Slashdot Mirror


Google PAC-MAN Cost 4.8M Person-Hours

The folks at Rescue-Time, who make software that helps you (and companies) figure out how you spend your online time, did a modest calculation based on their user base and concluded that Google's playable PAC-MAN doodle cost the world over 4.8 million person-hours of productivity last Friday. "Google PAC-MAN consumed 4,819,352 hours of time (beyond the 33.6M daily man hours of attention that Google Search gets in a given day). $120,483,800 is the dollar tally, if the average Google user has a cost of $25/hr. (note that cost is 1.3 – 2.0 X pay rate). For that same cost, you could hire all 19,835 Google employees, from Larry and Sergey down to their janitors, and get six weeks of their time." Also, Google made the doodle permanent.

5 of 332 comments (clear)

  1. hour of pac-man != hour of lost productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is like all those bogus RIAA/MPAA/etc.-funded studies that assume a pirated copy is a lost sale. Much of the time spent on Google's PAC-MAN would otherwise have been spent on other internet time-wasting, not on productivity.

  2. What about urination? by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How much did people urinating cost?

  3. Re:In other words by ink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The free market can't exist without government regulations.

    You earned your +1 Indignant mod though. Congrats! :-)

    --
    The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
  4. 10 significant digits. by linuxwrangler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suggest that Mr. Tony Wright learn a thing or two about significant digits. What a glorious heap of bull to take input like "if we assume our userbase is representative", "if we take Wolfram Alpha at its word","approximate cost of", "about 11,000" and then assert a figure like $298,803,988. 10 significant digits?!? Right.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  5. Re:Competition by XanC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would say the irrational thing is to draw a female fireman, whatever the reason.