Slashdot Mirror


Benchmark Software For Windows 7 Rollout?

tdisalvo writes "We are doing a Windows 7 rollout and I will have to compare major PC vendors. I am looking for vendor-neutral tests that will give me the data I need to present an educated opinion to my CIO. Clear, pretty charts are nice since it is for C level execs, and we need to make it understandable for nontechnical as well as technical people. More specifically, I am looking for something that will clearly show how the same processor performs (better or worse) with a particular build, motherboard, RAM, power supply, etc. My plan is to get very similar machines from major vendors and see which one's build has the highest independent benchmarks. Something with which I could test multiple computers and report on the differences in score would be ideal." As usual, free is an advantage.

3 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. Authority by White+Flame · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Questions:
    A. Do have the authority to make the decision?
    B. Are you tasked with giving him your "expert opinion" on the matter?
    C. Are you tasked to actually educate him enough about a technical decision that he has no technical skills to currently evaluate an answer?

    Answers:
    A. Evaluate on the specs you know are important on the job, give him a specific brand, and say "trust me, buy these"
    B. Evaluate on the specs you know are important on the job, give him a specific brand, and say "trust me, buy these"
    C. You're boned.

  2. Barking up the wrong tree by whomeyup · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Performance? Really? Personally I'd want stability, reliability, and top notch support. Your average computer user loses far more productivity from downtime due to cheap hardware dying, unstable drivers, etc than to their machine starting (insert app of your choice) .2 seconds slower. I want to be able to order an exact replacement 2 years down the road if a machine dies. I want replacement parts available for the forseeable lifetime of the machines on which I standardize.

  3. Re:Multiple software produces the best result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a waste of time and effort. Firstly some machines will perform better on some benchmarks than others. Secondly there are costs, availability, configuration, reliability and many other factors to evaluate. Its hard to believe you are going to look at a few percent performance differences (if that much). After all, PCs are practically the definition of a commodity market. You might be better off picking the machines with the best paint jobs. You ought to get a job at the Pentagon where they specialize in meaningless power point slides.