awesome show. They need an American Version.

  7. Declarative memory in general declines, but... by raving+griff · · Score: 4, Informative

    While declarative memory does decline as one ages, only recall memory is affected while the ability to recognize does not significantly decline.

    That is, people over 40 tend to decline in scores on fill-in-the-blank tests without a word bank (that require the taker to recall a specific answer) while staying about the same on multiple choice tests, where the answer must be recognized.

  8. I've said this before... by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

    but I'll say it again: never before in our history has there been such a good time as now to be a mouse!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:I've said this before... by spun · · Score: 0

      but I'll say it again: never before in our history has there been such a good time as now to be a mouse!

      Except that being a mouse has been proven to cause cancer in laboratory mice.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:I've said this before... by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, scientists have been scientifically proven to cause cancer in laboratory mice.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:I've said this before... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Correlation != Causation. You might as well say "Injecting mice with carcinogens is scientifically proven to cause cancer". As if!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  9. Your missing the benefits by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    You can hide your own Easter eggs, and you can laugh at the same joke every day! Of course they have problems too... like they forget to take their meds, and no one remembers to show up for the support group meetings.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  10. 42 by Jhon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's my age. I do notice tt takes just a wee bit more effort to cram more stuff in my head than it used to. Other than that, I still enjoy my ability to recall ridicules bits of obscure minutia that when viewed in total aren't enough to get me a good job, but are just enough to be annoying.

    Seriously, though. My ability to commit stuff to memory and recall it *IS* one of my marketable skills. And anything that can help prolong the decline is welcome news.

    1. Re:42 by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      One of my concerns is that the things I'll remember into my twilight years are all the different passphrases I have to use at work. I still remember passwords I created in 1995.

    2. Re:42 by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's my age. I do notice it takes just a wee bit more effort to cram more stuff in my head than it used to. Other than that, I still enjoy my ability to recall ridiculous bits of obscure minutia that when viewed in total aren't enough to get me a good job, but are just enough to be annoying.

      Seriously, though. My ability to commit stuff to memory and recall it *IS* one of my marketable skills. And anything that can help postpone the decline is welcome news.

      Fixed that for you. Lemme guess... grammar and spelling aren't something you like committing to memory?

    3. Re:42 by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would say "way to be a jerk to the guy", but I figure he won't remember you doing it in 10 minutes anyway. ;-P

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    4. Re:42 by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      That's because you haven't changed them since 1995.

    5. Re:42 by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's my age.

      Don't panic.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I just found the answer to Life, the Universe and Everything.

    7. Re:42 by Kjella · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fail, "postpone the decline" is not a correction of "prolong the decline".

      If you previously lost some memory from 40 to 70 but with treatment lose the same memory from 40 to 90 you have prolonged the decline by 20 years. If you instead lose it from 60 to 90 you have postponed the decline by 20 years. In total given all the effects of aging, there will probably be some form of decline so the grandparent is likely more right than you too. Damn, I love zinging a grammar and spelling Nazi.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:42 by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Well played. I always love when someone tries being pedantic and fails, then gets burned for it. Well done, sir. Well done.

    9. Re:42 by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the starting and end points of memory are the same and just stretched out further, and that this treatment doesn't stop the decline in its tracks.

      The assumptions I made with my word choice are more in line with what the article showed as the effects of this treatment.

      Bazinga.

  11. coorelation != causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Just because you injected enzymes into the rats, doesn't mean that the enzymes caused the increased memory effect

    ok, ok, I'm joking. At least we got the stupid "coorelation != causation" comment out of the way early on.

    1. Re:coorelation != causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coorelation != causation

      You may be right, depending on what coorelation means to you (is this a malamanteau [deleted wikipedia citation] cuckoo and correlation/relation?). Hey even Firefox underlined that word!

    2. Re:coorelation != causation by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually it's co-orelation. Orelation is the raw material from which irony is made. That is, it's something which isn't quite irony, but out of which one could make irony. Co-orelation is when several people orelate together. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  12. No joke... by mollog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm hoping they can bring this to the public sooner rather than later. It's not funny when you can't remember stuff the way you used to, it's a little scary. I accept that it's part of getting older, but I don't accept it happily.

    --
    Best regards.
  13. Illegal alternative by by+(1706743) · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Illegal alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legal Alternative, you just have to have the guts to drink fish medicine.

    2. Re:Illegal alternative by DryGrian · · Score: 1

      Hey! I do live in Mendocino County, you insensitive.. uh... hey, want a popsicle?

      --
      For optimal comment enjoyment, take red pill now.
  14. memory? learning? by rcamans · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, now I know what switch instantly gets flipped to off when you first read slashdot...
    That explains a lot...

    --
    wake up and hold your nose
  15. Article is Also Phenomenal by Iskender · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd just like to point out that this is a good article:
    1. It's news for nerds.
    2. It goes into some technical detail (molecules named)
    3. It mentions both possible advantages and disadvantages of the approach.
    4. It has both reasonable amounts of text and a decent video. (read:content)

    Really, this is probably the kind of article people refer to when they're whining about other ones.

    I'd love some feedback from the people who go on about kdawson only posting crap, too. Is this crap? Or maybe you prefer to cherry-pick the bad articles instead to hate on the hated editor of the month/year?

    1. Re:Article is Also Phenomenal by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      I'd love some feedback from the people who go on about kdawson only posting crap, too. Is this crap? Or maybe you prefer to cherry-pick the bad articles instead to hate on the hated editor of the month/year?

      Clearly they have Alzheimer's :D.

    2. Re:Article is Also Phenomenal by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll link to your post here next time I see someone bitching about kdawson.

      Now, I need to go read the article you've successfully hyped..

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:Article is Also Phenomenal by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Hey, I get laid once out of every 12,000 tries too ... no one is going to sit around pointing at me like I'm a stud for it. Its just what happens when you do something over and over again, eventually the pattern breaks just out of randomness.

      I have excellent karma, not because I'm great at posting comments but because most people don't vote down, so the fact that I regularly run into the max posts per day limit means my karma goes up because one out of a hundred is thought to be good, which means I get a lot of good posts and the bad ones are ignored. Anyone posting as often as I do probably has good karma as well unless they really go out of their way to be a dick.

      kdawson is still a douche, even if once in a blue moon he approves something that actually is not dumber than a box of rocks.

      If he wouldn't have approved it, someone else would have. You're argument for him is pathetic.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:Article is Also Phenomenal by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Cherry picking bad kdawson articles is a non sequitur. A better analogy would be that his good articles are like needles in a haystack. A haystack made of raw sewage. With hand grenades in it.

      Sure, sometimes Uncle Fester looking freaks get to groom Felicia Day, but it's not a pattern.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Article is Also Phenomenal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're argument for him is pathetic.

      As is your spelling. Nice rant, though.

    6. Re:Article is Also Phenomenal by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Who reads TFA anyway? I didn’t even read TFS, the title or your comment. Slashdot is write-only. Didn’t you know?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:Article is Also Phenomenal by wye43 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it is a very good article.

  16. Do I really want to be aware of everything? by LivinInSanDiego · · Score: 1

    Seriously, do we really want to be fully aware of our suffering as we age and our mortality? Seems nature was doing us a favor by making us oblivious to our own demise.

    1. Re:Do I really want to be aware of everything? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      So said someone who hasn't seen both options in person.

      Do I want to live my last twenty years with diving bell syndrome? No. But I'd rather live them bad eyesight and an inability to walk than live them knowing my mental performance was degraded.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Do I really want to be aware of everything? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      But I'd rather live them bad eyesight and an inability to walk than live them knowing my mental performance was degraded.

      Living them with the ability to words out of sentences, though, I'm perfectly comfortable with.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:Do I really want to be aware of everything? by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      I've seen both.

      By far I'd pick the physical hell alone. Alzheimer patients get the joy of experiencing BOTH. They "wake up" for periods of time, and that waking up becomes a nightmare -- why am I old? Why can't I walk? Why do I hurt so horribly? Why am I alone? Why won't they let me go home?

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  17. I'm in my late 40s... by IANAAC · · Score: 3, Interesting
    and while I do notice it takes a bit more effort to learn something new, once I do I can retain it without problems, provided I use the knowledge.

    Languages have always interested me (it's what I do for a living these days), and every couple years I try to learn the basics of another language. I find that as long as I exercise the newly learned skill/material, I'm OK (such as reading newspapers in the other language, listening to broadcasts in that language, and finally speaking the language whenever I get the chance. I would imagine I'm using a different part of the brain for these activities, though.

    I'm certainly no expert, nor do I claim to know anything of how the mind works for that matter, but I can't help but think that actually using skills learned later in life helps.

    1. Re:I'm in my late 40s... by LivinInSanDiego · · Score: 1

      I'm in my late 30's and once I had kids my memory was shot. I personally think kids kill cells faster than age could ever do.

    2. Re:I'm in my late 40s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should hang out at a Youth Hostel. You'd find fun people whom speak many tounges.
      Most hostels don't mind locals visiting/volunteering at the Hostel. The small Hostels could use your talent too.

    3. Re:I'm in my late 40s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by your post indicating that you actively embrace other cultures, I would theorise that IANAAC stands for I Am Not An American Citizen.

    4. Re:I'm in my late 40s... by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Judging by your post indicating that you actively embrace other cultures, I would theorise that IANAAC stands for I Am Not An American Citizen.

      I'm American, through and through (living in the midwest, no less), but enjoy as much of the world as I'm able. Believe it or not, there are plenty of us in the US. We just don't get the airplay that the nutjobs do.

  18. And the enzyme is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By injecting an enzyme, the team 'flipped' the switch to its on position for older mice, giving them the memory and learning performance they'd enjoyed when they were young.

    The most important information is missing.

    1. Re:And the enzyme is? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      They forgot it. It's the age, you know?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  19. Some things are best left forgotten. by Anachragnome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some things are best left forgotten.

    Unless they can do this selectively, I'll pass. One gets to a certain age...well, the baggage seems to fade away yet the really good stuff remains clear.

    I think this is a good thing, and in my opinion quite possibly a natural function of the human mind--a defense mechanism, perhaps.

    1. Re:Some things are best left forgotten. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So all we need is technology which can selectively erase memories, like in the movie "Paycheck". Combined with this new memory enhancer, older people can enjoy youthful memories without all the painful ones!

    2. Re:Some things are best left forgotten. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should look forward to the day we get cyborg technology in our everyday lives. Backup your good memories to a server farm, and just delete the bad ones :)

    3. Re:Some things are best left forgotten. by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      (Disclaimer: I'm not a conspiracy theorist nut.)

      Well of course, that is what you want me to think!

      *flees down the corridor twitching at his tin foil suit with matching cumberbund*

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
  20. remembering passwords/phases from '85 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Actually, it's pretty easy for me to remember, I just used the same passwords/phrases/pin-numbers since 1985...
    Posting anon for obvious reasons ;^)

    1. Re:remembering passwords/phases from '85 by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me it's the same as the combination on my luggage!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  21. WHO MOVED MY CHEESE? by Huzzah! · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, I remember now...

    1. Re:WHO MOVED MY CHEESE? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      I remember how it started. I can't remember yesterday, I just remember doing what they told me.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  22. Silly humans by moteyalpha · · Score: 1

    It reminds me of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and the mice.
    If we develop a method to create super intelligence and test it on mice first, then they will recognise that fact and play dumb.

  23. Re:You're missing the benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make new friends every day, you're constantly seeing a lot of really great movies for the first time, and in lucid moments, you plan your escape because "things aren't as bad as the doctors are making them out to be"...

  24. I need this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I can recall where I lost my keys 20 years ago.

    Poor animals that went before these...

  25. This can only have positive results. by Minwee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nov 21 - I did a dumb thing today I forgot I wasnt in Miss Kinnians class at the adult center any more like I use to be. I went in and sat down in my old seat in the back of the room and she lookd at me funny and she said Charlie where have you been. So I said hello Miss Kinnian Im redy for my lessen today only I lossed the book we was using.

    1. Re:This can only have positive results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For people who might be curious, I believe this is from the marvelous book Flowers For Algernon.

    2. Re:This can only have positive results. by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      If you're going to quote "Flowers for Algernon" you should credit Daniel Keyes.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  26. Lie A Lot by mindbrane · · Score: 1

    Lying a lot helps a lot. Try, say, cheating on your S.O. with a disastrous divorce as a consequence and just keep track of all the particulars of the lies you tell. It's as much or more conditioning and impetus as it is genes.

    --
    ideopath @ play
  27. Simplistic solutions and inappropriate blame by syousef · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you're that young and already having memory problems (assuming you don't have a brain tumor or something), it's lifestyle related. Get out and exercise, eat well, there's probably some nutrient you're missing. Eat lot's of broccoli. Sleep enough. Don't under-estimate the brain wasting effects of alcohol or cocaine. I don't know you so I can't say exactly what your personal problem is.

    Fuck me! Not all human beings are the same and what's true for you might not necessarily be true for the parent. Suggesting that he eat some broccoli, and insinuating that he's got drug and alcohol problems is borderline criminal. He may have a medical condition like early onset Alzheimers. Correct thing to do if he's not just being melodramatic is to see on or more doctors.

    A lot of people, for example, don't eat enough vegetables. They'll eat a salad once a week or an apple every few days or something and hope that's good enough. It's not. You may not notice the effects right away, but over time they will add up as your body uses up its stored nutrients.

    A lot of people who have treated their bodies like SHIT have been sharp as a tack into their 70s and 80s. This idea that if someone has to be doing something wrong in order to have a medical issue belongs in the dark ages. Of course treating your body well will make the most of your situation, but that doesn't mean it'll work miracles.

    By the way try getting a full night's sleep, eating properly and excercising when you have a couple of kids under 2. a sick partner and a job that ties up 12 hours of your day 5 or 6 days a week. Or if you have a sleep disorder. Try excercising if you're overweight and have some kind of physical injury. The trouble with unhealthy is that a couple of issues can then lead to a spiral. This idea that someone can click their fingers and excercise some will power to get healthy is a luxurious dellusion only healthy people with too much spare time can afford. Not everyone is fresh out of college with no kids and a cushy job.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Simplistic solutions and inappropriate blame by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fuck me!

      I'd rather not.

      He may have a medical condition like early onset Alzheimers.

      Indeed, I specifically excluded people in that type of category.

      Try excercising if you're overweight and have some kind of physical injury. The trouble with unhealthy is that a couple of issues can then lead to a spiral. This idea that someone can click their fingers and excercise some will power to get healthy is a luxurious dellusion only healthy people with too much spare time can afford.

      I didn't say it was easy, but if they can't find a way to exercise and lose weight, they are going to suffer the consequences. I mean, this is nature: nature doesn't care if it's hard. Hopefully for them they will be one of the lucky people who doesn't see any negative health effects even though they are overweight and treat their body badly. But it's not likely.

      Incidentally, regarding the people who treat their bodies badly and still end up healthy, they usually have something else going on that balances it out. Like maybe they eat bacon every day, but they also eat spinach and get lots of exercise. Or maybe they party all night, but then balance it out by sleeping until the afternoon. It's rare to find people who truly abuse their bodies and don't end up paying for it.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Simplistic solutions and inappropriate blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe they party all night, but then balance it out by sleeping until the afternoon. It's rare to find people who truly abuse their bodies and don't end up paying for it.

      Failing to eat three servings per day of broccoli is not truly abusing your body. Truly abusing your body requires concerted effort. Body is exceptionally good at extracting its needs from whatever you give it - you can make it easier or harder, but it's difficult to hurt yourself with improper nutrients as long as you get enough calories. Eat Healthy is timeless advice, but the definition of healthy has been subject to scientific fads with about a 20 year cycle. "Healthy breakfast" in the 50s was 2-3 eggs, bacon, sausage, coffee, toast with butter and a four ounce shot of orange juice. "Healthy lunch" has been a half pound of salt pork and unleavened bread washed down with a quart of beer. I've no idea what "Healthy food" will be in 20 more years, but I'll be surprised if it's organically grown broccoli and bonito.

    3. Re:Simplistic solutions and inappropriate blame by syousef · · Score: 1

      Fuck me!

      I'd rather not.

      Figure of speech. I'd rather you didn't either.

      He may have a medical condition like early onset Alzheimers.

      Indeed, I specifically excluded people in that type of category.

      No you didn't. Even so it's the vast majority of people in that category. How many 40 year olds do you know that don't have any medical conditions at all?

      Try excercising if you're overweight and have some kind of physical injury. The trouble with unhealthy is that a couple of issues can then lead to a spiral. This idea that someone can click their fingers and excercise some will power to get healthy is a luxurious dellusion only healthy people with too much spare time can afford.

      I didn't say it was easy, but if they can't find a way to exercise and lose weight, they are going to suffer the consequences. I mean, this is nature: nature doesn't care if it's hard. Hopefully for them they will be one of the lucky people who doesn't see any negative health effects even though they are overweight and treat their body badly. But it's not likely.

      Not easy? Try not possible for many. Yes you suffer the consequences but requiring that some people make a superhuman effort to meet your standards is ridiculous.

      Incidentally, regarding the people who treat their bodies badly and still end up healthy, they usually have something else going on that balances it out. Like maybe they eat bacon every day, but they also eat spinach and get lots of exercise. Or maybe they party all night, but then balance it out by sleeping until the afternoon. It's rare to find people who truly abuse their bodies and don't end up paying for it.

      What a complete load of BS. How many Hollywood drug addled boze ridden idiots only suffer the medical consequences of their stupidity when they accidentally overdose and end up "tragically" dead? I don't think a lot of those kinds of people do much to balance it out. Your belief in this fair kind of world where you're to blame if you have issues is well and truly a fantasy.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:Simplistic solutions and inappropriate blame by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      How many Hollywood drug addled boze ridden idiots only suffer the medical consequences of their stupidity when they accidentally overdose and end up "tragically" dead? I don't think a lot of those kinds of people do much to balance it out.

      Very clearly they don't balance it out. That's why they end up dead.

      Try not possible for many. Yes you suffer the consequences but requiring that some people make a superhuman effort to meet your standards is ridiculous.

      OK, it sucks for those people that it's not possible for. But it's not like they are going to escape the consequences of being inactive just because they are stuck in the wheelchair. Obviously if someone is only limited because they have low willpower, the thing they need to work on is getting more willpower.

      --
      Qxe4
    5. Re:Simplistic solutions and inappropriate blame by syousef · · Score: 1

      OK, it sucks for those people that it's not possible for. But it's not like they are going to escape the consequences of being inactive just because they are stuck in the wheelchair. Obviously if someone is only limited because they have low willpower, the thing they need to work on is getting more willpower.

      Interesting that you should mention people in wheelchairs. Not too many of them actually have weight issues. Hauling your weight around in one of those things probably does burn energy, but still they can't do anything you'd call excercise. Not too many of them have to look after children and work 12+ hour days either. Stil if a sedentary lifestyle was all that it took you'd expect them to almost all be fat and dead at 30.

      There are very real differences in makeup, metabolism, apetite and circumstance between people. Insisting that you're right to just blame it on a weak will is indefensible. You just don't get how lucky you are.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:Simplistic solutions and inappropriate blame by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Try excercising if you're overweight and have some kind of physical injury. The trouble with unhealthy is that a couple of issues can then lead to a spiral. This idea that someone can click their fingers and excercise some will power to get healthy is a luxurious dellusion only healthy people with too much spare time can afford.

      I didn't say it was easy, but if they can't find a way to exercise and lose weight, they are going to suffer the consequences. I mean, this is nature: nature doesn't care if it's hard. Hopefully for them they will be one of the lucky people who doesn't see any negative health effects even though they are overweight and treat their body badly. But it's not likely.

      Not easy? Try not possible for many. Yes you suffer the consequences but requiring that some people make a superhuman effort to meet your standards is ridiculous.

      For the past year I've started going 3 times a week to a nearby county gym at lunchtime. The county gives free membership to seniors, so 80% of the other people in there are old. Some of them are overweight, a lot of them seem to have health problems; often they're just slowly pedaling a stationary bike, slowly walking the treadmill, or sitting on an exercise ball. The important thing is, though, they're doing *something*, and over time that's better than doing nothing. It's not a superhuman effort, and it's certainly possible for almost everyone - if you can leave the house to work, you can do some exercise. Hell, even just taking the stairs rather than the elevator can help, but lots of people won't even take that small step. You just have to make it part of your routine, which is the real hard part for most people.

    7. Re:Simplistic solutions and inappropriate blame by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Stil if a sedentary lifestyle was all that it took you'd expect them to almost all be fat and dead at 30.

      There aren't very many people who die from a sedentary lifestyle by age 30.

      There are very real differences in makeup, metabolism, apetite and circumstance between people. Insisting that you're right to just blame it on a weak will is indefensible. You just don't get how lucky you are.

      I didn't blame it on a weak will. In fact I didn't blame it on anything. I don't even care about blame. You don't know how lucky I am either, how I've had to personally build up will-power.

      But it doesn't matter. If you are sedentary, eat poorly, and don't sleep right, there are scientific studies that show bad things will happen. It's not a matter of opinion, and it doesn't matter why. Nature doesn't care.

      --
      Qxe4
    8. Re:Simplistic solutions and inappropriate blame by syousef · · Score: 1

      I didn't blame it on a weak will. In fact I didn't blame it on anything. I don't even care about blame. You don't know how lucky I am either, how I've had to personally build up will-power.

      But it doesn't matter. If you are sedentary, eat poorly, and don't sleep right, there are scientific studies that show bad things will happen. It's not a matter of opinion, and it doesn't matter why. Nature doesn't care.

      You have been able to do it. Hence you are lucky. Others have not been able to despite their best efforts and fools like you just put them down as weak willed. Nature may not care but that doesn't mean we should be assholes to people who find it hard or even assume that just because we can do it others aren't trying hard enough.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    9. Re:Simplistic solutions and inappropriate blame by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You have been able to do it.

      Unless a person has a broken leg, or cancer or some other physical deformity, they are able to do it. Maybe they haven't figured out how to do it yet, or maybe they are lazy (heck, who isn't?), or maybe they just don't want to, but it isn't a question of ability. It's not like it's fun for anyone starting out, in fact, it's fairly miserable for everyone, I think. Once you get the hang of it though, once you feel the joy of pushing yourself, and seeing yourself grow stronger, it becomes worth the effort. I am not sure it ever becomes easy, for anyone, to exercise, but because you understand how great it is to push your limits, and because you've grown stronger, it becomes easier. You've become more than you thought possible, and that is such an amazing feeling.

      In my experience, I've identified two different pains: one is the pain of your body being tired, and worn out; this is a pain you should pay attention to and rest. The other pain is the pain of laziness that comes up any time you do anything different, really. It can be quite strong at times, but it should be ignored and beaten down with a passion, otherwise it will handicap you. Even if all you do is step outside and walk 5 steps, then come back inside, at least you've done something. You've beaten the laziness pain, and it gets easier the more you do it. This is how you build up will power. If you can't even build up the will-power to step outside, try walking across your room and back. Or just stand up and sit down a few times. Start with whatever you can, then build up. But do something.

      If the real problem is just low will-power, the solution is to build will-power. Sometimes being born with natural will-power isn't so good: I know this guy who just throws himself into everything as hard as he can, but he doesn't really think about what he is doing, so from my perspective it just looks like he is beating his head against the wall. To run faster, for example, he will try to put more effort, and he starts breathing really hard, but he doesn't think about how to run more efficiently. So in the end he bounces up and down, putting all that energy into the up/down movement when it could be better spent pushing him forward. I try to get him to slow down and think about what he is doing, but so far it hasn't worked.

      --
      Qxe4
  28. Rosebud... by rockNme2349 · · Score: 1

    it was his FTP password. There. I spoiled the movie.

    --
    Sewage Treatment Facilities - "Our duty is clear."
  29. Are you speaking from experience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I'm almost 50 and have healthier eating, exercising, and sleeping habits than probably 90% of the geeks on /. and I can tell you that I definitely notice a loss of memory and brain function from when I was in my 30's.

    Being healthy might minimize the effects, but it definitely does not prevent it from happening entirely.

  30. Great by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    It wasn't like the fucking rodents weren't gaining the upper hand again already. Now were going to make them smarter. They damn near took over 700 years ago with the plague thing, but we beat them back. Now were going to help them remember more? Shit, it'll be like dealing with the Rat Things in Starman's Son; furry vermin with spears and the racial memory of millions of rat traps and kids with .22s.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:Great by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Look up the memory elixer their giving to the bomb sniffing bees

  31. Is this a really a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some aspects of my youth that I care not to remember...

  32. get molecularly distilled dha, No mercury/cadmium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    you can get molecularly distilled fish oil, this has the heavy metals and pcb's/bromo-blah's etc removed. and it can be very cheap so price is no excuse. in fact ive used several brands of fish oils for over a decade and feel that ive noticed a significant difference between the quality of different brands.

    on the price issue, you can get capsules that dont mention any distillation or any heavy metal levels or such, from your supermarket and this is what most people buy because of convenience. easy to swallow a capsule and you dont have to be concerned with the taste of the fish oil. but i highly recommend against this.

    i recommend buying a liquid oil getting it sent from a wholesaler so you know its fresh (and hasnt been sitting on a shelf for 1year+) then keeping the bottle in your fridge, and taking spoonfuls when you dose, but otherwise keeping it in the fridge. remember the good oils go rancid, so i treat the photo-oxidation and thermal issue seriously.

    i am going to plug a couple of brands. Firstly, Melrose, http://www.melrosehealth.com.au/, is awesome and really cheap, cheaper than the bulk supermarket stuff and infinitely more efficacious. I now see from their website that they have a new product, the 18/12 fish oil, i used to buy their cod liver oil so my comments regarding the possibility of being limited by the level of vitA was directed towards the cod liver oil product. i havnt actually tried their 18/12 fish oil, but it looks good, i guess they had to keep up with the competition.

    then, slightly more expensive but i feel its well worth it to get the top quality, there is Metagenics, specifically, Ultra Dha/epa distillates, https://www.metagenics.com.au/shop/index.cfm?fuseaction=item&id=602 , this is personally what i recommend. there are a couple of reasons.

    if you just take cod liver oil, its easy to overdose on vitamin A. i find the amount of vitA is a limit on the amount of oil you can take and also find too much vitA makes me flushed and hyper and it feels unpleasant. look up vitA overdose, it is certainly detrimental.

    The ultra dha product above is mostly just dha, so you dont have to worry about overdosing on vitA, and it allows you to get an effective dose with only a few ml's, it turns out that dha is only a few percentage as a constituent of most fish oils, so you would need to take 50ml or so of most fish oil to actually get an effective dose of dha(depending on your needs/reasons for supplementing (are you taking it for cardovascular=eps, neuro=dha))

  33. acidosis to fungal imbalance, CancerIsFungus.Com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine is a veterinarian, and he says that animals have been getting the same health complications as humans all since feeding the animals processed mashed corn rather than graze them naturally on herbs.

    Makes you wonder about all the biproducts passing on ingredients, like Silicon Dioxide and food colorings.

  34. cycling! by Herve5 · · Score: 1

    seconded.
    And if like me you're living in a place which is not flat, go for an electric bike.
    Flattens all climbs (if you choose >=400W), same effort when flat if you just flip a switch... and indeed you can commute with it for distances up to 15-20 Km.

    --
    Herve S.
  35. maybe we don't remember for a reason... by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I actually have great memory recall from my childhood, but it seems to me maybe thats good people forget things.

    It's how we deal with life and move on.

    What I'd rather they figure out is how to keep your short term memory intact.

    oh, that doesn't involve: not smoking weed.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  36. Re:get molecularly distilled dha, No mercury/cadmi by MoeDumb · · Score: 1, Informative

    One shouldn't take _any_ supplemental Vit A as it blocks the infintely more important Vit D. See the Vitamin D Council dot org. If I had them I'd toss some mod points your way. Good post.

    --
    Mod Me Up. You'll make a grown man cry.
  37. Oh I hope so... by veeoh · · Score: 1

    39 now and starting to notice memory issues.

    Bring on the drugs!

  38. whooooosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may be worse when you are tired or in bad shape, but some people are not made for learning by heart. I had a hell of a time learning multiplication tables (for example) while all other learning-related tasks has been easy before and after that.

  39. 3309 by pepax · · Score: 1

    While I don't remember my current phone number, I still remember my family's phone number back from when I was 6 years old. But maybe it has something to do with the fact that it was just 4 digits: 3309. The year was 1979, and we lived in what was then the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic.

    1. Re:3309 by Jhon · · Score: 1

      Heh... I remember the phone numbers of friends I had when I was 7-12 years old. But I can't remember their names... Go figure.

  40. Flipped off by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    This is fantastic! This is the second most important thing I'd like to have with a switch flipped to "young".

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  41. What else is on that gene? by JTsyo · · Score: 1

    I would be concerned with what other functions are connected to that gene. You wouldn't want your memory restored but then find that you can't digest proteins or something.

  42. I was going to post a reply by naris · · Score: 0

    But I forgot what it was....

  43. Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I was hoping he'd forget that whole "cheese incident..."