Slashdot Mirror


The "Scientific Impotence" Excuse

chichilalescu writes "I've had the feeling for a long time that people refuse to listen to scientists. The following is from an article on Ars Technica: 'It's hardly a secret that large segments of the population choose not to accept scientific data because it conflicts with their predefined beliefs: economic, political, religious, or otherwise. But many studies have indicated that these same people aren't happy with viewing themselves as anti-science, which can create a state of cognitive dissonance. That has left psychologists pondering the methods that these people use to rationalize the conflict. A study published in the Journal of Applied Social Psychology [abstract here] takes a look at one of these methods, which the authors term "scientific impotence" — the decision that science can't actually address the issue at hand properly.' The study found that 'regardless of whether the information presented confirmed or contradicted [the subjects'] existing beliefs, all of them came away from the reading with their beliefs strengthened."

11 of 892 comments (clear)

  1. The most interesting part is by logjon · · Score: 5, Funny

    That the study was done entirely on slashdot posts.

    --
    The stories and info posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
    Only fools would take it as fact.
  2. Hogwash by fimion · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article is clearly wrong, and my beliefs have been strengthened.

  3. Science is a Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The idea that science can answer questions about reality is itself a religion. For example, you cannot see atoms and you cannot see the big bang, evolution or even global warming and yet billions of people mindlessly believe these ythings without question simply on the authority of the left wing "science" touting powerful and wealthy elite.

  4. It's time to stop worrying by bugs2squash · · Score: 3, Funny

    why people don't believe demonstrable facts, and instead concentrate on how we can exploit that. The churches figured this all out centuries ago, surely the scientific community can too.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  5. Oh yeah, well????!!! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Funny

    How do supporters of this preposterous, so called, "scientific impotence theory" account for the fact that Science produces the world's entire supply of Viagra?

    Scientia potestas est, and sometimes it is willing to share...

  6. This just in... by nlawalker · · Score: 3, Funny

    This just in... stupid people aren't happy when they realize they're stupid. Full story at 11.

  7. Just one thing... by deepershade · · Score: 1, Funny

    Whilst this entire story is being inundated with the usual 'attack religion' comments that slashdot spews out like my arse after a curry, I do want to raise a few points in this debate.

    That is that quite simple, all sides of the climate change camp (as that is what this thread is about, even if the summary avoided mentioning it directly) are equally as guilty of blind faith.

    The Business side will refuse any concept which jeopardises their profit margins
    The Religious side will refuse any concept which does not match their religious texts
    The Politic side will refuse any concept which is unlikely to get them elected
    The Environmentalist side will refuse any concept which doesn't show that climate change is indisputably real and mankind is to blame
    And
    The Scientist side will refuse any concept which question their science, which is confusing as science has to be questioned for it to be science, else it is merely ideology or at worst, religion.

    As for myself. I'm a geek, and think you can all kiss my ass. I hope you all die from your bickering before the planet cooks you alive.
    Your bs arguing is interfering with my late night gaming sessions, now shut up so I can go play warcraft.

  8. Re:Define people by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    But with the Internet, everyone is an expert~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  9. Re:Religion by l3ert · · Score: 2, Funny

    Agreed but we need a term for when non-scientist and irrational people use scientific lingo to push their ideology, i propose: scientology.

    --
    per dolorem ad astra
  10. Science is Sometimes Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    We have now figured out everything. Unlike 100 years ago, when some things science thought were true but turned out not to be.

    In fact the further you go back, the more wrong scientists have turned out to be. The world's not flat. The universe is expanding.

    Future generations will look back on us as the generation that finally figured everything out so they wouldn't have to.

  11. applied psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't understand that field, and it's all hogwash anyway. Don't RTFA, it's just political propaganda!!