Slashdot Mirror


Mark Twain To Reveal All After 100 Year Wait

Hugh Pickens writes "The Independent reports that one of Mark Twain's dying wishes is at last coming true: an extensive, outspoken and revelatory autobiography which he devoted the last decade of his life to writing is finally going to be published one hundred years after his death. Twain, the pen name of Samuel Clemens, left behind 5,000 unedited pages of memoirs when he died in 1910, together with handwritten notes saying that he did not want them to hit bookshops for at least a century, but in November, the University of California, Berkeley, where the manuscript is in a vault, will release the first volume of Mark Twain's three-volume autobiography. Scholars are divided as to why Twain wanted his autobiography kept under wraps for so long, with some believing it was because he wanted to talk freely about issues such as religion and politics. Michael Shelden, who this year published Man in White, an account of Twain's final years, says that some of his privately held views could have hurt his public image. 'He had doubts about God, and in the autobiography, he questions the imperial mission of the US in Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines,' says Shelden. 'He's also critical of [Theodore] Roosevelt, and takes the view that patriotism was the last refuge of the scoundrel. Twain also disliked sending Christian missionaries to Africa. He said they had enough business to be getting on with at home: with lynching going on in the South, he thought they should try to convert the heathens down there.' Interestingly enough, Twain had a cunning plan to beat the early 20th century copyright law with its short copyright terms. Twain planned to republish every one of his works the moment it went out of copyright with one-third more content, hoping that availability of such 'premium' version will make prints based on the out-of-copyright version less desirable on the market."

38 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. Adding to the Speculation by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He had doubts about God ...

    Indeed. See his later books like Letters from the Earth and The Mysterious Stranger Manuscripts (claymation here).

    Twain also disliked sending Christian missionaries to Africa.

    Oh I think that's putting it rather lightly. After reading about Twain's efforts to in King Leopold's Ghost, I read Twain's King Leopold's Soliloquy: A Defense of His Congo Rule in which Twain rips the Belgian King Leopold II apart (in my opinion the farce Twain made of Leopold is better than the more direct Crime of the Congo by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle). We seem to think that human rights and anthropology are modern day efforts when historically artists like Twain were very politically active and quite in tune with the truths of corrupt governments (the United States notwithstanding).

    I assure you that in Twain's mind at the time of his death, he had many issues that he held from his writings -- most likely because he felt we weren't ready for that level of truth yet. Really the only question for me is whether or not he still felt the need to drench these memoirs in satire and wit when a hundred years from then he can just out and out straight to your face tell you what he feels as he recounts his life. I'd imagine he knew that saying some of this stuff one hundred years ago would be career ending or life threatening ... and not until those involved, lampooned and criticized are long gone would the world be ready for this. This will most likely prove to be a delicious read indeed.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Adding to the Speculation by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mark Twain had to have been one of the coolest guys who ever lived.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Adding to the Speculation by bigredradio · · Score: 4, Informative

      On the surface. Apparently he was a poor husband and neglectful father (It was in some documentary on PBS I saw years ago. Maybe Ken Burns.)

    3. Re:Adding to the Speculation by sznupi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whatever the substantive motives for the delay in publication are - that's probably also a nice publicity stunt; viral marketing is...old again?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:Adding to the Speculation by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are plenty of good husbands and good fathers in this world. There are very few writers of his calibre however. Saying that he was only a great man on the surface because he wasn't a great family man is like saying Alan Turing wasn't all that great because he was rubbish at water polo*.

      For all I know Alan Turing was great at water polo, my point is that it is irrelevant.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    5. Re:Adding to the Speculation by AGMW · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's no reference to water polo in his biographer's homepage.

      Most probably because his prowess was such that any mention would steer the biography away from the purely "math guy" approach.

      As I understand it Alan Turing did try water polo once but he pleaded with the powers the be that the sorrowful occasion be omitted from all records as it was such an unmitigated disaster. The horse drowned.

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    6. Re:Adding to the Speculation by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are plenty of good husbands and good fathers in this world. There are very few writers of his calibre however.

      And these sets seem to have less overlap than simply statistics would suggest. Genius, and devotion to the pursuit of where that genius leads them, often result in someone who has many problems in other areas of life. Hell, just artists and writers in general whether genius or not tend to have these kinds of problems.

      In other news, while Vincent Van Gogh may appear to have been a brilliant artist, did you know that in reality he was basically a raving lunatic not to mention quite an asshole? Yep, it's true. All those emotions you felt looking at Starry Night were actually invalid. Who knew? Science did, that's who.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:Adding to the Speculation by CannonballHead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are plenty of good husbands and good fathers in this world. There are very few writers of his calibre however. Saying that he was only a great man on the surface because he wasn't a great family man is like saying Alan Turing wasn't all that great because he was rubbish at water polo*.

      Not really. I know very few people that measure a man's greatness based on his water polo skills. But if you're not a good husband and father to the people you promised to be a good husband and father to, then you have lost a significant amount of respect from me.

      If we said he was a "great writer," that's fine. But calling him a great man because of his writing is not merited, unless as a society, we actually want to ignore "humanity" faults in a person because of his literary work. Personally, I'd much rather have a great guy (great "man") as my neighbor than a great writer.

      With all that said, I don't know much about him as a person, so I don't know if the original claim is true or not :)

    8. Re:Adding to the Speculation by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Saying that he was only a great man on the surface because he wasn't a great family man is like saying Alan Turing wasn't all that great because he was rubbish at water polo*.

      Plenty of kids and neighborhoods are all the worse because of negligent/never_there fathers. No one grew up harmed because someone wasn't a good water polo player.

    9. Re:Adding to the Speculation by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How many lives has he touched with his brilliant writing? His writings have had an unmeasurable positive impact on the world and to ignore that seems almost criminal to me. "Just a great writer" does not really do justice to how good he was. His works aren't just nice stories, they are full of powerful and relevant social commentary as well, which was not lost on his readers at the time.

      I'm not attempting to downplay the harm caused by being a negligent father but everyone has flaws. If we ignore the achievements of men because of their supposed shortfallings in other areas, then nobody is a great man, and what exactly does that say about society? And for what it is worth, he publicly stated on at least one occation that he supported extended copyright terms because it would allow his work to financially support his family after his death. Perhaps he wasn't a great father/husband, but it certainly doesn't sound like he created enough harm to outway his literary and intellectual accomplishments.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    10. Re:Adding to the Speculation by Ltap · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ultimately, it's a question of priority. People have to sacrifice their family life and hobbies to concentrate on their great work, which is why so many writers have had terrible lives. It's better that Twain gave us something that will last us through the ages (his words) than to have been another generic family man.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    11. Re:Adding to the Speculation by Eil · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think I read that one, but the only line that I can remember from it is, "a miserable pile of secrets."

    12. Re:Adding to the Speculation by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really. He likely wanted anyone he was talking ABOUT to be dead as well, to not be able to deny or discount his story. Basically, it would seem as if he is simply letting history speak for himself, and before you read this, a several generations have already been exposed to his more public side (his work) before they can judge his opinions and perspectives as a private individual. Most people have opinions that they don't necessarily share to everyone in public, be they about race, religion, politics, etc., particularly if they are not in the majority in these views.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    13. Re:Adding to the Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If we ignore the achievements of men because of their supposed shortfallings in other areas, then nobody is a great man, and what exactly does that say about society?

      The truth?

    14. Re:Adding to the Speculation by ak3ldama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Just a great writer" does not really do justice to how good he was.

      Yes it does. That is exactly what it means, he was a great writer. If he was a bad husband and father then that is what it is also.

      And for what it is worth, he publicly stated on at least one occation that he supported extended copyright terms because it would allow his work to financially support his family after his death.

      So he wants to try to play games with copyright law and you're ok with that too? Next you're going to tell me he created the modern text book scheme with new editions so often that students cannot reuse old text books...

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
  2. Republishing and copyright by nolife · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Twain planned to republish every one of his works the moment it went out of copyright with one-third more content, hoping that availability of such 'premium' version will make prints based on the out-of-copyright version less desirable on the market."

    Exactly why the limits SHOULD be less then they are now. Back then, the length of the copyright period was actually promoting the publishing of new material.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  3. That is a pretty good quote by bigredradio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel

    Especially when discussing the Patriot Act. Just saying.

    1. Re:That is a pretty good quote by Jake73 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Penned by Samuel Johnson, actually. Not sure if the Shelden got his Samuels mixed up or if he was just saying that Clemens shared the thought that originated with Johnson.

      But yea. Good quote.

    2. Re:That is a pretty good quote by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I actually disagree with the quote. My observation is that patriotism is the first refuge of the scoundrel. Just look at how many current politicians try to wrap themselves in the flag. When people are attacking their opponents for not wearing a flag lapel pin, I take it as a direct admission that the attacker doesn't actually have anything of substance to contribute.

  4. Wow! Just... wow! by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Twain planned to republish every one of his works the moment it went out of copyright with one-third more content, hoping that availability of such 'premium' version will make prints based on the out-of-copyright version less desirable on the market."

    If he was actually writing that additional content afterwards, he invented Release Early, Release Often.

    If the content actually existed and it was a cynical ploy to sell more products, he invented the model Microsoft uses.

    In either case, this puts his business acumen over half a century ahead of anyone else. That's genius.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Wow! Just... wow! by gzipped_tar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sadly he didn't secure a business model patent.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  5. For the record, his stance on copyright by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Informative

    from a speech which he gave before Congress:

    http://www.bpmlegal.com/cotwain.html

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:For the record, his stance on copyright by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I like that extension of copyright life to the author's life and fifty years afterward. I think that would satisfy any reasonable author, because it would take care of his children."

      Sorry Mr. Twain but I don't think your daughters should be able to live in luxury, without working, while they collect money off your books for another 50 years. If you want to pass your existing money to them, that's fine, but the copyright should end the moment you die. Let your daughters go-out and work for themselves if they want to continue collecting money.

      Copyright is intended to benefit the original laborer, not to set up an eternal money-making machine for people who did not do the original labor.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:For the record, his stance on copyright by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

      A reason that copyright extends past death is to discourage murder to get access to copyrighted material.

      That sounds more like a movie-plot risk than a serious concern.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:For the record, his stance on copyright by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A reason that copyright extends past death is to discourage murder to get access to copyrighted material.

      Here's the choice:

      1) Expiration at death -> Murder to put something into the public domain where EVERYBODY has access to it.
      2) Expiration after death -> Murder by a family member to get control of the income from the copyright today

      Seems to me that copyright extending past death is much more of an incentive for murder than it is against it.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  6. A hundred years by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please don't read the rest of this post until a hundred years after I'm dead.

    -----No reading below this point-----

    You all suck.

    Cheers,

    -----No reading above this point (in case you're reading this upside down while you drive in circles with an IPad on the steering wheel).-----

    1. Re:A hundred years by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 5, Funny

      I picked up my monitor and rotated it around.

      Screw you too.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  7. Not all that exciting or new really. by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From what I've been reading, all this material has been available for a long time to anyone who wanted to visit the library that holds it, and multiple biographies and even "autobiographies" have been published using information from it.

    So there are unlikely to be any shocking new revelations here.

    People will just get a chance to read things in his own words rather than the paraphrasing of a biographer.

    G.

  8. The truth comes out! by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

    We finally get to hear his side of the story of meeting Guinan and Data.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  9. Mark, meet George by dafz1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Twain planned to republish every one of his works the moment it went out of copyright with one-third more content, hoping that availability of such 'premium' version will make prints based on the out-of-copyright version less desirable on the market."

    So George Lucas didn't come up with this first. Not that it makes it ok.

    1. Re:Mark, meet George by Loadmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but Twain was trying to increase the value of the work not decrease it.

  10. Olden days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the olden days, authors games the law; they may not like the law, but still obeys the letters of the law. Today publishers BUY the law; they write them and their politicians force them upon the populace.

  11. Re:alternatively... by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I imagine if that were the case, massive numbers of readers would boycott Davinci Code. Although, is that really any different from how series like Babylon 5, Lost, and Stargate SG1 operate? You don't get the whole story at once... it's stretched out over 5-8 years.

    Also: I think you misinterpreted Twain's point. He didn't "hold back" anything in his stories. He was simply planning to add more material, as a bonus. Since he died, that never happened.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  12. Re:alternatively... by natehoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That would actually work well, since it would not protect the version as released, only the additions to the work. People can still freely use the old version as-is, or even as a basis for their own derivative works.

    If you want to continue profiting from your intellectual property, release a new version every few years that's better than the one you released before. People can then choose between the older version (which is free of copyright encumbrance) or the newer version (which you've put work into to make it more desirable than the old version). Just make sure you do it better than anyone else, because the instant copyright runs out anyone can use it as the basis for new art.

    This is the way it should be. If you want to keep getting paid for something you wrote 50 years ago, then you should keep working on it and improving it. Your older versions (for what is not currently, and should be, a reasonable definition of "older") should be available for everyone after you've had a reasonable amount of time to profit from it. "Years" is reasonable. "Generations" is not.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  13. The politicians sold you a line of BS there by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A reason that copyright extends past death is to discourage murder to get access to copyrighted material.

    I'm sure that's the spin policymakers put on it when they deformed copyright law. A better approach to discouraging murder would be to have set copyright terms...which coincidentally, was what we used to have. It used to be you could tell if a work was in copyright or not by looking at the copyright notice, subtracting it from the current year, and seeing if the result was greater than the copyright term. If you want the equivalent of "life plus fifty years" to benefit the kids, make copyright equal to the median life span + 50 years, and make that the set term. If you want more innovation, reduce that back to something reasonable, like 20 years.

    Making copyright life+50 to avoid a mass of murdered authors is bullshit...that problem goes away as soon as you decouple copyright from an author's demise, as was its original implementation (in the US at least...in the UK, the earliest forms of proto-copyright went on forever, and some works still fall in the category).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  14. As a competitor to Bill Gates, Mark Twain failed by Latent+Heat · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Mark Twain aka Samuel Clemens was a person who came from a humble background and married into wealth, but his appetite for the fine things that money could bring exceeded whatever came his way by way of his wife's family.

    Having worked as a newspaper "printer's devil", he saw his path to the riches required for the life style to which he had become accustomed in the Paige Compositor -- essentially a Victorian Era version of MS-Word implemented largely in hardware, making "leveraged" investments in this invention.

    The Paige compositor failed in the marketplace, more sophisticated than its competitor the Linotype -- kind of like the tale of a "death march" failed software or computer hardware project some 100 years later. Twain lost all of his money and then money he didn't have. To make good on his debts, he went on a worldwide lecture tool, essentially doing impressions of Hal Holbrooke pretending to be Mark Twain.

    Not only did the speaking fees from this grueling tour pay back his debts in full and then some, it made him immortal. Were it not for the fame of the speaking tour and connecting with audiences around the world with his personal appearances in a day before TV and cable and talk shows, he may as well been forgetten as many a 19'th century humorist.

    So remember, what made Mark Twain a household word even into the 21'st Century was one, the man's greed, and two, an antecedant to the personal computer.

  15. Re:As a competitor to Bill Gates, Mark Twain faile by mr_mischief · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He also invented that little tie on the back of a men's dress vest that brings it in around the waist and was awarded a patent for it, but to no monetary gain. It originally had uses on other garments as patented and was sometimes detachable, but it's still there on many suit vests.

    He also patented a self-pasting scrapbook which did sell really well and a trivia game.

  16. Re:As a competitor to Bill Gates, Mark Twain faile by thomst · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mark Twain aka Samuel Clemens was a person who came from a humble background and married into wealth, but his appetite for the fine things that money could bring exceeded whatever came his way by way of his wife's family.

    Having worked as a newspaper "printer's devil", he saw his path to the riches required for the life style to which he had become accustomed in the Paige Compositor -- essentially a Victorian Era version of MS-Word implemented largely in hardware, making "leveraged" investments in this invention.

    The Paige compositor failed in the marketplace, more sophisticated than its competitor the Linotype -- kind of like the tale of a "death march" failed software or computer hardware project some 100 years later. Twain lost all of his money and then money he didn't have. To make good on his debts, he went on a worldwide lecture tool, essentially doing impressions of Hal Holbrooke pretending to be Mark Twain.

    Not only did the speaking fees from this grueling tour pay back his debts in full and then some, it made him immortal. Were it not for the fame of the speaking tour and connecting with audiences around the world with his personal appearances in a day before TV and cable and talk shows, he may as well been forgetten as many a 19'th century humorist.

    So remember, what made Mark Twain a household word even into the 21'st Century was one, the man's greed, and two, an antecedant to the personal computer.

    Uh ... no, not really. Not at all, in fact.

    True, Twain put most the considerable wealth he had gained into the development of the Compositor (he himself estimated he spent $150,000 on it, but his biographer A. B. Paine estimated his investment at $190,000, and his friend William Dean Howells put the figure at $3000,000 - and these estimate are all in 19th century dollars). He believed there was both a demand and a need for it, based on his early career as a printer's devil. It did not "fail in the marketplace", however. In fact, only two prototypes were ever built, and the machine "collapsed" prior to its only demonstration before a group of investors in 1890.

    It wasn't greed that motivated him. Like modern Internet billionaires investing in private space travel, he believed in the technology, and put his money where his mouth was.

    As for the allegations of his being a "poor husband and neglectful father", nothing could be further from the truth. He adored his wife Livy, worshipped his daughters, and was devastated when his only son Langdon died of diptheria at age two. It was at Livy's insistence that he undertook a worldwide lecture tour to repay 100 cents on the dollar of the debts from his various bad investments (Paige's Compositor wasn't the only one), particularly the collapse of his publishing house, The Charles L. Webster Company. And, after their daughter Susy died of meningitis on a visit to their mansion in Hartford, Connecticut while Twain was on tour in Europe, he and Livy were so overcome with grief that they were never able to bring themselves to return to Hartford.

    "Poor husband and neglectful father?" I don' theeng so, Quickstraw ...

    --
    Check out my novel.